Development of a core domain set for nailfold capillaroscopy reporting

{"title":"Development of a core domain set for nailfold capillaroscopy reporting","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The peripheral microangiopathy may be well evaluated and studied by nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) which is a safe and non-invasive technique. NFC has been reported to have both diagnostic and prognostic values in patients presenting with Raynaud's phenomenon.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The overarching objective of this work was to make a consensus on what domains should be included in a capillaroscopy report and that it can be used in daily clinical practice and clinical research in the area of rheumatology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Delphi questionnaire was developed regarding capillaroscopy report from a literature review and expert consensus. The first Delphi round included 14 core areas, its 18 domains with 50 subdomains, derived from a systematic literature review. The level of evidence was determined for each core set using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. Nine response categories have been set per each item ranging between 1 and 9. Round 2, aimed to reach preliminary consensus “in” or “out” for domains. It included all items that were rated “critical” by at least 80% of the participants as well as any new domains proposed in round 1.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants to the first, and second round were 11 experts. Fourteen domains were discussed in the two rounds. At the end of the survey, the final report template of NFC in rheumatology reached a consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A nailfold capillaroscopy report template has been developed by this study, based on outcomes of a Delphi process, by international participants panel. All domains met the 80% voting threshold set in this work. The reporting template can be used for both clinical research as well as day to day practice to provide guidance and standardize the NFC reporting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574324000959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The peripheral microangiopathy may be well evaluated and studied by nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) which is a safe and non-invasive technique. NFC has been reported to have both diagnostic and prognostic values in patients presenting with Raynaud's phenomenon.

Objective

The overarching objective of this work was to make a consensus on what domains should be included in a capillaroscopy report and that it can be used in daily clinical practice and clinical research in the area of rheumatology.

Methods

A Delphi questionnaire was developed regarding capillaroscopy report from a literature review and expert consensus. The first Delphi round included 14 core areas, its 18 domains with 50 subdomains, derived from a systematic literature review. The level of evidence was determined for each core set using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. Nine response categories have been set per each item ranging between 1 and 9. Round 2, aimed to reach preliminary consensus “in” or “out” for domains. It included all items that were rated “critical” by at least 80% of the participants as well as any new domains proposed in round 1.

Results

The participants to the first, and second round were 11 experts. Fourteen domains were discussed in the two rounds. At the end of the survey, the final report template of NFC in rheumatology reached a consensus.

Conclusion

A nailfold capillaroscopy report template has been developed by this study, based on outcomes of a Delphi process, by international participants panel. All domains met the 80% voting threshold set in this work. The reporting template can be used for both clinical research as well as day to day practice to provide guidance and standardize the NFC reporting.

开发用于甲襞毛细血管镜检查报告的核心域集
背景通过甲襞毛细血管镜(NFC)可以很好地评估和研究外周微血管病变,这是一种安全无创的技术。这项工作的首要目标是就毛细血管镜检查报告应包括哪些领域达成共识,并将其应用于风湿病学领域的日常临床实践和临床研究。第一轮德尔菲调查包括 14 个核心领域、18 个领域和 50 个子领域,均来自系统性文献综述。采用牛津循证医学中心(CEBM)系统确定了每个核心领域的证据级别。每个项目设置了九个响应类别,从 1 到 9 不等。第二轮旨在就 "纳入 "或 "排除 "领域达成初步共识。第一轮和第二轮共有 11 位专家参加。两轮共讨论了 14 个领域。在调查结束时,风湿病学 NFC 的最终报告模板达成了共识。结论本研究根据德尔菲过程的结果,由国际参与者小组开发了甲床毛细血管镜检查报告模板。所有领域都达到了本研究设定的 80% 投票阈值。该报告模板可用于临床研究和日常实践,为 NFC 报告提供指导并使其标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信