Stef van der Meulen, Rory C. Monahan, Kyra A. Gelderman, Cees van Kooten, Y.K. Onno Teng, Tom W.J. Huizinga, Gerda M. Steup-Beekman, Leendert A. Trouw
{"title":"Circulating levels of endogenous complement inhibitors correlate inversely with complement consumption in systemic lupus erythematosus","authors":"Stef van der Meulen, Rory C. Monahan, Kyra A. Gelderman, Cees van Kooten, Y.K. Onno Teng, Tom W.J. Huizinga, Gerda M. Steup-Beekman, Leendert A. Trouw","doi":"10.1002/eji.202450998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by excessive complement activation, contributing to tissue damage. Complement activation can be detected in many organs including the skin, kidney, and brain. The involvement of the central nervous system is particularly relevant to understanding neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), one of the poorest understood manifestations of SLE for which no biomarkers are available. We studied the levels of complement inhibitors in SLE in relation to disease activity and as possible biomarkers to identify NPSLE. Serum levels of complement inhibitors C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), C4b-binding protein (C4BP), Factor I, and Factor H were measured in 345 SLE patients (including 102 with NPSLE) and 108 healthy controls. Compared with controls, SLE patients had higher C1-INH and C4BP but lower Factor I and H levels. All inhibitors positively correlated with total C3 and C4 levels. While correlating with the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), no distinction in inhibitor levels was found between SLE and NPSLE patients. Over time, C1-INH and Factor H levels normalized, but no significant changes were observed for C4BP and Factor I. In SLE the levels of circulating complement inhibitors are inversely correlated to complement consumption but do not serve as biomarkers for NPSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":"54 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eji.202450998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.202450998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by excessive complement activation, contributing to tissue damage. Complement activation can be detected in many organs including the skin, kidney, and brain. The involvement of the central nervous system is particularly relevant to understanding neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), one of the poorest understood manifestations of SLE for which no biomarkers are available. We studied the levels of complement inhibitors in SLE in relation to disease activity and as possible biomarkers to identify NPSLE. Serum levels of complement inhibitors C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), C4b-binding protein (C4BP), Factor I, and Factor H were measured in 345 SLE patients (including 102 with NPSLE) and 108 healthy controls. Compared with controls, SLE patients had higher C1-INH and C4BP but lower Factor I and H levels. All inhibitors positively correlated with total C3 and C4 levels. While correlating with the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), no distinction in inhibitor levels was found between SLE and NPSLE patients. Over time, C1-INH and Factor H levels normalized, but no significant changes were observed for C4BP and Factor I. In SLE the levels of circulating complement inhibitors are inversely correlated to complement consumption but do not serve as biomarkers for NPSLE.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Immunology (EJI) is an official journal of EFIS. Established in 1971, EJI continues to serve the needs of the global immunology community covering basic, translational and clinical research, ranging from adaptive and innate immunity through to vaccines and immunotherapy, cancer, autoimmunity, allergy and more. Mechanistic insights and thought-provoking immunological findings are of interest, as are studies using the latest omics technologies. We offer fast track review for competitive situations, including recently scooped papers, format free submission, transparent and fair peer review and more as detailed in our policies.