Immune-based Machine learning Prediction of Diagnosis and Illness State in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Immune-based Machine learning Prediction of Diagnosis and Illness State in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder frequently face significant delay in diagnosis, leading to being missed or misdiagnosed in early stages. Both disorders have also been associated with trait and state immune abnormalities. Recent machine learning-based studies have shown encouraging results using diagnostic biomarkers in predictive models, but few have focused on immune-based markers. Our main objective was to develop supervised machine learning models to predict diagnosis and illness state in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using only a panel of peripheral kynurenine metabolites and cytokines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cross-sectional I-GIVE cohort included hospitalized acute bipolar patients (n = 205), stable bipolar outpatients (n = 116), hospitalized acute schizophrenia patients (n = 111), stable schizophrenia outpatients (n = 75) and healthy controls (n = 185). Serum kynurenine metabolites, namely tryptophan (TRP), kynurenine (KYN), kynurenic acid (KA), quinaldic acid (QUINA), xanthurenic acid (XA), quinolinic acid (QUINO) and picolinic acid (PICO) were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), while V-plex Human Cytokine Assays were used to measure cytokines (interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-17, IL-12/IL23-P40, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)). Supervised machine learning models were performed using JMP Pro 17.0.0. We compared a primary analysis using nested cross-validation to a split set as sensitivity analysis. Post-hoc, we re-ran the models using only the significant features to obtain the key markers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The models yielded a good Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.804, Positive Prediction Value (PPV) = 86.95; Negative Prediction Value (NPV) = 54.61) for distinguishing all patients from controls. This implies that a positive test is highly accurate in identifying the patients, but a negative test is inconclusive. Both schizophrenia patients and bipolar patients could each be separated from controls with a good accuracy (SCZ AUC 0.824; BD AUC 0.802). Overall, increased levels of IL-6, TNF-ɑ and PICO and decreased levels of IFN-γ and QUINO were predictive for an individual being classified as a patient. Classification of acute versus stable patients reached a fair AUC of 0.713. The differentiation between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder yielded a poor AUC of 0.627.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the potential of using immune-based measures to build predictive classification models in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with IL-6, TNF-ɑ, IFN-γ, QUINO and PICO as key candidates. While machine learning models successfully distinguished schizophrenia and bipolar disorder from controls, the challenges in differentiating schizophrenic from bipolar patients likely reflect shared immunological pathways by the both disorders and confounding by a larger state-specific effect. Larger multi-centric studies and multi-domain models are needed to enhance reliability and translation into clinic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159124005373/pdfft?md5=845777c8c07335f78b4af34dce7bd815&pid=1-s2.0-S0889159124005373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159124005373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder frequently face significant delay in diagnosis, leading to being missed or misdiagnosed in early stages. Both disorders have also been associated with trait and state immune abnormalities. Recent machine learning-based studies have shown encouraging results using diagnostic biomarkers in predictive models, but few have focused on immune-based markers. Our main objective was to develop supervised machine learning models to predict diagnosis and illness state in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using only a panel of peripheral kynurenine metabolites and cytokines.

Methods

The cross-sectional I-GIVE cohort included hospitalized acute bipolar patients (n = 205), stable bipolar outpatients (n = 116), hospitalized acute schizophrenia patients (n = 111), stable schizophrenia outpatients (n = 75) and healthy controls (n = 185). Serum kynurenine metabolites, namely tryptophan (TRP), kynurenine (KYN), kynurenic acid (KA), quinaldic acid (QUINA), xanthurenic acid (XA), quinolinic acid (QUINO) and picolinic acid (PICO) were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), while V-plex Human Cytokine Assays were used to measure cytokines (interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-17, IL-12/IL23-P40, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)). Supervised machine learning models were performed using JMP Pro 17.0.0. We compared a primary analysis using nested cross-validation to a split set as sensitivity analysis. Post-hoc, we re-ran the models using only the significant features to obtain the key markers.

Results

The models yielded a good Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.804, Positive Prediction Value (PPV) = 86.95; Negative Prediction Value (NPV) = 54.61) for distinguishing all patients from controls. This implies that a positive test is highly accurate in identifying the patients, but a negative test is inconclusive. Both schizophrenia patients and bipolar patients could each be separated from controls with a good accuracy (SCZ AUC 0.824; BD AUC 0.802). Overall, increased levels of IL-6, TNF-ɑ and PICO and decreased levels of IFN-γ and QUINO were predictive for an individual being classified as a patient. Classification of acute versus stable patients reached a fair AUC of 0.713. The differentiation between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder yielded a poor AUC of 0.627.

Conclusions

This study highlights the potential of using immune-based measures to build predictive classification models in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with IL-6, TNF-ɑ, IFN-γ, QUINO and PICO as key candidates. While machine learning models successfully distinguished schizophrenia and bipolar disorder from controls, the challenges in differentiating schizophrenic from bipolar patients likely reflect shared immunological pathways by the both disorders and confounding by a larger state-specific effect. Larger multi-centric studies and multi-domain models are needed to enhance reliability and translation into clinic.

基于免疫的机器学习预测精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的诊断和疾病状态。
背景:精神分裂症和躁郁症在诊断上经常面临严重的延误,导致早期漏诊或误诊。这两种疾病还与特质和状态免疫异常有关。最近基于机器学习的研究表明,在预测模型中使用诊断生物标记物取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但很少有人关注基于免疫的标记物。我们的主要目标是开发有监督的机器学习模型,仅使用一组外周犬尿氨酸代谢物和细胞因子来预测精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的诊断和疾病状态:横断面 I-GIVE 队列包括住院的急性双相情感障碍患者(n = 205)、稳定的双相情感障碍门诊患者(n = 116)、住院的急性精神分裂症患者(n = 111)、稳定的精神分裂症门诊患者(n = 75)和健康对照组(n = 185)。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)对血清犬尿氨酸代谢物,即色氨酸(TRP)、犬尿氨酸(KYN)、犬尿酸(KA)、喹啉二酸(QUINA)、黄脲酸(XA)、喹啉酸(QUINO)和吡啶羧酸(PICO)进行了定量分析、V-plex 人类细胞因子测定法用于检测细胞因子(白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、IL-8、IL-17、IL-12/IL23-P40、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-ɑ)、干扰素-γ (IFN-γ))。使用 JMP Pro 17.0.0 对机器学习模型进行了监督。 作为敏感性分析,我们比较了使用嵌套交叉验证的主要分析和分裂集。事后,我们仅使用重要特征重新运行模型,以获得关键标记:这些模型在区分所有患者和对照组方面取得了良好的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.804,阳性预测值(PPV)= 86.95;阴性预测值(NPV)= 54.61)。这意味着,阳性检测在鉴别患者方面准确性很高,而阴性检测则无法确定。精神分裂症患者和躁郁症患者都能以较高的准确度从对照组中区分出来(SCZ AUC 0.824;BD AUC 0.802)。总体而言,IL-6、TNF-ɑ 和 PICO 水平的升高以及 IFN-γ 和 QUINO 水平的降低可预测患者的分类。急性期与稳定期患者的分类达到了 0.713 的公平 AUC。区分精神分裂症和躁狂症的AUC为0.627,较差:本研究强调了利用免疫指标建立精神分裂症和双相情感障碍预测分类模型的潜力,IL-6、TNF-ɑ、IFN-γ、QUINO 和 PICO 是主要候选指标。虽然机器学习模型成功地将精神分裂症和双相情感障碍与对照组区分开来,但将精神分裂症患者与双相情感障碍患者区分开来所面临的挑战可能反映了这两种疾病的共同免疫途径,以及更大的特定状态效应的干扰。需要进行更大规模的多中心研究和多领域模型,以提高可靠性并将其应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals. As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信