A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Medication-Taking Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2024-03-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2337/ds23-0038
Michael Vallis, Susie Jin, Agnieszka Klimek-Abercrombie, Ginnie Ng, Noah M Ivers
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Medication-Taking Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.","authors":"Michael Vallis, Susie Jin, Agnieszka Klimek-Abercrombie, Ginnie Ng, Noah M Ivers","doi":"10.2337/ds23-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to better understand the challenges related to type 2 diabetes medication-taking through Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-guided interviews with people with type 2 diabetes with varying degrees of medication-taking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-on-one qualitative interviews following a semistructured discussion guide informed by the TDF were conducted. Thirty people with type 2 diabetes in Canada were interviewed, with representation from across the country, of both sexes (47% female), of people with various diabetes durations (mean 12.9 ± 7.9 years), with different types of medication plans (<i>n</i> = 15 on polypharmacy), and with various medication-taking levels (<i>n</i> = 10 each for low-, medium-, and high-engagement groups).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes related to medication-taking from interviews mapped to 12 of the 14 TDF theme domains, with the exclusion of the knowledge and skills domains. The most prominent domains, as determined by high-frequency themes or themes for which people with low and high medication-taking had contrasting perspectives, were <i>1</i>) emotion; <i>2</i>) memory, attention, and decision processes; <i>3</i>) behavioral regulation; <i>4</i>) beliefs about consequences; <i>5</i>) goals; and <i>6</i>) environmental context and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through our interviews, several areas of focus emerged that may help efforts to increase medication-taking. To validate these findings, future quantitative research is warranted to help support people with type 2 diabetes in overcoming psychological and behavioral barriers to medication-taking.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11327164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds23-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to better understand the challenges related to type 2 diabetes medication-taking through Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-guided interviews with people with type 2 diabetes with varying degrees of medication-taking.

Methods: One-on-one qualitative interviews following a semistructured discussion guide informed by the TDF were conducted. Thirty people with type 2 diabetes in Canada were interviewed, with representation from across the country, of both sexes (47% female), of people with various diabetes durations (mean 12.9 ± 7.9 years), with different types of medication plans (n = 15 on polypharmacy), and with various medication-taking levels (n = 10 each for low-, medium-, and high-engagement groups).

Results: Themes related to medication-taking from interviews mapped to 12 of the 14 TDF theme domains, with the exclusion of the knowledge and skills domains. The most prominent domains, as determined by high-frequency themes or themes for which people with low and high medication-taking had contrasting perspectives, were 1) emotion; 2) memory, attention, and decision processes; 3) behavioral regulation; 4) beliefs about consequences; 5) goals; and 6) environmental context and resources.

Conclusion: Through our interviews, several areas of focus emerged that may help efforts to increase medication-taking. To validate these findings, future quantitative research is warranted to help support people with type 2 diabetes in overcoming psychological and behavioral barriers to medication-taking.

利用理论领域框架对 2 型糖尿病患者服药障碍的定性研究。
目的:我们旨在通过理论领域框架(TDF)指导下的访谈,更好地了解与 2 型糖尿病服药相关的挑战:方法:按照以 TDF 为基础的半结构化讨论指南进行一对一定性访谈。30 名加拿大 2 型糖尿病患者接受了访谈,他们来自全国各地,男女均有(47% 为女性),糖尿病病程长短不一(平均为 12.9 ± 7.9 年),有不同类型的用药计划(15 人使用多种药物),服药水平各异(低、中、高参与组各 10 人):访谈中与服药相关的主题与 14 个 TDF 主题领域中的 12 个相吻合,但不包括知识和技能领域。根据高频主题或药物服用量低和药物服用量高的人观点截然不同的主题,最突出的领域是:1)情绪;2)记忆、注意力和决策过程;3)行为调节;4)对后果的信念;5)目标;6)环境背景和资源:通过访谈,我们发现了几个可能有助于提高服药率的重点领域。为了验证这些发现,我们有必要在未来开展定量研究,帮助 2 型糖尿病患者克服服药过程中的心理和行为障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信