The power of social media: broader Twitter outreach and higher Altmetric scores significantly amplify neurosurgical citation reach.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-08-16 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.4.JNS232119
Ammad A Baig, Peter G Gerace, Wasiq I Khawar, Christopher S Graffeo, Jaims Lim, Kunal Vakharia, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Renée M Reynolds, Elad I Levy
{"title":"The power of social media: broader Twitter outreach and higher Altmetric scores significantly amplify neurosurgical citation reach.","authors":"Ammad A Baig, Peter G Gerace, Wasiq I Khawar, Christopher S Graffeo, Jaims Lim, Kunal Vakharia, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Renée M Reynolds, Elad I Levy","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.JNS232119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to quantify the role of social media-related academic activity through use of the Altmetric score (a composite score based on social media attention from a variety of sources) and investigate its potential impact on the number of citations received at 3 years postpublication (articles published between January 2019 and December 2019).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published in the top 12 neurosurgical journals according to Google Scholar (based on 5-year Web of Science impact factors, 2017-2021) were identified. Data collected included days since publication, Altmetric scores, and total number of tweets (posts), and 3-year citations were obtained from Google Scholar. A multiple linear regression model was created that featured a blocking method to stratify confounding variables from most to least contributing. Furthermore, the data were dichotomized by publications with ≥ 10 citations (top 25th percentile) and those with < 10 to analyze the impact of the score on total number of citations received at 3 years, using an independent-samples Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6721 included articles, the mean Altmetric score was 3.76 ± 15.69 and the mean number of citations received was 9.61 ± 22.16. When accounting for relevant control variables, the Altmetric score was a significant predictor of the total number of citations accumulated at 3 years (variability of 10.17%). On statistical testing, the Altmetric score was significantly higher in publications with ≥ 10 citations (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors report a strong, statistically significant correlation between the Altmetric score and the number of citations received. To their knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of social media academic activity on neurosurgery article citation dissemination, potentially influencing resident medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"257-263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.JNS232119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to quantify the role of social media-related academic activity through use of the Altmetric score (a composite score based on social media attention from a variety of sources) and investigate its potential impact on the number of citations received at 3 years postpublication (articles published between January 2019 and December 2019).

Methods: Articles published in the top 12 neurosurgical journals according to Google Scholar (based on 5-year Web of Science impact factors, 2017-2021) were identified. Data collected included days since publication, Altmetric scores, and total number of tweets (posts), and 3-year citations were obtained from Google Scholar. A multiple linear regression model was created that featured a blocking method to stratify confounding variables from most to least contributing. Furthermore, the data were dichotomized by publications with ≥ 10 citations (top 25th percentile) and those with < 10 to analyze the impact of the score on total number of citations received at 3 years, using an independent-samples Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: Among 6721 included articles, the mean Altmetric score was 3.76 ± 15.69 and the mean number of citations received was 9.61 ± 22.16. When accounting for relevant control variables, the Altmetric score was a significant predictor of the total number of citations accumulated at 3 years (variability of 10.17%). On statistical testing, the Altmetric score was significantly higher in publications with ≥ 10 citations (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The authors report a strong, statistically significant correlation between the Altmetric score and the number of citations received. To their knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of social media academic activity on neurosurgery article citation dissemination, potentially influencing resident medical education.

社交媒体的力量:更广泛的 Twitter 推广和更高的 Altmetric 分数显著扩大了神经外科引文的覆盖面。
研究目的作者试图通过使用 Altmetric 评分(基于各种来源的社交媒体关注度的综合评分)来量化社交媒体相关学术活动的作用,并调查其对发表后 3 年(2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月间发表的文章)所获引用次数的潜在影响:确定了谷歌学术排名前 12 位的神经外科期刊上发表的文章(基于 5 年的 Web of Science 影响因子,2017-2021 年)。收集的数据包括自发表以来的天数、Altmetric评分和推文(帖子)总数,并从谷歌学术中获取3年的引用情况。建立的多元线性回归模型采用了阻断法,将混杂变量从贡献最大到贡献最小进行分层。此外,采用独立样本曼-惠特尼U检验法,将数据按引用次数≥10次(前25百分位数)和<10次的出版物进行二分,以分析得分对3年总引用次数的影响:在收录的 6721 篇文章中,平均 Altmetric 得分为 3.76 ± 15.69,平均引用次数为 9.61 ± 22.16。在考虑相关控制变量的情况下,Altmetric得分对3年后的总被引次数有显著的预测作用(变异率为10.17%)。经统计检验,引用次数≥10次的出版物的Altmetric得分明显更高(p < 0.001):作者报告称,Altmetric 分数与论文被引用次数之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。据他们所知,这是第一项证明社交媒体学术活动对神经外科文章引用传播影响的研究,可能会对住院医师教育产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信