Prediction of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and colonisation: A systematic review.

Leila Figueiredo Dantas, Igor Tona Peres, Bianca Brandão de Paula Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Silvio Hamacher, Pedro Kurtz, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Fernando Augusto Bozza
{"title":"Prediction of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and colonisation: A systematic review.","authors":"Leila Figueiredo Dantas, Igor Tona Peres, Bianca Brandão de Paula Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Silvio Hamacher, Pedro Kurtz, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Fernando Augusto Bozza","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI) represent a public health priority in most countries worldwide. Our main objective was to systematically review the quality of the predictive modeling literature regarding multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted and reported a Systematic Literature Review according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We analysed the quality of the articles in terms of adherence to the TRIPOD checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 1935 papers and 15 final articles were included in the review. Most studies analysed used traditional prediction models (logistic regression), and only three developed machine-learning techniques. We noted poor adherence to the main methodological issues recommended in the TRIPOD checklist to develop prediction models, such as handling missing data (20% adherence), model-building procedures (20% adherence), assessing model performance (47% adherence), and reporting performance measures (33% adherence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review found few studies that use efficient alternatives to predict the acquisition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in ICUs. Furthermore, we noted a lack of strategies for dealing with missing data, feature selection, and imbalanced datasets, a common problem in HAI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI) represent a public health priority in most countries worldwide. Our main objective was to systematically review the quality of the predictive modeling literature regarding multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

Methods: We conducted and reported a Systematic Literature Review according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We analysed the quality of the articles in terms of adherence to the TRIPOD checklist.

Results: The initial search identified 1935 papers and 15 final articles were included in the review. Most studies analysed used traditional prediction models (logistic regression), and only three developed machine-learning techniques. We noted poor adherence to the main methodological issues recommended in the TRIPOD checklist to develop prediction models, such as handling missing data (20% adherence), model-building procedures (20% adherence), assessing model performance (47% adherence), and reporting performance measures (33% adherence).

Conclusions: Our review found few studies that use efficient alternatives to predict the acquisition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in ICUs. Furthermore, we noted a lack of strategies for dealing with missing data, feature selection, and imbalanced datasets, a common problem in HAI studies.

耐多药细菌(MDR)医院获得性感染(HAI)和定植的预测:系统综述。
背景:医院获得性感染(HAI)是全球大多数国家的公共卫生重点。我们的主要目的是系统回顾有关重症监护病房(ICU)中耐多药革兰氏阴性菌的预测模型文献的质量:我们按照 PRISMA 声明的建议进行了系统性文献综述并进行了报告。我们根据 TRIPOD 核对表分析了文章的质量:初步检索发现了 1935 篇论文,最终有 15 篇文章被纳入综述。大多数分析研究使用了传统的预测模型(逻辑回归),只有三项研究开发了机器学习技术。我们注意到,在开发预测模型时,对TRIPOD核对表中建议的主要方法问题的遵守情况较差,如处理缺失数据(遵守率为20%)、模型建立程序(遵守率为20%)、评估模型性能(遵守率为47%)和报告性能指标(遵守率为33%):我们的综述发现,很少有研究使用有效的替代方法来预测重症监护病房中耐多药革兰氏阴性菌的感染情况。此外,我们还注意到缺乏处理缺失数据、特征选择和不平衡数据集的策略,而这是HAI研究中的一个常见问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信