Jie Yang, Jonathan So, Hao Zhang, Simon Jones, Denise M Connolly, Claudia Golding, Esmelin Griffes, Adam C Szerencsy, Tzer Jason Wu, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs, Vincent J Major
{"title":"Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based workflow for the prioritization of patient portal messages.","authors":"Jie Yang, Jonathan So, Hao Zhang, Simon Jones, Denise M Connolly, Claudia Golding, Esmelin Griffes, Adam C Szerencsy, Tzer Jason Wu, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs, Vincent J Major","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accelerating demand for patient messaging has impacted the practice of many providers. Messages are not recommended for urgent medical issues, but some do require rapid attention. This presents an opportunity for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to prioritize review of messages. Our study aimed to highlight some patient portal messages for prioritized review using a custom AI system integrated into the electronic health record (EHR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We developed a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based large language model using 40 132 patient-sent messages to identify patterns involving high acuity topics that warrant an immediate callback. The model was then implemented into 2 shared pools of patient messages managed by dozens of registered nurses. A primary outcome, such as the time before messages were read, was evaluated with a difference-in-difference methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model validation on an expert-reviewed dataset (<i>n</i> = 7260) yielded very promising performance (C-statistic = 97%, average-precision = 72%). A binarized output (precision = 67%, sensitivity = 63%) was integrated into the EHR for 2 years. In a pre-post analysis (<i>n</i> = 396 466), an improvement exceeding the trend was observed in the time high-scoring messages sit unread (21 minutes, 63 vs 42 for messages sent outside business hours).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our work shows great promise in improving care when AI is aligned with human workflow. Future work involves audience expansion, aiding users with suggested actions, and drafting responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients utilize patient portal messages, and while most messages are routine, a small fraction describe alarming symptoms. Our AI-based workflow shortens the turnaround time to get a trained clinician to review these messages to provide safer, higher-quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Accelerating demand for patient messaging has impacted the practice of many providers. Messages are not recommended for urgent medical issues, but some do require rapid attention. This presents an opportunity for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to prioritize review of messages. Our study aimed to highlight some patient portal messages for prioritized review using a custom AI system integrated into the electronic health record (EHR).
Materials and methods: We developed a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based large language model using 40 132 patient-sent messages to identify patterns involving high acuity topics that warrant an immediate callback. The model was then implemented into 2 shared pools of patient messages managed by dozens of registered nurses. A primary outcome, such as the time before messages were read, was evaluated with a difference-in-difference methodology.
Results: Model validation on an expert-reviewed dataset (n = 7260) yielded very promising performance (C-statistic = 97%, average-precision = 72%). A binarized output (precision = 67%, sensitivity = 63%) was integrated into the EHR for 2 years. In a pre-post analysis (n = 396 466), an improvement exceeding the trend was observed in the time high-scoring messages sit unread (21 minutes, 63 vs 42 for messages sent outside business hours).
Discussion: Our work shows great promise in improving care when AI is aligned with human workflow. Future work involves audience expansion, aiding users with suggested actions, and drafting responses.
Conclusion: Many patients utilize patient portal messages, and while most messages are routine, a small fraction describe alarming symptoms. Our AI-based workflow shortens the turnaround time to get a trained clinician to review these messages to provide safer, higher-quality care.