Evaluating the role and diagnostic performance of ultrasound in diagnosing soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2024.2393349
Yufei Zhang, Shijie Mao, Fangfang Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating the role and diagnostic performance of ultrasound in diagnosing soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yufei Zhang, Shijie Mao, Fangfang Zhang","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2393349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the combined accuracy of ultrasonic imaging in diagnosing soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors and identifies factors contributing to variability in its diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search in significant databases used specific keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two authors independently performed cohort characterization and data analysis, with a third author resolving disagreements. A multivariate random effects model estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and overall accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultrasound imaging demonstrated high pooled sensitivity and specificity, indicating effectiveness in identifying lesions. Variability in accuracy was attributed to factors such as tumor type and location, operator experience, and clinic location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasonic imaging is a reliable diagnostic tool for soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors, providing high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in accuracy underscores the need to consider operator experience and tumor characteristics. Further research should explore the impact of technological advancements and include non-English studies to enhance understanding of ultrasound imaging's diagnostic validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2393349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the combined accuracy of ultrasonic imaging in diagnosing soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors and identifies factors contributing to variability in its diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: A literature search in significant databases used specific keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two authors independently performed cohort characterization and data analysis, with a third author resolving disagreements. A multivariate random effects model estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and overall accuracy.

Results: Ultrasound imaging demonstrated high pooled sensitivity and specificity, indicating effectiveness in identifying lesions. Variability in accuracy was attributed to factors such as tumor type and location, operator experience, and clinic location.

Conclusions: Ultrasonic imaging is a reliable diagnostic tool for soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors, providing high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in accuracy underscores the need to consider operator experience and tumor characteristics. Further research should explore the impact of technological advancements and include non-English studies to enhance understanding of ultrasound imaging's diagnostic validity.

评估超声波在诊断成人软组织肿瘤和假瘤中的作用和诊断性能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了超声波成像诊断软组织肿瘤和假瘤的综合准确性,并确定了导致其诊断准确性差异的因素:在重要数据库中进行文献检索时使用了特定的关键词和纳入/排除标准。两位作者独立完成了队列特征描述和数据分析,第三位作者负责解决分歧。一个多变量随机效应模型估算了集合灵敏度、特异性、预测值和总体准确性:结果:超声成像显示出较高的集合灵敏度和特异性,表明其能有效识别病变。准确性的差异可归因于肿瘤类型和位置、操作者经验和诊所位置等因素:结论:超声波成像是诊断软组织肿瘤和假瘤的可靠工具,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。结论:超声波成像是诊断软组织肿瘤和假性肿瘤的可靠工具,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。然而,准确性的差异突出表明需要考虑操作者的经验和肿瘤的特征。进一步的研究应探讨技术进步的影响,并纳入非英语研究,以加深对超声成像诊断有效性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信