HIV Self-Testing for Efficient PrEP Delivery Is Highly Acceptable and Feasible in Public Health HIV Clinics in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Vallery Ogello, Kenneth Ngure, Paul Mwangi, Emmah Owidi, Njeri Wairimu, Lydia Etyang, Margaret Mwangi, Dominic Mwangi, Simon Maina, Nelly Mugo, Kenneth Mugwanya
{"title":"HIV Self-Testing for Efficient PrEP Delivery Is Highly Acceptable and Feasible in Public Health HIV Clinics in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Vallery Ogello, Kenneth Ngure, Paul Mwangi, Emmah Owidi, Njeri Wairimu, Lydia Etyang, Margaret Mwangi, Dominic Mwangi, Simon Maina, Nelly Mugo, Kenneth Mugwanya","doi":"10.1177/23259582241274311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to reduce barriers associated with clinic-based preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery. We conducted a substudy nested in a prospective, pilot implementation study evaluating patient-centered differentiated care services. Clients chose either a blood-based or oral fluid HIVST kit at the first refill visit. Data were abstracted from program files and surveys were administered to clients. We purposively sampled a subset of PrEP clients and their providers to participate in in-depth interviews. We surveyed (<i>n</i> = 285). A majority (269/285, 94%) reported HIV risk. Blood-based HIVST was perceived as easy to use (76/140, 54%), and (41/140, 29%) perceived it to be more accurate. Oral fluid-based HIVST was perceived to be easy to use (95/107, 89%), but almost all (106/107, 99%) perceived it as less accurate. HIVST improved privacy, reduced workload, and saved time. HIVST demonstrates the potential to streamline facility-based PrEP care in busy African public health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"23259582241274311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582241274311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to reduce barriers associated with clinic-based preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery. We conducted a substudy nested in a prospective, pilot implementation study evaluating patient-centered differentiated care services. Clients chose either a blood-based or oral fluid HIVST kit at the first refill visit. Data were abstracted from program files and surveys were administered to clients. We purposively sampled a subset of PrEP clients and their providers to participate in in-depth interviews. We surveyed (n = 285). A majority (269/285, 94%) reported HIV risk. Blood-based HIVST was perceived as easy to use (76/140, 54%), and (41/140, 29%) perceived it to be more accurate. Oral fluid-based HIVST was perceived to be easy to use (95/107, 89%), but almost all (106/107, 99%) perceived it as less accurate. HIVST improved privacy, reduced workload, and saved time. HIVST demonstrates the potential to streamline facility-based PrEP care in busy African public health facilities.

在肯尼亚的公共卫生 HIV 诊所中,为高效提供 PrEP 而进行 HIV 自我检测具有很高的可接受性和可行性:一项混合方法研究。
艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)有可能减少与诊所提供暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)相关的障碍。我们在一项评估以患者为中心的差异化护理服务的前瞻性试点实施研究中开展了一项嵌套子研究。客户在首次补液时选择血液或口服液 HIVST 套件。我们从项目档案中抽取了数据,并对客户进行了问卷调查。我们有目的地抽取了一部分 PrEP 客户及其医疗服务提供者参与深度访谈。我们进行了调查(n = 285)。大多数人(269/285,94%)报告了 HIV 风险。血液 HIVST 被认为易于使用(76/140,54%),并且(41/140,29%)认为其更为准确。口服液式艾滋病毒检测被认为易于使用(95/107,89%),但几乎所有人(106/107,99%)都认为其准确性较低。HIVST 改善了隐私,减少了工作量,节省了时间。HIVST 证明了在繁忙的非洲公共卫生机构中简化基于设施的 PrEP 护理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信