Trust, entrusting and the role of trustworthiness for adult survivors of child sexual abuse.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Susanna Alyce, Daniel Taggart, Jackie Turton
{"title":"Trust, entrusting and the role of trustworthiness for adult survivors of child sexual abuse.","authors":"Susanna Alyce, Daniel Taggart, Jackie Turton","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2390366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) are reported to have difficulties in trusting. Yet no previous study investigating CSA survivors' subjective experiences of trust exists and there is a paucity of clinical research into constructs and definitions of \"trust.\"</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To use a phenomenological lens to investigate CSA survivors' descriptions of trust relationships and trustworthy others by privileging their subjective experience. To better understand how trust can be built within therapeutic relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative methodology using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was conducted within the survivor-research paradigm. The researcher was a person with lived experience of CSA who co-produced the study with CSA survivor advisors and co-constructed interviews with 17 adult CSA survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings present a \"Survivor Trust Enactment Model\" that delineates the process of building/repairing relational trust and advancing \"transactional trust.\" Trust is portrayed as nuanced and formed across and according to context, including the demarcation of generalised and relational trust. The findings emphasise that trustees' trustworthiness is key to building trust which challenges assumptions that survivors are deficient in trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The foregrounding of subjective trust experiences challenges diagnostic and clinical views on trust deficiency in adult CSA survivors. The study develops clinical constructs of trust, considers implications for clinical practice, and indicates areas for further research into trust dynamics in therapeutic relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) are reported to have difficulties in trusting. Yet no previous study investigating CSA survivors' subjective experiences of trust exists and there is a paucity of clinical research into constructs and definitions of "trust."

Aims: To use a phenomenological lens to investigate CSA survivors' descriptions of trust relationships and trustworthy others by privileging their subjective experience. To better understand how trust can be built within therapeutic relationships.

Methods: A qualitative methodology using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was conducted within the survivor-research paradigm. The researcher was a person with lived experience of CSA who co-produced the study with CSA survivor advisors and co-constructed interviews with 17 adult CSA survivors.

Results: Findings present a "Survivor Trust Enactment Model" that delineates the process of building/repairing relational trust and advancing "transactional trust." Trust is portrayed as nuanced and formed across and according to context, including the demarcation of generalised and relational trust. The findings emphasise that trustees' trustworthiness is key to building trust which challenges assumptions that survivors are deficient in trust.

Conclusion: The foregrounding of subjective trust experiences challenges diagnostic and clinical views on trust deficiency in adult CSA survivors. The study develops clinical constructs of trust, considers implications for clinical practice, and indicates areas for further research into trust dynamics in therapeutic relationships.

儿童性虐待成年幸存者的信任、委托和可信度的作用。
背景:据报道,儿童性虐待(CSA)幸存者在信任方面存在困难。然而,以前没有任何研究调查过 CSA 幸存者对信任的主观体验,对 "信任 "的构建和定义的临床研究也非常少。目的:使用现象学视角,通过优先考虑 CSA 幸存者的主观体验,调查他们对信任关系和值得信任的他人的描述。更好地理解如何在治疗关系中建立信任:在幸存者研究范式下,采用解释性现象学分析法进行定性研究。研究者是一位有 CSA 生活经历的人,她与 CSA 幸存者顾问共同完成了这项研究,并与 17 位 CSA 成年幸存者共同完成了访谈:研究结果提出了 "幸存者信任实施模型",该模型描述了建立/修复关系信任和推进 "交易信任 "的过程。信任被描绘成细微差别的,并根据不同的背景形成,包括一般信任和关系信任的划分。研究结果强调,受托人的可信度是建立信任的关键,这对幸存者缺乏信任的假设提出了挑战:结论:对主观信任体验的重视挑战了关于成年 CSA 幸存者信任缺失的诊断和临床观点。该研究提出了信任的临床概念,考虑了对临床实践的影响,并指出了在治疗关系中进一步研究信任动态的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信