A new decision-support tool in a multi-center randomized trial for personalized, optimized, and simplified fertility treatment in non-PCOS patients.

IF 2.8 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Reproduction & fertility Pub Date : 2024-09-16 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1530/RAF-24-0013
Urmila Diwekar, Shyam Gupta, Anjali Gahlan, Sumitra Hota, Kshitiz Murdia, Nitiz Murdia, Vipin Chandra, Nihar Bhoi, Sanjay Joag
{"title":"A new decision-support tool in a multi-center randomized trial for personalized, optimized, and simplified fertility treatment in non-PCOS patients.","authors":"Urmila Diwekar, Shyam Gupta, Anjali Gahlan, Sumitra Hota, Kshitiz Murdia, Nitiz Murdia, Vipin Chandra, Nihar Bhoi, Sanjay Joag","doi":"10.1530/RAF-24-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, in achieving the following outcomes: reducing the total cumulative dosage of Gonadotropins (Gns) used during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles and reducing the repeated ultrasonograms (USG) for monitoring follicular growth without compromising the number of good quality blastocysts obtained. The study design employed a multi-center randomized trial. The study enrolled 115 women aged 25-45 years undergoing IVF. Among the participants, 55 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (Opt-IVF), and 60 were randomly assigned to the control group. The intervention involved using a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, to guide Gn dosing and trigger dates. The participants in the intervention group required significantly lower cumulative Gn dosage. The intervention group had higher numbers of oocytes retrieved and M2 retrieved than the control group. The number of good-quality blastocysts, the good-quality blastocyst rate, the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and the pregnancy rate in the intervention group were significantly higher than in the control group. The utilization of the clinical decision support tool led to several positive outcomes, including eliminating the need for ultrasound exams after day 5, reducing the dosage of Gn required, and yielding significantly higher numbers of high-quality blastocysts and higher pregnancy rates. Thus, Opt-IVF can successfully provide a personalized, optimized, and simplified approach to superovulation. Opt-IVF consistently outperformed the clinical teams in most of the outcomes. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID - NCT05811065). Date of Registration: 15 March 2023. Date of enrollment of the first subject: 20 March 2023.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>The high cost of IVF is a result of costly drugs, fixed prices for infrastructure, extensive testing required, and labor costs for physicians and other healthcare personnel. Superovulation, which involves the drug-induced release of multiple eggs needed for IVF, accounts for a significant share of these costs. Current approaches to superovulation involve almost daily monitoring of follicle development using ultrasound and/or blood tests. The daily dosage of stimulatory hormones is then prescribed by physicians based on empirical data and clinical experience. However, the dose is not optimized for each patient, and overstimulation complications can occur. The cost of testing and drugs makes this stage very expensive. To overcome the shortcomings of this system, we have developed a decision support tool (Opt-IVF) that can provide a personalized model-optimized dosage profile for each patient. The clinical results show that Opt-IVF optimizes and personalizes dosage, reduces testing, and provides better outcomes for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-24-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graphical abstract:

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, in achieving the following outcomes: reducing the total cumulative dosage of Gonadotropins (Gns) used during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles and reducing the repeated ultrasonograms (USG) for monitoring follicular growth without compromising the number of good quality blastocysts obtained. The study design employed a multi-center randomized trial. The study enrolled 115 women aged 25-45 years undergoing IVF. Among the participants, 55 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (Opt-IVF), and 60 were randomly assigned to the control group. The intervention involved using a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, to guide Gn dosing and trigger dates. The participants in the intervention group required significantly lower cumulative Gn dosage. The intervention group had higher numbers of oocytes retrieved and M2 retrieved than the control group. The number of good-quality blastocysts, the good-quality blastocyst rate, the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and the pregnancy rate in the intervention group were significantly higher than in the control group. The utilization of the clinical decision support tool led to several positive outcomes, including eliminating the need for ultrasound exams after day 5, reducing the dosage of Gn required, and yielding significantly higher numbers of high-quality blastocysts and higher pregnancy rates. Thus, Opt-IVF can successfully provide a personalized, optimized, and simplified approach to superovulation. Opt-IVF consistently outperformed the clinical teams in most of the outcomes. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID - NCT05811065). Date of Registration: 15 March 2023. Date of enrollment of the first subject: 20 March 2023.

Lay summary: The high cost of IVF is a result of costly drugs, fixed prices for infrastructure, extensive testing required, and labor costs for physicians and other healthcare personnel. Superovulation, which involves the drug-induced release of multiple eggs needed for IVF, accounts for a significant share of these costs. Current approaches to superovulation involve almost daily monitoring of follicle development using ultrasound and/or blood tests. The daily dosage of stimulatory hormones is then prescribed by physicians based on empirical data and clinical experience. However, the dose is not optimized for each patient, and overstimulation complications can occur. The cost of testing and drugs makes this stage very expensive. To overcome the shortcomings of this system, we have developed a decision support tool (Opt-IVF) that can provide a personalized model-optimized dosage profile for each patient. The clinical results show that Opt-IVF optimizes and personalizes dosage, reduces testing, and provides better outcomes for patients.

多中心随机试验中的新型决策支持工具,为非多囊卵巢综合症患者提供个性化、优化和简化的生育治疗。
研究问题本研究旨在评估临床决策支持工具 Opt-IVF 在实现以下结果方面的有效性:在不影响获得优质囊胚数量的情况下,减少控制性卵巢刺激周期中促性腺激素(Gn)的总累积用量,并减少用于卵泡生长监测的重复超声波检查(USG):研究设计采用了多中心随机试验。该研究共招募了 115 名年龄在 25-45 岁之间、接受体外受精的女性。其中 55 人被随机分配到干预组(Opt-IVF),60 人被随机分配到对照组。干预措施包括使用临床决策支持工具 Opt-IVF 来指导促性腺激素剂量和触发日期,以实现个性化控制的卵巢刺激周期:结果:干预组参与者在控制性卵巢刺激周期中所需的促性腺激素累积剂量明显降低。干预组获得的卵母细胞数量和获得的 M2 卵母细胞数量均高于对照组。干预组的优质囊胚数、优质囊胚率、卵巢敏感指数(OSI)和妊娠率均显著高于对照组:结论:临床决策支持工具的使用带来了一些积极的结果,包括无需在第 5 天后进行超声波检查、减少了促性腺激素的用量、获得的优质囊胚数量和妊娠率明显提高。因此,Opt-IVF 可成功提供个性化、优化和简化的超排卵方法。在所有结果方面,Opt-IVF 始终优于临床团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信