Ashokkumar Singaravelu , Jeffrey Dalli , Shirley Potter , Ronan A. Cahill
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for optimum tissue excision with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for flap reconstructions: Proof of concept","authors":"Ashokkumar Singaravelu , Jeffrey Dalli , Shirley Potter , Ronan A. Cahill","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) is gaining popularity as an intraoperative tool to assess flap perfusion. However, it needs interpretation and there is concern regarding a potential for over-debridement with its use. Here we describe an artificial intelligence (AI) method that indicates the extent of flap trimming required.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Operative ICGFA recordings from ten consenting patients undergoing flap reconstruction without subsequent partial/total necrosis as part of an approved prospective study (NCT 04220242, Institutional Review Board Ref:1/378/2092), provided the training-testing datasets. Drawing from prior similar experience with ICGFA intestinal perfusion signal analysis, five fluorescence intensity and time-related features were analysed (MATLAB R2024a) from stabilised ICGFA imagery. Machine learning model training (with ten-fold cross-validation application) was grounded on the actual trimming by a consultant plastic surgeon (S.P.) experienced in ICGFA. MATLAB classification learner app was used to identify the most important feature and generate partial dependence plots for interpretability during training. Testing involved post-hoc application to unseen videos blinded to surgeon ICGFA interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Training:testing datasets comprised 7:3 ICGFA videos with 28 and 3 sampled lines respectively. Validation and testing accuracy were 99.9 % and 99.3 % respectively. Maximum fluorescence intensity identified as the most important predictive curve feature. Partial dependence plotting revealed a threshold of 22.1 grayscale units and regions with maximum intensity less then threshold being more likely to be predicted as “excise”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI method proved discriminative regarding indicating whether to retain or excise peripheral flap portions. Additional prospective patients and expert references are needed to validate generalisability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 389-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001165/pdfft?md5=bef7b13ed590fd480f311d2ba8ee6387&pid=1-s2.0-S2352587824001165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) is gaining popularity as an intraoperative tool to assess flap perfusion. However, it needs interpretation and there is concern regarding a potential for over-debridement with its use. Here we describe an artificial intelligence (AI) method that indicates the extent of flap trimming required.
Methods
Operative ICGFA recordings from ten consenting patients undergoing flap reconstruction without subsequent partial/total necrosis as part of an approved prospective study (NCT 04220242, Institutional Review Board Ref:1/378/2092), provided the training-testing datasets. Drawing from prior similar experience with ICGFA intestinal perfusion signal analysis, five fluorescence intensity and time-related features were analysed (MATLAB R2024a) from stabilised ICGFA imagery. Machine learning model training (with ten-fold cross-validation application) was grounded on the actual trimming by a consultant plastic surgeon (S.P.) experienced in ICGFA. MATLAB classification learner app was used to identify the most important feature and generate partial dependence plots for interpretability during training. Testing involved post-hoc application to unseen videos blinded to surgeon ICGFA interpretation.
Results
Training:testing datasets comprised 7:3 ICGFA videos with 28 and 3 sampled lines respectively. Validation and testing accuracy were 99.9 % and 99.3 % respectively. Maximum fluorescence intensity identified as the most important predictive curve feature. Partial dependence plotting revealed a threshold of 22.1 grayscale units and regions with maximum intensity less then threshold being more likely to be predicted as “excise”.
Conclusion
The AI method proved discriminative regarding indicating whether to retain or excise peripheral flap portions. Additional prospective patients and expert references are needed to validate generalisability.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.