The Care of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cluster-Randomized Trial on Improving the Guideline Conformity of Treatment by the Use of the CEDATA-GPGE Patient Registry.
Luisa Tischler, Aletta Boerkoel, Heiko Krause, Neeltje van den Berg, Jan de Laffolie
{"title":"The Care of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cluster-Randomized Trial on Improving the Guideline Conformity of Treatment by the Use of the CEDATA-GPGE Patient Registry.","authors":"Luisa Tischler, Aletta Boerkoel, Heiko Krause, Neeltje van den Berg, Jan de Laffolie","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment that is not in adequate conformity with the guidelines can adversely affect both the course of disease and the patients' development. The targeted use of digital patient registries may improve real-life adherence to the recommendations of evidence-based guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cluster-randomized, controlled trial (DRKS00015505), treatment providers for the intervention group (IG) documented the treatment of children and adolescents with IBD in the CEDATA-GPGE patient registry; they received automated feedback on the data they entered and on potential deviations of the documented treatment from recommendations contained in the guidelines (care deficits). Treatments providers for the control group (CG) documented treatments as previously, i.e., only in the patients' charts. At the end of a twelve-month observation period, the data from both groups at baseline and on follow-up were analyzed in an intergroup comparison. The primary endpoint was the number of care deficits at twelve months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>319 patients were recruited from 47 pediatric gas troen tero logical centers in Germany (IG: 21 centers and 160 subjects; CG: 26 centers and 159 subjects). Among the 146 subjects in the IG who were followed up at 12 months, there were an average (mean) of 0.17 care deficits per patient (95% confidence interval [0.10; 0.24]). Among the 134 subjects in the CG who were followed up at 12 months, there were an average (mean) of 0.55 [0.43; 0.66] identified care deficits per patient (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Registry-based feedback can help bring treatment and its documentation into better con for - mity with the relevant guidelines and thereby reduce or prevent care deficits in children and adolescents with IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"627-633"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: For children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment that is not in adequate conformity with the guidelines can adversely affect both the course of disease and the patients' development. The targeted use of digital patient registries may improve real-life adherence to the recommendations of evidence-based guidelines.
Methods: In a cluster-randomized, controlled trial (DRKS00015505), treatment providers for the intervention group (IG) documented the treatment of children and adolescents with IBD in the CEDATA-GPGE patient registry; they received automated feedback on the data they entered and on potential deviations of the documented treatment from recommendations contained in the guidelines (care deficits). Treatments providers for the control group (CG) documented treatments as previously, i.e., only in the patients' charts. At the end of a twelve-month observation period, the data from both groups at baseline and on follow-up were analyzed in an intergroup comparison. The primary endpoint was the number of care deficits at twelve months.
Results: 319 patients were recruited from 47 pediatric gas troen tero logical centers in Germany (IG: 21 centers and 160 subjects; CG: 26 centers and 159 subjects). Among the 146 subjects in the IG who were followed up at 12 months, there were an average (mean) of 0.17 care deficits per patient (95% confidence interval [0.10; 0.24]). Among the 134 subjects in the CG who were followed up at 12 months, there were an average (mean) of 0.55 [0.43; 0.66] identified care deficits per patient (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Registry-based feedback can help bring treatment and its documentation into better con for - mity with the relevant guidelines and thereby reduce or prevent care deficits in children and adolescents with IBD.
期刊介绍:
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence.
The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include:
Carelit
CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
Compendex
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database)
EMNursing
GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data)
HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative)
Index Copernicus
Medline (MEDLARS Online)
Medpilot
PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database)
Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus
By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.