The predictive value of intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring for postoperative voiding function in patients with conus medullaris and cauda equina tumors: a retrospective single center study
Xing Fan MD , Ke Li , Jiajia Liu MBBS , Xiao Wu MD , Yongzhi Wang , Wenqing Jia MD , Hui Qiao MMed
{"title":"The predictive value of intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring for postoperative voiding function in patients with conus medullaris and cauda equina tumors: a retrospective single center study","authors":"Xing Fan MD , Ke Li , Jiajia Liu MBBS , Xiao Wu MD , Yongzhi Wang , Wenqing Jia MD , Hui Qiao MMed","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>Surgical resection is the preferred treatment in most conus medullaris and cauda equina tumor (CMCET) cases. However, total resection is usually challenging to obtain and has a strong possibility of causing various complications if forcibly attempted. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has become a necessary adjunctive tool for CMCET resection.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>The current study aimed to evaluate the application value of bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring in CMCET surgery.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>A retrospective clinical study.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>The medical records of patients who underwent CMCET resection by the same neurosurgical team at our hospital from September 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. IONM was conducted in all surgeries. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, ultimately, 105 patients were enrolled in the study.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>The voiding function was assessed before surgery, 1 month after, and 6 months after surgery using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS). If the NBSS obtained 1 month after surgery exceeds 9 points than that before surgery, it can be considered that the patient suffered new-onset postoperative voiding dysfunctions (PVDs). Moreover, if the NBSS could restored (less than 9 points higher than before the surgery) at 6 months after surgery, it was defined as a short-term PVD. Otherwise, it was defined as a long-term PVD.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The amplitude reduction ratios (ARRs) of bilateral BCR waveforms were calculated and compared between patients with PVDs and those without. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was subsequently applied to determine the cut-off value of the maximal and minimal ARRs for predicting PVDs.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The maximal and minimal ARRs were significantly correlated with short-term and long-term PVDs (p<.001 for all comparisons, Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold values of maximal ARR for predicting short-term and long-term PVD were 68.80% (AUC=0.996, p<.001) and 72.10% (AUC=0.996, p<.001), respectively. While those of minimal ARR were 50.20% (AUC=0.976, p<.001) and 53.70% AUC=0.999, p<.001).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The amplitude reduction of intraoperative bilateral BCR waveforms showed high predictive value for PVDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"24 12","pages":"Pages 2314-2321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943024009410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Surgical resection is the preferred treatment in most conus medullaris and cauda equina tumor (CMCET) cases. However, total resection is usually challenging to obtain and has a strong possibility of causing various complications if forcibly attempted. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has become a necessary adjunctive tool for CMCET resection.
PURPOSE
The current study aimed to evaluate the application value of bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring in CMCET surgery.
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective clinical study.
PATIENT SAMPLE
The medical records of patients who underwent CMCET resection by the same neurosurgical team at our hospital from September 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. IONM was conducted in all surgeries. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, ultimately, 105 patients were enrolled in the study.
OUTCOME MEASURES
The voiding function was assessed before surgery, 1 month after, and 6 months after surgery using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS). If the NBSS obtained 1 month after surgery exceeds 9 points than that before surgery, it can be considered that the patient suffered new-onset postoperative voiding dysfunctions (PVDs). Moreover, if the NBSS could restored (less than 9 points higher than before the surgery) at 6 months after surgery, it was defined as a short-term PVD. Otherwise, it was defined as a long-term PVD.
METHODS
The amplitude reduction ratios (ARRs) of bilateral BCR waveforms were calculated and compared between patients with PVDs and those without. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was subsequently applied to determine the cut-off value of the maximal and minimal ARRs for predicting PVDs.
RESULTS
The maximal and minimal ARRs were significantly correlated with short-term and long-term PVDs (p<.001 for all comparisons, Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold values of maximal ARR for predicting short-term and long-term PVD were 68.80% (AUC=0.996, p<.001) and 72.10% (AUC=0.996, p<.001), respectively. While those of minimal ARR were 50.20% (AUC=0.976, p<.001) and 53.70% AUC=0.999, p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The amplitude reduction of intraoperative bilateral BCR waveforms showed high predictive value for PVDs.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.