Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients With Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Recruited From Korean Centers: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA TRAVERSE Trial.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Chin Kook Rhee, Jung-Won Park, Heung-Woo Park, Hayeon Noh, Jerome Msihid, You Sook Cho
{"title":"Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients With Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Recruited From Korean Centers: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA TRAVERSE Trial.","authors":"Chin Kook Rhee, Jung-Won Park, Heung-Woo Park, Hayeon Noh, Jerome Msihid, You Sook Cho","doi":"10.4168/aair.2024.16.4.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Long-term data are limited on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma from Korea. The current subgroup analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients enrolled from Korean centers in the parent studies (phase 2b and QUEST) and who participated in the TRAVERSE open-label extension (OLE) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRAVERSE was a global, multicenter, OLE study that assessed the safety and efficacy of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks in patients (n = 2,282) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma who completed prior dupilumab asthma clinical trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the secondary outcomes included annualized severe exacerbation rate, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Safety outcomes were consistent with the parent studies and the overall TRAVERSE population; out of 74 patients, 70 experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, and 6 (8.1%) discontinued because of adverse events. During the treatment period, the unadjusted annualized severe exacerbation rate was low (0.470). Improvement in pre-BD FEV1 was seen as early as Week 2 with a mean change from the parent study baseline (PSBL), standard deviation (SD) of 0.42 L (0.47), which was sustained until Week 96. Mean change from PSBL (SD) in ACQ-5 score was -1.32 (0.76) at Week 48.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This subgroup analysis of TRAVERSE showed the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma enrolled from Korean centers.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134028.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"16 4","pages":"372-386"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.4.372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Long-term data are limited on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma from Korea. The current subgroup analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients enrolled from Korean centers in the parent studies (phase 2b and QUEST) and who participated in the TRAVERSE open-label extension (OLE) study.

Methods: TRAVERSE was a global, multicenter, OLE study that assessed the safety and efficacy of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks in patients (n = 2,282) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma who completed prior dupilumab asthma clinical trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the secondary outcomes included annualized severe exacerbation rate, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score.

Results: Safety outcomes were consistent with the parent studies and the overall TRAVERSE population; out of 74 patients, 70 experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, and 6 (8.1%) discontinued because of adverse events. During the treatment period, the unadjusted annualized severe exacerbation rate was low (0.470). Improvement in pre-BD FEV1 was seen as early as Week 2 with a mean change from the parent study baseline (PSBL), standard deviation (SD) of 0.42 L (0.47), which was sustained until Week 96. Mean change from PSBL (SD) in ACQ-5 score was -1.32 (0.76) at Week 48.

Conclusions: This subgroup analysis of TRAVERSE showed the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma enrolled from Korean centers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134028.

韩国中心招募的未获控制的中重度哮喘患者使用杜匹单抗的长期安全性和疗效:LIBERTY ASTHMA TRAVERSE 试验 3 期分组分析》。
目的:有关韩国未受控制的中重度哮喘患者使用杜匹单抗的安全性和疗效的长期数据有限。目前的亚组分析旨在评估韩国中心在母研究(2b 期和 QUEST)中登记并参与 TRAVERSE 开放标签扩展(OLE)研究的患者使用杜比鲁单抗的长期安全性和疗效:TRAVERSE是一项全球性、多中心、OLE研究,该研究评估了在之前完成了dupilumab哮喘临床试验的未受控制的中重度哮喘患者(n = 2,282)中,dupilumab 300 mg每2周1次、疗程长达96周的安全性和有效性。主要结果是任何治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)的发生率;次要结果包括年化严重恶化率、支气管扩张前1秒用力呼气容积(BD前FEV1)和5项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5)评分:74名患者中,70人出现了≥1次TEAE,6人(8.1%)因不良事件而停药。在治疗期间,未经调整的年化严重恶化率较低(0.470)。早在第 2 周,BD 前的 FEV1 就有所改善,与母研究基线(PSBL)相比的平均变化(标准差)为 0.42 升(0.47),这种改善一直持续到第 96 周。第48周时,ACQ-5评分与PSBL相比的平均变化(标准差)为-1.32(0.76):TRAVERSE的这项亚组分析表明,在韩国各中心登记的未受控制的中重度哮喘患者中,dupilumab具有长期安全性和有效性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02134028。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信