Bayesian sparse regression for exposure-response analyses of efficacy and safety endpoints to justify the clinical dose of valemetostat for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Abstract

Valemetostat is an oral inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH) 2 and EZH1 approved in Japan for the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). To support the approved daily dose of 200 mg and inform dose adjustments in patients with ATLL, Bayesian exposure-response analyses were conducted using data from two clinical trials. The analyses included two efficacy endpoints, overall response by central and investigator assessments in patients with ATLL (n = 38, 150-200 mg), and six safety endpoints in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 102, 150-300 mg), which included grade ≥3 laboratory values for anemia, absolute neutrophil count decreased, and platelet count decreased; any grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); and dose reductions and dose interruptions due to TEAEs. A slightly positive relationship was observed between unbound exposure and efficacy endpoints. A steeper relationship was observed in safety endpoints, compared with efficacy. Candidate covariate effects, except intercepts of the baseline laboratory values, were regularized via spike and slab priors in a Bayesian framework; only the laboratory values for corresponding hematologic TEAEs were shown to be of substantial impact. The target exposure range was established by defining a modified region of practical equivalence (184-887 ng·h/mL), which was expected to provide satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety within the range of available exposure data. The simulated exposure range considering inter-individual variability showed that 200 mg could reach target exposure in the overall population and across subpopulations of interest, supporting the use of valemetostat 200 mg in patients with ATLL.