Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against Aspergillus isolates.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Assaf Potruch, Hila Elinav, Matan J Cohen, Alexander Rouvinski, Itzhack Polacheck, Maya Korem
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates.","authors":"Assaf Potruch, Hila Elinav, Matan J Cohen, Alexander Rouvinski, Itzhack Polacheck, Maya Korem","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.00280-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with <i>Aspergillus</i> infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00280-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against Aspergillus spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of Aspergillus spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against Aspergillus isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against Aspergillus isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with Aspergillus infections.

比较评估 Sensititre YeastOne 和 CLSI M38-Ed3 参考方法,以确定棘白菌素对曲霉菌分离物的最低有效浓度。
棘白菌素类药物对曲霉菌属的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)并不代表棘白菌素类药物的实际抑菌阈值。因此,评估其活性的推荐方法是在肉汤微稀释法中测定最低有效浓度(MEC),而这种方法在临床环境中并不常见。本研究旨在评估一种用户友好型商业方法 Sensititre YeastOne (SYO),以确定棘白菌素(卡泊芬净、阿尼妥芬净和米卡芬净)对曲霉菌属的有效性。 使用 SYO 和临床与实验室标准协会 (CLSI) 的参考方法测定了棘白菌素对 23 株曲霉菌属分离物的最小有效浓度。使用倒置显微镜和读数镜读取 MEC。测试方法之间的基本一致(EA)定义为±两倍稀释差。在使用倒置显微镜测定棘白菌素对曲霉菌分离物的 MEC 时,参考方法和 SYO 之间的 EA 很高(91%-100%)。用倒置显微镜和读数镜测定的 SYO MEC 之间的 EA 也很高,但所需的培养时间不同。SYO 是确定棘白菌素对曲霉菌分离物的 MEC 的一种可靠、简单的方法,最好使用倒置显微镜,在临床实验室需要进行棘白菌素药敏试验时可方便使用。重要意义 使用 Sensititre YeastOne(SYO)等商业方法测定棘白菌素对曲霉菌属的最低有效浓度(MEC)已被证明是临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)参考方法的可靠替代方法。因此,它更适用于工作量大的临床实验室。SYO 可提供与标准方法相当的准确结果,并能为曲霉菌感染患者选择更理想的抗真菌治疗方法提供指导,从而改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信