Machine Learning Methods for Precision Dosing in Anticancer Drug Therapy: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Olga Teplytska, Moritz Ernst, Luca Marie Koltermann, Diego Valderrama, Elena Trunz, Marc Vaisband, Jan Hasenauer, Holger Fröhlich, Ulrich Jaehde
{"title":"Machine Learning Methods for Precision Dosing in Anticancer Drug Therapy: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Olga Teplytska, Moritz Ernst, Luca Marie Koltermann, Diego Valderrama, Elena Trunz, Marc Vaisband, Jan Hasenauer, Holger Fröhlich, Ulrich Jaehde","doi":"10.1007/s40262-024-01409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the last decade, various Machine Learning techniques have been proposed aiming to individualise the dose of anticancer drugs mostly based on a presumed drug effect or measured effect biomarkers. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively summarise the research status on the use of Machine Learning for precision dosing in anticancer drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the interim guidance by Cochrane and the Joanna Briggs Institute. We systematically searched the databases Medline (via PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Library for research articles and reviews including results published after 2016. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 relevant studies was identified. In 12 of the included studies, Reinforcement Learning methods were used, including Classical, Deep, Double Deep and Conservative Q-Learning and Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning. Furthermore, classical Machine Learning methods were compared in terms of their performance and an artificial intelligence platform based on parabolic equations was used to guide dosing prospectively and retrospectively, albeit only in a limited number of patients. Due to the significantly different algorithm structures, a meaningful comparison between the various Machine Learning approaches was not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this review emphasises the clinical relevance of Machine Learning methods for anticancer drug dose optimisation, as many algorithms have shown promising results enabling model-free predictions with the potential to maximise efficacy and minimise toxicity when compared to standard protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01409-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the last decade, various Machine Learning techniques have been proposed aiming to individualise the dose of anticancer drugs mostly based on a presumed drug effect or measured effect biomarkers. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively summarise the research status on the use of Machine Learning for precision dosing in anticancer drug therapy.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the interim guidance by Cochrane and the Joanna Briggs Institute. We systematically searched the databases Medline (via PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Library for research articles and reviews including results published after 2016. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

Results: A total of 17 relevant studies was identified. In 12 of the included studies, Reinforcement Learning methods were used, including Classical, Deep, Double Deep and Conservative Q-Learning and Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning. Furthermore, classical Machine Learning methods were compared in terms of their performance and an artificial intelligence platform based on parabolic equations was used to guide dosing prospectively and retrospectively, albeit only in a limited number of patients. Due to the significantly different algorithm structures, a meaningful comparison between the various Machine Learning approaches was not possible.

Conclusion: Overall, this review emphasises the clinical relevance of Machine Learning methods for anticancer drug dose optimisation, as many algorithms have shown promising results enabling model-free predictions with the potential to maximise efficacy and minimise toxicity when compared to standard protocols.

Abstract Image

抗癌药物精准剂量的机器学习方法:范围综述》。
简介在过去十年中,人们提出了各种机器学习技术,其目的主要是根据推测的药物效果或测量的效果生物标志物来个体化抗癌药物的剂量。本范围综述旨在全面总结机器学习技术在抗癌药物治疗中精准用药方面的研究现状:本范围界定综述根据 Cochrane 和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的临时指南进行。我们系统地检索了 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆等数据库中的研究文章和综述,包括 2016 年之后发表的结果。结果按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述》(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行报告:共确定了 17 项相关研究。其中 12 项研究使用了强化学习方法,包括经典强化学习、深度强化学习、双深度强化学习、保守 Q 学习和模糊强化学习。此外,还对经典机器学习方法的性能进行了比较,并使用了基于抛物线方程的人工智能平台来指导前瞻性和回顾性用药,尽管仅用于数量有限的患者。由于算法结构大相径庭,因此无法对各种机器学习方法进行有意义的比较:总之,这篇综述强调了机器学习方法在抗癌药物剂量优化方面的临床意义,因为许多算法都显示出了很好的效果,与标准方案相比,无模型预测有可能最大限度地提高疗效和降低毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信