How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Haolin Chen , Xiaohua Zhao , Chen Chen , Zhenlong Li , Haijian Li , Jianguo Gong
{"title":"How to define the threshold of takeover response ability of different drivers in conditional automated driving","authors":"Haolin Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Zhao ,&nbsp;Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Zhenlong Li ,&nbsp;Haijian Li ,&nbsp;Jianguo Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers’ takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers’ readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (<em>R<sup>2</sup></em> &gt; 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTC<em><sub>min</sub></em> to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy &gt; 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver’s takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"106 ","pages":"Pages 179-198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In conditional automated driving, the takeover response ability threshold is necessary for driver qualification assessment and liability division of automated vehicle accidents. The primary objective of this study is to establish a clear and quantifiable threshold for drivers’ takeover response ability in conditional automated driving scenarios. This threshold aims to serve as a benchmark for evaluating drivers’ readiness and developing safety regulations in automated driving. We designed 18 takeover events and invited 42 drivers to participate in the driving simulation experiment, and obtained their takeover time data. First, we analyze the differences of takeover time among drivers with different attributes (gender, age, driving year). Second, based on the Peaks Over Threshold and the generalized Pareto distribution model, we use the graphic method to calculate the range of takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes. The result shows that the difference in the threshold range of takeover time between male and female drivers is relatively tiny. There are differences in the threshold range of takeover time for different age drivers, and the threshold is negatively correlated with age. Drivers with high driving experience within a safe range are allowed to have longer takeover times. Finally, the rationality of the takeover time threshold for drivers with different attributes has been verified. The return level curves are approximately linear (R2 > 0.77), indicating that the GPD model can capture the overall trend of the return level, which is changing with the probability level. This proves that the takeover time threshold is reasonable. This study uses TTCmin to calibrate takeover safety, and the takeover time threshold has a good classification performance for takeover safety (accuracy > 85 %). The above content proves the rationality of the takeover time threshold. The contribution of this study is to calculate the takeover time threshold of drivers with different attributes, which can help regulatory authorities assess the driver’s takeover response ability and support the liability division of automated vehicle accidents.

如何定义有条件自动驾驶中不同驾驶员接管响应能力的阈值
在有条件自动驾驶中,接管反应能力阈值是驾驶员资质评估和自动驾驶汽车事故责任划分的必要条件。本研究的主要目的是为驾驶员在有条件自动驾驶场景中的接管反应能力建立一个明确且可量化的阈值。该阈值旨在作为评估驾驶员准备情况和制定自动驾驶安全法规的基准。我们设计了 18 个接管事件,邀请了 42 名驾驶员参与驾驶模拟实验,并获得了他们的接管时间数据。首先,我们分析了不同属性(性别、年龄、驾驶年份)驾驶员接管时间的差异。其次,基于峰值超过阈值和广义帕累托分布模型,利用图解法计算不同属性驾驶员的接管时间阈值范围。结果表明,男女驾驶员接管时间阈值范围的差异相对较小。不同年龄驾驶员的接管时间阈值范围存在差异,且阈值与年龄呈负相关。在安全范围内,驾驶经验丰富的驾驶员可以有更长的接管时间。最后,还验证了不同属性驾驶员接管时间阈值的合理性。回程水平曲线近似线性(R2 >0.77),表明 GPD 模型可以捕捉到回程水平的整体趋势,即随着概率水平的变化而变化。这证明接管时间阈值是合理的。本研究采用 TTCmin 标定接管安全性,接管时间阈值对接管安全性具有较好的分类性能(准确率 > 85 %)。以上内容证明了接管时间阈值的合理性。本研究的贡献在于计算了不同属性驾驶员的接管时间阈值,有助于监管部门评估驾驶员的接管响应能力,为自动驾驶汽车事故责任划分提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信