Examining the impact of spirituality religious strength on behavioral and emotional health among youth with multiple adverse childhood experiences

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
{"title":"Examining the impact of spirituality religious strength on behavioral and emotional health among youth with multiple adverse childhood experiences","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Although spiritual/religious strengths (SRS) are widely believed to be a protective factor for youth physical and mental wellness, scant evidence is available regarding how much and in what direction a person’s past adverse experiences can affect the said protection. The study aims to validate the overall protective effect of SRS on health and investigate the mutual effect modification of SRS and accumulated adverse experiences exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study is a cross-sectional design utilizing the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) administered to foster care youth aged between 5 and 17 in a large, mid-western state from July to December 2020. Logistic regressions were used on a gender-balanced working sample of 4,802 youths to model the odds of physical and mental unwellness measured by 12 behavioral and emotional needs (BEN) items in CANS and the combined multi-BENs (MBE) as 4 or more BEN items, given the presence of (a) SRS identified by CANS, (b) past trauma as having 4 or more out of 10 adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) items on the CANS, denoted as multi-ACEs (MAC), and (c) co-occurring SRS and MAC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Primarily, the study found supported the protective benefits of SRS as the presence was associated with lower levels of BEN. However, the higher levels of adverse experiences exposure were associated with an attenuation of the relationship between SRS and BEN. Secondarily, females were found to have higher SRS and lower BEN than males; adolescents between 13 and 17 had disproportionally more ACES, greater BEN and lower SRS; Black youth had disproportionally more trauma exposure and higher BEN, but had higher SRS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings imply that having spiritual/religious strength helps promote wellbeing among foster care youth. However, it appears the greater levels of traumatic experiences exposure can overwhelm this positive impact. These findings are consistent with the complex literature on the role of spiritual/religious strength in mental health and may help clarify this complex relationship. Trauma-informed intervention should be considered nuanced approaches to address SRS among children and youth who present with these strengths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924004195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Although spiritual/religious strengths (SRS) are widely believed to be a protective factor for youth physical and mental wellness, scant evidence is available regarding how much and in what direction a person’s past adverse experiences can affect the said protection. The study aims to validate the overall protective effect of SRS on health and investigate the mutual effect modification of SRS and accumulated adverse experiences exposure.

Methods

The study is a cross-sectional design utilizing the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) administered to foster care youth aged between 5 and 17 in a large, mid-western state from July to December 2020. Logistic regressions were used on a gender-balanced working sample of 4,802 youths to model the odds of physical and mental unwellness measured by 12 behavioral and emotional needs (BEN) items in CANS and the combined multi-BENs (MBE) as 4 or more BEN items, given the presence of (a) SRS identified by CANS, (b) past trauma as having 4 or more out of 10 adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) items on the CANS, denoted as multi-ACEs (MAC), and (c) co-occurring SRS and MAC.

Results

Primarily, the study found supported the protective benefits of SRS as the presence was associated with lower levels of BEN. However, the higher levels of adverse experiences exposure were associated with an attenuation of the relationship between SRS and BEN. Secondarily, females were found to have higher SRS and lower BEN than males; adolescents between 13 and 17 had disproportionally more ACES, greater BEN and lower SRS; Black youth had disproportionally more trauma exposure and higher BEN, but had higher SRS.

Conclusion

The findings imply that having spiritual/religious strength helps promote wellbeing among foster care youth. However, it appears the greater levels of traumatic experiences exposure can overwhelm this positive impact. These findings are consistent with the complex literature on the role of spiritual/religious strength in mental health and may help clarify this complex relationship. Trauma-informed intervention should be considered nuanced approaches to address SRS among children and youth who present with these strengths.

研究精神宗教力量对有多种不良童年经历的青少年的行为和情绪健康的影响
目的 虽然人们普遍认为精神/宗教力量(SRS)是青少年身心健康的保护因素,但关于一个人过去的不良经历会在多大程度上和以何种方式对上述保护作用产生影响,目前还缺乏相关证据。本研究旨在验证 SRS 对健康的整体保护作用,并调查 SRS 和累积的不良经历暴露的相互影响。研究采用横断面设计,利用儿童和青少年需求与优势(CANS),于 2020 年 7 月至 12 月在一个中西部大州对 5 至 17 岁的寄养青少年进行调查。我们对 4802 名青少年的性别平衡工作样本进行了逻辑回归,以根据 CANS 中的 12 个行为和情感需求(BEN)项目以及 4 个或更多 BEN 项目的组合多重 BENs(MBE)来建立身心不健康几率模型、(b) 过去的创伤,即在 CANS 的 10 个不良童年经历 (ACE) 项目中,有 4 个或更多项目,称为多重不良童年经历 (MAC),以及 (c) 同时存在 SRS 和 MAC。结果研究发现,SRS 的存在与较低的 BEN 水平相关,因此支持 SRS 的保护性益处。然而,较高水平的不良经历与 SRS 和 BEN 之间的关系减弱有关。其次,与男性相比,女性的 SRS 水平较高,而 BEN 水平较低;13 至 17 岁青少年的 ACES 水平过高,BEN 水平较高,而 SRS 水平较低;黑人青少年的创伤暴露水平过高,BEN 水平较高,但 SRS 水平较高。然而,更多的创伤经历似乎会压倒这种积极影响。这些发现与有关精神/宗教力量在心理健康中的作用的复杂文献相一致,并可能有助于澄清这种复杂的关系。应考虑采取创伤知情干预的细微方法,以解决具有这些优势的儿童和青少年的 SRS 问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信