Construct validity of PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, and physical function as patient-reported outcomes in adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An international study from the OMERACT myositis working group

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ellen Romich , Didem Saygin , Dana DiRenzo , Christopher A. Mecoli , Ingrid de Groot , Karin Lodin , Malin Regardt , Catherine Sarver , Ju Yeon Kim , Jin Kyun Park , Kelly Beer , Merrilee Needham , Helene Alexanderson , Lisa Christopher-Stine , Marianne de Visser , Joost Raaphorst , OMERACT Myositis Working Group
{"title":"Construct validity of PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, and physical function as patient-reported outcomes in adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An international study from the OMERACT myositis working group","authors":"Ellen Romich ,&nbsp;Didem Saygin ,&nbsp;Dana DiRenzo ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Mecoli ,&nbsp;Ingrid de Groot ,&nbsp;Karin Lodin ,&nbsp;Malin Regardt ,&nbsp;Catherine Sarver ,&nbsp;Ju Yeon Kim ,&nbsp;Jin Kyun Park ,&nbsp;Kelly Beer ,&nbsp;Merrilee Needham ,&nbsp;Helene Alexanderson ,&nbsp;Lisa Christopher-Stine ,&nbsp;Marianne de Visser ,&nbsp;Joost Raaphorst ,&nbsp;OMERACT Myositis Working Group","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Validated patient-reported outcome measures to assess disease impact in patients with adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are needed. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, and Physical Function measures in comparison with core disease activity measures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults with IIM, excluding inclusion body myositis, from OMERACT Myositis Working Group (MWG) clinic sites completed PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0—Physical Function 8b measures. Core disease activity measures including patient and physician global disease activity assessments, manual muscle testing, serum creatine kinase activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were simultaneously assessed. To evaluate construct validity, a priori hypotheses for the expected correlations between PROMIS measures, age, and core disease measures were determined by &gt;70 % agreement among MWG members and were compared against observed Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency of items and floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS measures were also assessed. Subgroup analysis according to IIM subtype (dermatomyositis vs. non-dermatomyositis IIM) was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>135 adults with IIM from 5 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia were included. For construct validity, a priori hypotheses were confirmed for 5 of 6 (83 %) PROMIS Pain Interference, 4 of 5 (80 %) PROMIS Fatigue, and 3 of 4 (75 %) PROMIS Physical Function correlations. Internal consistency was high for each PROMIS measure (Cronbach's alpha &gt;0.9). Ceiling effects were observed only for PROMIS Pain Interference, with low/no pain in 29 % of patients. Subgroup analysis between dermatomyositis (<em>n</em> = 65) and non-dermatomyositis (<em>n</em> = 70) subtypes demonstrated similar correlations between PROMIS measures and disease activity measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0—Physical Function 8b measures demonstrate strong construct validity when compared to core disease activity measures in IIM, with consistent results across IIM subtypes. These findings support the use of these selected PROMIS measures to assess core domains of interest for measuring life impact in IIMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017224001744","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Validated patient-reported outcome measures to assess disease impact in patients with adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are needed. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, and Physical Function measures in comparison with core disease activity measures.

Methods

Adults with IIM, excluding inclusion body myositis, from OMERACT Myositis Working Group (MWG) clinic sites completed PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0—Physical Function 8b measures. Core disease activity measures including patient and physician global disease activity assessments, manual muscle testing, serum creatine kinase activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were simultaneously assessed. To evaluate construct validity, a priori hypotheses for the expected correlations between PROMIS measures, age, and core disease measures were determined by >70 % agreement among MWG members and were compared against observed Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency of items and floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS measures were also assessed. Subgroup analysis according to IIM subtype (dermatomyositis vs. non-dermatomyositis IIM) was performed.

Results

135 adults with IIM from 5 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia were included. For construct validity, a priori hypotheses were confirmed for 5 of 6 (83 %) PROMIS Pain Interference, 4 of 5 (80 %) PROMIS Fatigue, and 3 of 4 (75 %) PROMIS Physical Function correlations. Internal consistency was high for each PROMIS measure (Cronbach's alpha >0.9). Ceiling effects were observed only for PROMIS Pain Interference, with low/no pain in 29 % of patients. Subgroup analysis between dermatomyositis (n = 65) and non-dermatomyositis (n = 70) subtypes demonstrated similar correlations between PROMIS measures and disease activity measures.

Conclusions

PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0—Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0—Physical Function 8b measures demonstrate strong construct validity when compared to core disease activity measures in IIM, with consistent results across IIM subtypes. These findings support the use of these selected PROMIS measures to assess core domains of interest for measuring life impact in IIMs.

作为特发性炎症性肌病成人患者报告结果的 PROMIS 疼痛干扰、疲劳和身体功能的结构有效性:来自 OMERACT 肌炎工作组的一项国际研究
背景需要经过验证的患者报告结果测量方法来评估成人特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)患者的疾病影响。方法来自OMERACT肌炎工作组(MWG)诊所的成人特发性炎症性肌病(不包括包涵体肌炎)患者完成PROMIS简表v1.0-疼痛干扰6a、PROMIS简表v1.0-疲劳7a和PROMIS简表v2.0-物理功能8b测量。同时评估的核心疾病活动度包括患者和医生的总体疾病活动度评估、手动肌肉测试、血清肌酸激酶活动度和健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)。为了评估结构效度,先验假设 PROMIS 测量、年龄和核心疾病测量之间的预期相关性由工作组成员的 70% 一致意见确定,并与观察到的皮尔逊相关性进行比较。此外,还评估了项目的内部一致性以及 PROMIS 测量的下限或上限效应。根据IIM亚型(皮肌炎与非皮肌炎IIM)进行了分组分析。结果 纳入了来自北美、欧洲、亚洲和澳大利亚5个国家的135名成人IIM患者。在构造效度方面,PROMIS 疼痛干扰6项中的5项(83%)、PROMIS 疲劳5项中的4项(80%)以及PROMIS 体力功能4项中的3项(75%)的先验假设均得到了证实。每项 PROMIS 测量的内部一致性都很高(Cronbach's alpha >0.9)。仅在 PROMIS 疼痛干扰方面观察到了天花板效应,29% 的患者疼痛程度低/无疼痛。皮肌炎亚型(n = 65)和非皮肌炎亚型(n = 70)之间的分组分析表明,PROMIS测量值与疾病活动测量值之间具有相似的相关性。结论PROMIS简表v1.0-疼痛干扰6a、PROMIS简表v1.0-疲劳7a和PROMIS简表v2.0-体能8b测量值与IIM的核心疾病活动测量值相比,具有很强的建构效度,在IIM亚型中结果一致。这些研究结果支持使用这些选定的 PROMIS 测量来评估核心领域,以衡量 IIM 对生活的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信