Updating a conceptual model of effective symptom management in palliative care to include patient and carer perspective: a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emma J Chapman, Carole A Paley, Simon Pini, Lucy E Ziegler
{"title":"Updating a conceptual model of effective symptom management in palliative care to include patient and carer perspective: a qualitative study.","authors":"Emma J Chapman, Carole A Paley, Simon Pini, Lucy E Ziegler","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01544-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A conceptual model of effective symptom management was previously developed from interviews with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCP) working in English hospices. Here we aimed to answer the question; does a HCP data-derived model represent the experience of patients and carers of people with advanced cancer?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six patients with advanced cancer and six carers to gain an in-depth understanding of their experience of symptom management. Analysis was based on the framework method; transcription, familiarisation, coding, applying analytical framework (conceptual model), charting, interpretation. Inductive framework analysis was used to align data with themes in the existing model. A deductive approach was also used to identify new themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experience of patients and carers aligned with key steps of engagement, decision making, partnership and delivery in the HCP-based model. The data aligned with 18 of 23 themes. These were; Role definition and boundaries, Multidisciplinary team decision making, Availability of services/staff, Clinician-Patient relationship/rapport, Patient preferences, Patient characteristics, Quality of life versus treatment need, Staff time/burden, Psychological support -informal, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals- patients, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals-HCPs, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals- family friends, carers, Professional, service and referral factors, Continuity of care, Multidisciplinary team working, Palliative care philosophy and culture, Physical environment and facilities, Referral process and delays. Four additional patient and carer-derived themes were identified: Carer Burden, Communication, Medicines management and COVID-19. Constructs that did not align were Experience (of staff), Training (of staff), Guidelines and evidence, Psychological support (for staff) and Formal psychological support (for patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A healthcare professional-based conceptual model of effective symptom management aligned well with the experience of patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Additional domains were identified. We make four recommendations for change arising from this research. Routine appraisal and acknowledgement of carer burden, medicine management tasks and previous experience in healthcare roles; improved access to communication skills training for staff and review of patient communication needs. Further research should explore the symptom management experience of those living alone and how these people can be better supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01544-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A conceptual model of effective symptom management was previously developed from interviews with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCP) working in English hospices. Here we aimed to answer the question; does a HCP data-derived model represent the experience of patients and carers of people with advanced cancer?

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six patients with advanced cancer and six carers to gain an in-depth understanding of their experience of symptom management. Analysis was based on the framework method; transcription, familiarisation, coding, applying analytical framework (conceptual model), charting, interpretation. Inductive framework analysis was used to align data with themes in the existing model. A deductive approach was also used to identify new themes.

Results: The experience of patients and carers aligned with key steps of engagement, decision making, partnership and delivery in the HCP-based model. The data aligned with 18 of 23 themes. These were; Role definition and boundaries, Multidisciplinary team decision making, Availability of services/staff, Clinician-Patient relationship/rapport, Patient preferences, Patient characteristics, Quality of life versus treatment need, Staff time/burden, Psychological support -informal, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals- patients, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals-HCPs, Appropriate understanding, expectations, acceptance and goals- family friends, carers, Professional, service and referral factors, Continuity of care, Multidisciplinary team working, Palliative care philosophy and culture, Physical environment and facilities, Referral process and delays. Four additional patient and carer-derived themes were identified: Carer Burden, Communication, Medicines management and COVID-19. Constructs that did not align were Experience (of staff), Training (of staff), Guidelines and evidence, Psychological support (for staff) and Formal psychological support (for patients).

Conclusions: A healthcare professional-based conceptual model of effective symptom management aligned well with the experience of patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Additional domains were identified. We make four recommendations for change arising from this research. Routine appraisal and acknowledgement of carer burden, medicine management tasks and previous experience in healthcare roles; improved access to communication skills training for staff and review of patient communication needs. Further research should explore the symptom management experience of those living alone and how these people can be better supported.

更新姑息关怀中有效症状管理的概念模型,纳入患者和照护者的视角:一项定性研究。
背景:此前,通过对在英国临终关怀机构工作的多学科医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行访谈,我们建立了一个有效症状管理的概念模型。在此,我们旨在回答这样一个问题:从医护人员数据中得出的模型是否代表了晚期癌症患者和照护者的经验?我们对六名晚期癌症患者和六名照护者进行了半结构式访谈,以深入了解他们在症状管理方面的经验。分析以框架法为基础:记录、熟悉、编码、应用分析框架(概念模型)、制图、解释。归纳式框架分析用于将数据与现有模型中的主题相一致。此外,还采用了演绎法来确定新的主题:结果:患者和护理者的经历与基于 HCP 模型的参与、决策、合作和交付等关键步骤相吻合。数据符合 23 个主题中的 18 个。这些主题是角色定义和界限、多学科团队决策、服务/工作人员的可用性、临床医生与患者的关系/融洽度、患者偏好、患者特征、生活质量与治疗需求、工作人员的时间/负担、心理支持--非正式、适当的理解、期望、接受和目标--患者、适当的理解、期望、接受和目标--医护人员;适当的理解、期望、接受和目标--家属朋友、照护者;专业、服务和转介因素;持续性关怀;多学科团队合作;姑息关怀理念和文化;物理环境和设施;转介过程和延误。另外还确定了四个由患者和照护者衍生的主题:照护者负担、沟通、药物管理和 COVID-19。不一致的结构有:经验(员工)、培训(员工)、指南和证据、心理支持(员工)和正式心理支持(患者):基于医护人员的有效症状管理概念模型与晚期癌症患者及其照护者的经验非常吻合。我们还发现了其他领域。我们根据这项研究提出了四项改革建议。对照护者的负担、药物管理任务和以往在医疗保健岗位上的经验进行常规评估和确认;改善员工接受沟通技巧培训的机会,并对患者的沟通需求进行审查。进一步的研究应探讨独居者的症状管理经验,以及如何为这些人提供更好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信