Patient-related factors drive high rates of reported antibiotic allergies: A qualitative study

Renee Berry , Susan Herrmann , Michaela Lucas
{"title":"Patient-related factors drive high rates of reported antibiotic allergies: A qualitative study","authors":"Renee Berry ,&nbsp;Susan Herrmann ,&nbsp;Michaela Lucas","doi":"10.1016/j.amolm.2024.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unnecessary antibiotic avoidance due to allergy fears has adverse cost and health implications however, the problem is difficult to resolve because patient and provider-related factors leading to avoidance are multifactorial. We use qualitative research methods to explore patient perspectives of antibiotic allergy and testing to reach the heart of the problem.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To reveal factors leading patients to report antibiotic allergy, and determine what education is required to prevent the cycle of erroneous allergy reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The 29 patients were a sample of convenience recruited from a tertiary public hospital in Western Australia between March 2020 until August 2020; 18 were inpatients and 11 outpatients, with a median age of 64.2 years, and 15 (55%) were female. Semi-structured interviews assessed patients’ understanding and knowledge of three topics: (1) antibiotic allergy, (2) antibiotic allergy testing, and (3) outcomes of testing. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis by two researchers, independently.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three main, overlapping themes emerged as influential across topics: (1) Severity of the Index Reaction, (2) Trust in family and health care providers, and (3) Health literacy. Patients were largely unaware of the benefits of confirmatory testing, and the detrimental health consequences of unnecessary avoidance. Patients displayed trust in health care providers’ expertise and assumed that medical records were accurate to prevent prescribing errors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings provide evidence for an effective patient education strategy and highlight failures among hospital and primary health providers to recognise the potential harm of unverified antibiotic allergy. Healthcare professionals are influential at multiple steps of a patient's healthcare journey and addressing unconfirmed antibiotic allergy should be taken at each opportunity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72320,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of molecular medicine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949688824000194/pdfft?md5=c33bf8df1da47841d8b9caeba3e8d635&pid=1-s2.0-S2949688824000194-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of molecular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949688824000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unnecessary antibiotic avoidance due to allergy fears has adverse cost and health implications however, the problem is difficult to resolve because patient and provider-related factors leading to avoidance are multifactorial. We use qualitative research methods to explore patient perspectives of antibiotic allergy and testing to reach the heart of the problem.

Objective

To reveal factors leading patients to report antibiotic allergy, and determine what education is required to prevent the cycle of erroneous allergy reporting.

Methods

The 29 patients were a sample of convenience recruited from a tertiary public hospital in Western Australia between March 2020 until August 2020; 18 were inpatients and 11 outpatients, with a median age of 64.2 years, and 15 (55%) were female. Semi-structured interviews assessed patients’ understanding and knowledge of three topics: (1) antibiotic allergy, (2) antibiotic allergy testing, and (3) outcomes of testing. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis by two researchers, independently.

Results

Three main, overlapping themes emerged as influential across topics: (1) Severity of the Index Reaction, (2) Trust in family and health care providers, and (3) Health literacy. Patients were largely unaware of the benefits of confirmatory testing, and the detrimental health consequences of unnecessary avoidance. Patients displayed trust in health care providers’ expertise and assumed that medical records were accurate to prevent prescribing errors.

Conclusions

The findings provide evidence for an effective patient education strategy and highlight failures among hospital and primary health providers to recognise the potential harm of unverified antibiotic allergy. Healthcare professionals are influential at multiple steps of a patient's healthcare journey and addressing unconfirmed antibiotic allergy should be taken at each opportunity.

与患者相关的因素导致抗生素过敏报告率居高不下:一项定性研究
背景由于担心过敏而不必要地避免使用抗生素会对成本和健康产生不利影响,但这一问题很难解决,因为导致避免使用抗生素的患者和提供者相关因素是多方面的。目标揭示导致患者报告抗生素过敏的因素,并确定需要开展哪些教育来防止错误过敏报告的循环。方法从 2020 年 3 月到 2020 年 8 月期间,从西澳大利亚州的一家三级公立医院方便地招募了 29 名患者作为样本;其中 18 名是住院患者,11 名是门诊患者,年龄中位数为 64.2 岁,15 名(55%)为女性。半结构式访谈评估了患者对三个主题的理解和认识:(1) 抗生素过敏;(2) 抗生素过敏测试;(3) 测试结果。访谈记录由两名研究人员独立进行主题分析。结果在各个主题中出现了三个主要的、相互重叠的影响主题:(1) 指数反应的严重程度,(2) 对家人和医疗服务提供者的信任,以及 (3) 健康知识。患者大多不了解确证检验的益处,也不知道不必要的回避会对健康造成不利影响。结论:研究结果为有效的患者教育策略提供了证据,并强调了医院和基层医疗机构未能认识到未经证实的抗生素过敏的潜在危害。医疗保健专业人员在患者医疗保健过程的多个步骤中都具有影响力,因此应抓住每个机会解决未经证实的抗生素过敏问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aspects of molecular medicine
Aspects of molecular medicine Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信