Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated (CLARO PARTE) for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ivy Riano, César Alas-Pineda, Sarahi Reyes Garcia, Raúl Murillo, Francisco Gutiérrez-Delgado, Eduardo Cazap, Celia Maria Pais Viegas, Marcela de la Torre, Kaory C Barahona, Gustavo J Sarria, Ramón Del Castillo Bahi, Álvaro Luongo-Céspedes, Beatriz Ovalles, Flory Vanessa Umaña Herrera, Ricardo Sánchez, Shauna McVorran, Benjamin Williams, Joseph Kascmar, Linda S Kennedy, Kathleen D Lyons, Suyapa Bejarano, Sandra L Wong
{"title":"Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated (CLARO PARTE) for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries.","authors":"Ivy Riano, César Alas-Pineda, Sarahi Reyes Garcia, Raúl Murillo, Francisco Gutiérrez-Delgado, Eduardo Cazap, Celia Maria Pais Viegas, Marcela de la Torre, Kaory C Barahona, Gustavo J Sarria, Ramón Del Castillo Bahi, Álvaro Luongo-Céspedes, Beatriz Ovalles, Flory Vanessa Umaña Herrera, Ricardo Sánchez, Shauna McVorran, Benjamin Williams, Joseph Kascmar, Linda S Kennedy, Kathleen D Lyons, Suyapa Bejarano, Sandra L Wong","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and rank suitable safety innovations developed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) radiation oncology centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multimodal participatory engagement collaboration with the Latin-American and Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology. The study consisted of four phases. Innovations were collected from a panel of radiotherapy experts representing a diverse group of 11 countries from LAC (Phase I). Next, a medical scientific team compared the innovations against international standards regarding their potential impact on risk of infection, clinical operation, and continuity of quality cancer care (Phase II). Their findings were supplied to the country representatives who rated the innovations for acceptability in their cancer centers (Phase III), resulting in a final report of the panel's recommendations (Phase IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 innovations were reported by the country representatives and merged by the medical scientific team into 24 innovations that combined similar innovations. The 24 innovations were grouped into six categories including practices aimed at (1) reducing clinic crowding (n = 3), (2) increasing screening and vaccinations for COVID-19 disease (n = 5), (3) implementing social distancing (n = 6), (4) strengthening personal infection equipment and disinfection (n = 6), (5) avoiding delaying or shortening treatment protocols (n = 2), and (6) mixed procedures (n = 2). The medical scientific team found nearly all innovations were supported by international recommendations and rated as safe, efficient, and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By using the lessons learned from the Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated study, a manual of scalable practices in radiation oncology clinics may be developed to guide actions during future large-scale public health crises in low- and middle-income countries of LAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2400051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and rank suitable safety innovations developed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) radiation oncology centers.

Methods: We conducted a multimodal participatory engagement collaboration with the Latin-American and Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology. The study consisted of four phases. Innovations were collected from a panel of radiotherapy experts representing a diverse group of 11 countries from LAC (Phase I). Next, a medical scientific team compared the innovations against international standards regarding their potential impact on risk of infection, clinical operation, and continuity of quality cancer care (Phase II). Their findings were supplied to the country representatives who rated the innovations for acceptability in their cancer centers (Phase III), resulting in a final report of the panel's recommendations (Phase IV).

Results: A total of 81 innovations were reported by the country representatives and merged by the medical scientific team into 24 innovations that combined similar innovations. The 24 innovations were grouped into six categories including practices aimed at (1) reducing clinic crowding (n = 3), (2) increasing screening and vaccinations for COVID-19 disease (n = 5), (3) implementing social distancing (n = 6), (4) strengthening personal infection equipment and disinfection (n = 6), (5) avoiding delaying or shortening treatment protocols (n = 2), and (6) mixed procedures (n = 2). The medical scientific team found nearly all innovations were supported by international recommendations and rated as safe, efficient, and acceptable.

Conclusion: By using the lessons learned from the Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated study, a manual of scalable practices in radiation oncology clinics may be developed to guide actions during future large-scale public health crises in low- and middle-income countries of LAC.

社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究:针对拉丁美洲和加勒比国家的大流行病适当放射治疗创新评估(CLARO PARTE)。
目的:本研究旨在确定、评估拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)放射肿瘤中心在 COVID-19 大流行期间开发的适当安全创新方法,并对其进行排序:我们与拉丁美洲和加勒比地区肿瘤内科学会合作开展了一项多模式参与式合作。研究分为四个阶段。首先,从代表拉丁美洲和加勒比地区 11 个国家的放疗专家小组收集创新成果(第一阶段)。接下来,医疗科学小组将这些创新与国际标准进行比较,以了解其对感染风险、临床操作和优质癌症治疗连续性的潜在影响(第二阶段)。他们的研究结果将提供给国家代表,由国家代表对这些创新在其癌症中心的可接受性进行评分(第三阶段),最终形成小组建议报告(第四阶段):结果:国家代表共报告了 81 项创新,医疗科学小组将其合并为 24 项创新,将类似的创新合并在一起。这 24 项创新分为六类,其中包括:(1) 减少诊所拥挤(3 项),(2) 增加 COVID-19 疾病的筛查和疫苗接种(5 项),(3) 实施社会疏远(6 项),(4) 加强个人感染设备和消毒(6 项),(5) 避免延迟或缩短治疗方案(2 项),以及 (6) 混合程序(2 项)。医疗科学小组发现,几乎所有创新都得到了国际建议的支持,并被评为安全、高效和可接受:结论:利用从社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究中汲取的经验,我们可以在大流行病适当的放射治疗创新中取得成功:结论:通过利用 "社区主导的肿瘤学行动研究:评估适合大流行病的放射治疗创新 "研究中获得的经验,可以编写一本肿瘤放射治疗诊所可推广实践手册,为拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区中低收入国家在未来大规模公共卫生危机中的行动提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信