Voices of experience: what Dutch parents teach us about values and intuition in periviable decisions.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Angret de Boer, Lien De Proost, Marieke de Vries, Marije Hogeveen, Martine C de Vries, E J T Joanne Verweij, Rosa Geurtzen
{"title":"Voices of experience: what Dutch parents teach us about values and intuition in periviable decisions.","authors":"Angret de Boer, Lien De Proost, Marieke de Vries, Marije Hogeveen, Martine C de Vries, E J T Joanne Verweij, Rosa Geurtzen","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When extremely premature birth at the limits of viability is imminent, shared decision-making with parents regarding the infant's treatment is widely recommended. Aligning decisions with parental values can be challenging. So, this study aims to get insight into (1) what values parents considered important in their decision, (2) whether their decision was based on intuition and/or rational analysis and (3) parental suggestions on how to help explore and articulate values during prenatal counselling.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study was performed among Dutch parents who experienced (imminent) extremely premature birth. Diversity was aimed for through purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were coded and themes were derived from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen interviews were performed. Results show what parents considered important in their decision, such as the infants' future, family life and 'giving a chance'. Most parents made their decision more intuitively rather than rationally, for others both coexisted. Particularly fathers and parents who opted for palliative comfort care experienced the decision as rational. Parents would have liked to explore values, but found it challenging. They suggested strategies and conditions to help explore and articulate their values during counselling, such as a multidisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various considerations and underlying values were found to be important. Parents recognise the influence of emotions and intuition in decision-making and struggle to articulate their values, emphasising the need for guidance. Healthcare providers should engage in open, personalised discussions to facilitate value exploration, enabling informed decisions aligned with parental values.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: When extremely premature birth at the limits of viability is imminent, shared decision-making with parents regarding the infant's treatment is widely recommended. Aligning decisions with parental values can be challenging. So, this study aims to get insight into (1) what values parents considered important in their decision, (2) whether their decision was based on intuition and/or rational analysis and (3) parental suggestions on how to help explore and articulate values during prenatal counselling.

Design: A qualitative study was performed among Dutch parents who experienced (imminent) extremely premature birth. Diversity was aimed for through purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were coded and themes were derived from the data.

Results: Nineteen interviews were performed. Results show what parents considered important in their decision, such as the infants' future, family life and 'giving a chance'. Most parents made their decision more intuitively rather than rationally, for others both coexisted. Particularly fathers and parents who opted for palliative comfort care experienced the decision as rational. Parents would have liked to explore values, but found it challenging. They suggested strategies and conditions to help explore and articulate their values during counselling, such as a multidisciplinary approach.

Conclusions: Various considerations and underlying values were found to be important. Parents recognise the influence of emotions and intuition in decision-making and struggle to articulate their values, emphasising the need for guidance. Healthcare providers should engage in open, personalised discussions to facilitate value exploration, enabling informed decisions aligned with parental values.

经验的声音:荷兰父母教给我们关于可持续决策中的价值观和直觉。
目的:当极度早产儿的存活率即将达到极限时,人们普遍建议与父母共同决定婴儿的治疗方案。让决策与父母的价值观保持一致可能具有挑战性。因此,本研究旨在深入了解:(1)父母认为哪些价值观对他们的决定很重要;(2)他们的决定是否基于直觉和/或理性分析;(3)父母对如何在产前咨询中帮助探索和阐明价值观的建议:设计:对经历过(即将发生)极早产的荷兰父母进行了一项定性研究。通过有目的的抽样,力求实现多样性。进行了半结构式访谈,直至达到饱和。对访谈记录进行编码,并从数据中得出主题:共进行了 19 次访谈。结果显示,父母认为婴儿的未来、家庭生活和 "给孩子一个机会 "对他们的决定很重要。大多数父母是凭直觉而非理性做出决定的,而另一些父母则是两者并存。尤其是父亲和选择姑息治疗的父母,他们的决定是理性的。父母们希望探索价值观,但发现这很有挑战性。他们提出了一些策略和条件,以帮助在咨询过程中探索和表达他们的价值观,例如采用多学科方法:结论:各种考虑因素和基本价值观都很重要。家长们认识到情感和直觉在决策中的影响,并努力表达自己的价值观,强调了指导的必要性。医疗服务提供者应参与开放、个性化的讨论,以促进价值探索,从而做出符合家长价值观的明智决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信