Operation STICK Improves Vascular Access Outcomes in a Specialty Team: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Steven Matthew Gibson, Jessica Sarlabous, Lauren Adair, Amit Bahl
{"title":"Operation STICK Improves Vascular Access Outcomes in a Specialty Team: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Steven Matthew Gibson, Jessica Sarlabous, Lauren Adair, Amit Bahl","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Education and training may improve outcomes within an experienced vascular access team.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a standardized peripheral intravenous catheter insertion educational program (Operation STICK) on vascular access outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study design was used. Adult inpatients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) requiring ultrasound-guided insertion by a vascular access specialty team were eligible. Data were collected before and 7 months after the educational training program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 subjects were included (24 pre- and 30 post-implementation). Significant improvements were found for mean peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time (3.62 to 14.97 days, P < .001), completion of therapy (58.3% to 96.7%, P = .001), and first-stick success rate (79.2% to 100%, P = .013). Catheter-to-vein ratio significantly decreased (P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized education/training in vascular access focusing on best practices yields favorable outcomes for DIVA patients within an established specialty team.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Education and training may improve outcomes within an experienced vascular access team.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a standardized peripheral intravenous catheter insertion educational program (Operation STICK) on vascular access outcomes.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study design was used. Adult inpatients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) requiring ultrasound-guided insertion by a vascular access specialty team were eligible. Data were collected before and 7 months after the educational training program.

Results: A total of 54 subjects were included (24 pre- and 30 post-implementation). Significant improvements were found for mean peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time (3.62 to 14.97 days, P < .001), completion of therapy (58.3% to 96.7%, P = .001), and first-stick success rate (79.2% to 100%, P = .013). Catheter-to-vein ratio significantly decreased (P = .007).

Conclusions: Standardized education/training in vascular access focusing on best practices yields favorable outcomes for DIVA patients within an established specialty team.

STICK 行动改善了专科团队的血管通路结果:准实验研究
背景:教育和培训可提高经验丰富的血管通路团队的治疗效果:目的:本研究旨在衡量标准化外周静脉导管插入教育计划(STICK 行动)对血管通路治疗效果的影响:方法:采用准实验研究设计。方法:采用准实验研究设计,研究对象为需要由血管通路专业团队在超声引导下插入导管、静脉通路困难(DIVA)的成人住院患者。在教育培训项目开始前和结束后 7 个月收集数据:结果:共纳入 54 名受试者(实施前 24 名,实施后 30 名)。外周静脉导管的平均停留时间有了显著改善(3.62 天到 14.97 天,P 结论:在实施前和实施后,外周静脉导管的平均停留时间均有显著改善:以最佳实践为重点的血管通路标准化教育/培训可为已建立的专科团队中的 DIVA 患者带来良好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信