Factors Influencing the Institutionalization of Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Literature Review.

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2024.2360315
Rahab Mbau, Anna Vassall, Lucy Gilson, Edwine Barasa
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Institutionalization of Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Literature Review.","authors":"Rahab Mbau, Anna Vassall, Lucy Gilson, Edwine Barasa","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2360315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is global interest in institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to inform resource allocation decisions. However, institutionalization of HTA remains limited particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. We conducted this scoping review to synthesize evidence on factors that influence the institutionalization of HTA at the macro (national)-level across countries globally. We searched for relevant literature in six databases namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, EconLit, and Google Scholar. We conducted the last search on December 31, 2021. We identified 77 articles that described factors that influence institutionalization of HTA across 135 high-, middle-, and low-income countries. We analyzed these articles thematically. We identified five sets of factors that influence the institutionalization of HTA across countries of different income levels. These factors include: (1) organizational resources such as organizational structures, and skilled human, financial, and information resources; (2) legal frameworks, policies, and guidelines for HTA; (3) learning and advocacy for HTA; (4) stakeholder-related factors such as stakeholders' interests, awareness, and understanding; and (5) collaborative support for HTA through international networks and non-governmental and multi-lateral organizations. Countries seeking to institutionalize HTA should map the availability of the factors identified in this review. Developing these factors wherever necessary can influence a country's capacity to institutionalize the conduct and use of HTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 3","pages":"2360315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2360315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is global interest in institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to inform resource allocation decisions. However, institutionalization of HTA remains limited particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. We conducted this scoping review to synthesize evidence on factors that influence the institutionalization of HTA at the macro (national)-level across countries globally. We searched for relevant literature in six databases namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, EconLit, and Google Scholar. We conducted the last search on December 31, 2021. We identified 77 articles that described factors that influence institutionalization of HTA across 135 high-, middle-, and low-income countries. We analyzed these articles thematically. We identified five sets of factors that influence the institutionalization of HTA across countries of different income levels. These factors include: (1) organizational resources such as organizational structures, and skilled human, financial, and information resources; (2) legal frameworks, policies, and guidelines for HTA; (3) learning and advocacy for HTA; (4) stakeholder-related factors such as stakeholders' interests, awareness, and understanding; and (5) collaborative support for HTA through international networks and non-governmental and multi-lateral organizations. Countries seeking to institutionalize HTA should map the availability of the factors identified in this review. Developing these factors wherever necessary can influence a country's capacity to institutionalize the conduct and use of HTA.

影响卫生技术评估制度化的因素:范围界定文献综述》。
全球都在关注将卫生技术评估(HTA)制度化,以便为资源分配决策提供信息。然而,特别是在低收入和中低收入国家,卫生技术评估的制度化程度仍然有限。我们进行了此次范围界定综述,以综合有关影响全球各国在宏观(国家)层面实现 HTA 制度化的因素的证据。我们在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、EconLit 和 Google Scholar 六个数据库中搜索了相关文献。最后一次检索是在 2021 年 12 月 31 日。我们在 135 个高、中、低收入国家中发现了 77 篇描述影响 HTA 制度化的因素的文章。我们对这些文章进行了专题分析。我们确定了影响不同收入水平国家 HTA 制度化的五组因素。这些因素包括(1) 组织资源,如组织结构、熟练的人力、财力和信息资源;(2) HTA 的法律框架、政策和指导方针;(3) HTA 的学习和宣传;(4) 利益相关者相关因素,如利益相关者的兴趣、意识和理解;(5) 通过国际网络、非政府组织和多边组织对 HTA 的合作支持。寻求将 HTA 制度化的国家应该对本次审查中确定的因素的可用性进行摸底。在必要时发展这些因素可影响一个国家将开展和使用 HTA 制度化的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信