Outgoing initial healthcare facility follow-up call metrics and barriers within a single United States poison center.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Justin Arnold, William Doyle, Theo Sher, Diep Nguyen, Diana Dean, Rahul Mhaskar
{"title":"Outgoing initial healthcare facility follow-up call metrics and barriers within a single United States poison center.","authors":"Justin Arnold, William Doyle, Theo Sher, Diep Nguyen, Diana Dean, Rahul Mhaskar","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2390132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Specialists in poison information are responsible for following-up with exposure cases managed at healthcare facilities. However, the amount of time, call components, and barriers met when completing an initial healthcare facility follow-up call in which a large amount of data and clinical recommendations are shared is not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted by randomizing healthcare facility initial follow-up calls from January to April 2022. One hundred and thirty calls that met the inclusion criteria were randomly selected. We recorded seven unique time intervals within each call. Day of the week, time of day, and variability amongst specialists in poison information were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial follow-up calls took a median of 7.2 min. Most (67%) follow-up calls were directed to emergency departments. Barriers to completion of calls were most commonly due to the healthcare reporter being busy (37%) and specialists in poison information being placed on terminal hold (30%). There was variability between specialists in poison information in the time for healthcare reporter to share data (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), time for specialists in poison information recommendations (<i>P</i> = 0.0076), and total time (<i>P</i> = 0.0003).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Variability exists amongst specialists in poison information during periods of information exchange, particularly when the healthcare reporter is providing information and subsequently when the specialist in poison information is providing recommendations. Barriers to completing calls centered around healthcare reporter being busy or the specialist in poison information being placed on a terminal hold. There was no correlation with the time or day of the week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With notable variability in these calls during periods of intense communication of data and treatment recommendations, there are likely opportunities for specialists in poison information and poison center directors to work together to address variability and overcome barriers to completing initial hospital follow-up calls. Further studies to evaluate variability amongst specialists in poison information are the next steps in understanding this complex topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2390132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Specialists in poison information are responsible for following-up with exposure cases managed at healthcare facilities. However, the amount of time, call components, and barriers met when completing an initial healthcare facility follow-up call in which a large amount of data and clinical recommendations are shared is not well described.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted by randomizing healthcare facility initial follow-up calls from January to April 2022. One hundred and thirty calls that met the inclusion criteria were randomly selected. We recorded seven unique time intervals within each call. Day of the week, time of day, and variability amongst specialists in poison information were also assessed.

Results: Initial follow-up calls took a median of 7.2 min. Most (67%) follow-up calls were directed to emergency departments. Barriers to completion of calls were most commonly due to the healthcare reporter being busy (37%) and specialists in poison information being placed on terminal hold (30%). There was variability between specialists in poison information in the time for healthcare reporter to share data (P < 0.0001), time for specialists in poison information recommendations (P = 0.0076), and total time (P = 0.0003).

Discussion: Variability exists amongst specialists in poison information during periods of information exchange, particularly when the healthcare reporter is providing information and subsequently when the specialist in poison information is providing recommendations. Barriers to completing calls centered around healthcare reporter being busy or the specialist in poison information being placed on a terminal hold. There was no correlation with the time or day of the week.

Conclusions: With notable variability in these calls during periods of intense communication of data and treatment recommendations, there are likely opportunities for specialists in poison information and poison center directors to work together to address variability and overcome barriers to completing initial hospital follow-up calls. Further studies to evaluate variability amongst specialists in poison information are the next steps in understanding this complex topic.

美国一家毒物中心的首次医疗保健机构随访呼叫指标和障碍。
导言:毒物信息专家负责跟进医疗机构管理的暴露病例。然而,在完成首次医疗机构随访电话(其中共享了大量数据和临床建议)时所需的时间、电话内容和遇到的障碍却没有得到很好的描述:方法: 我们在 2022 年 1 月至 4 月期间对医疗机构的首次随访电话进行了随机分配,从而开展了一项回顾性观察研究。我们随机抽取了符合纳入标准的 130 个电话。我们在每通电话中记录了七个独特的时间间隔。我们还评估了一周中的哪一天、一天中的什么时间以及毒物信息专家之间的差异:结果:最初的后续电话耗时中位数为 7.2 分钟。大多数(67%)后续电话都是打给急诊科的。完成电话的障碍最常见的原因是医疗保健报告人忙碌(37%)和毒物信息专家被终端搁置(30%)。毒物信息专家之间在医疗报告人共享数据的时间(P = 0.0076)和总时间(P = 0.0003)上存在差异:讨论:毒物信息专家在信息交流期间存在差异,尤其是在医疗报告人提供信息以及随后毒物信息专家提供建议时。完成通话的障碍主要集中在医疗报告人忙碌或毒物信息专家被终端搁置。这些障碍与时间或星期没有关联:结论:在数据和治疗建议的密集交流期间,这些电话存在明显的差异性,毒物信息专家和毒物中心主任可能有机会合作解决差异性问题,并克服完成首次医院随访电话的障碍。为了解这一复杂的课题,下一步将开展进一步研究,评估毒物信息专家之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信