Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
{"title":"Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes.

Methods

This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.

一项随机对照试验的方案,该试验审查了针对阿片类药物使用和精神疾病并发症的社会心理强化治疗和标准药物治疗:半分因子随机对照试验。
背景:阿片类药物的流行对同时患有阿片类药物使用和精神疾病(COD)的患者造成了极大的影响,而这些患者的治疗参与度往往很低。多组分治疗模式是提高 COD 患者获得治疗机会和参与度的流行解决方案。通过系统集成、外联和联网保持独立和清醒(MISSION)是一种混合的多成分联系和治疗方法,它将自信的社区外联与社会心理治疗相结合。本方案文件介绍了一项随机对照试验,该试验比较了 MISSION 和阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗(MOUD)、其多组分部分以及 MOUD 和 MOUD 照常治疗(TAU),以评估健康和社会结果的改善情况:这项研究将采用半分因子设计,将1000名慢性阻塞性肺病患者随机分配到五种治疗条件之一:(1)完整的MISSION干预加MOUD;(2-4)MISSION三部分中的两部分加MOUD;或(5)TAU。次要目标包括研究作用机制,对MISSION和/或其组成部分加MOUD与TAU的实施情况进行经济评估,以及探索性预测建模,使MISSION的最佳部分与患者需求相匹配:这项随机对照试验将有助于确定MISSION(或其组成部分)和MOUD与TAU相比在改善参与治疗、药物使用和精神健康症状方面的有效性。该试验首次在真实世界的治疗场景中将MISSION及其部分与MOUD和TAU进行比较,以确定哪些部分是必要的,哪些部分足以根据患者需求推动治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信