Effect of the cone-beam CT acquisition trajectory on image quality in spine surgery: experimental cadaver study.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.016
Maxim Fikuart, Benno Bullert, Sven Y Vetter, Jochen Franke, Paul A Gruetzner, Benedict Swartman
{"title":"Effect of the cone-beam CT acquisition trajectory on image quality in spine surgery: experimental cadaver study.","authors":"Maxim Fikuart, Benno Bullert, Sven Y Vetter, Jochen Franke, Paul A Gruetzner, Benedict Swartman","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative 3D imaging with cone-beam CT (CBCT) improves assessment of implant position and reduces complications in spine surgery. It is also used for image-guided surgical techniques, resulting in improved quality of care. However, in some cases, metal artifacts can reduce image quality and make it difficult to assess pedicle screw position and reduction.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate whether a change in CBCT acquisition trajectory in relation to pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality and clinical assessability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaver study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human cadaver was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th11 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (-30° to +30°) and swivel (-25° to +25°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by 3 blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1-5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The angulated acquisition trajectory significantly increased the score for subjective image quality (p<.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p<.001) with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region (d=1.61). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality (p<.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cadaver study, the angulation as well as the swivel of the acquisition trajectory led to a significantly improved image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) with a constant isocenter. The data show that maximizing the angulation/swivel angle towards 30°/25° provides the best tested subjective image quality and enhances clinical assessability. Therefore, a correct adjustment of the acquisition trajectory can help to make intraoperative revision decisions more reliably.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The knowledge of enhanced image quality by changing the acquisition trajectory in intraoperative 3D imaging can be used for the assessment of critical screw positions in spine surgery. The implementation of this knowledge requires only a minor change of the current intraoperative imaging workflow without additional technical equipment and could further reduce the need for revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"154-164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative 3D imaging with cone-beam CT (CBCT) improves assessment of implant position and reduces complications in spine surgery. It is also used for image-guided surgical techniques, resulting in improved quality of care. However, in some cases, metal artifacts can reduce image quality and make it difficult to assess pedicle screw position and reduction.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate whether a change in CBCT acquisition trajectory in relation to pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality and clinical assessability.

Study design: Experimental cadaver study.

Methods: A human cadaver was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th11 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (-30° to +30°) and swivel (-25° to +25°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by 3 blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1-5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences.

Results: The angulated acquisition trajectory significantly increased the score for subjective image quality (p<.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p<.001) with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region (d=1.61). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality (p<.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p<.001).

Conclusions: In this cadaver study, the angulation as well as the swivel of the acquisition trajectory led to a significantly improved image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) with a constant isocenter. The data show that maximizing the angulation/swivel angle towards 30°/25° provides the best tested subjective image quality and enhances clinical assessability. Therefore, a correct adjustment of the acquisition trajectory can help to make intraoperative revision decisions more reliably.

Clinical significance: The knowledge of enhanced image quality by changing the acquisition trajectory in intraoperative 3D imaging can be used for the assessment of critical screw positions in spine surgery. The implementation of this knowledge requires only a minor change of the current intraoperative imaging workflow without additional technical equipment and could further reduce the need for revision surgery.

锥形束 CT 采集轨迹对脊柱手术图像质量的影响:尸体实验研究。
背景:使用锥束 CT(CBCT)进行术中三维成像可改善对植入物位置的评估并减少脊柱手术的并发症。它还可用于图像引导手术技术,从而提高护理质量。目的:本研究旨在探讨在背侧器械植入过程中,改变与椎弓根螺钉位置相关的 CBCT 采集轨迹是否能减少金属伪影,从而提高图像质量和临床评估能力:实验性尸体研究 方法: :在一具人体尸体的胸椎和腰椎区域(Th11 至 L5)植入椎弓根螺钉。然后,CBCT(Cios Spin,德国西门子公司)对椎弓根螺钉的采集轨迹在角度(-30°至 +30°)和旋转(-25°至 +25°)方面以 5° 为单位进行系统改变。随后,由三位具有资质的盲人评定员对图像质量进行放射学评估,共提出 9 个问题(包括解剖结构、植入物位置、伪影外观),并给出评分(1-5 分)。为了进行统计评估,将不同采集轨迹的图像质量与标准采集轨迹进行比较,检查是否存在显著差异:结果:角度采集轨迹明显提高了主观图像质量得分(p结论:在这项尸体研究中,在恒定等中心的情况下,采集轨迹的角度和旋转可明显改善术中三维成像(CBCT)的图像质量。数据显示,将角度/旋转角度最大化至 30°/25°,可提供最佳的主观图像质量,并提高临床评估能力。因此,正确调整采集轨迹有助于更可靠地做出术中翻修决定:临床意义:通过改变术中三维成像的采集轨迹来提高图像质量的知识可用于脊柱手术中关键螺钉位置的评估。临床意义:通过改变术中三维成像的采集轨迹来提高图像质量的知识可用于脊柱手术中关键螺钉位置的评估,这一知识的应用只需对目前的术中成像工作流程稍作改动,无需额外的技术设备,并可进一步减少翻修手术的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信