Longitudinal Follow-up of Medicare Patients After Esophageal Cancer Resection in the STS Database.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.034
Justin D Blasberg, Elliot Servais, Dylan Thibault, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Benjamin Kozower, Elizabeth David, James Donahue, Andrew Vekstein, Lillian Kang, Matthew Hartwig, Leigh Ann Jones, Andrzej Kosinski, Robert Habib, Christopher Towe, Christopher W Seder
{"title":"Longitudinal Follow-up of Medicare Patients After Esophageal Cancer Resection in the STS Database.","authors":"Justin D Blasberg, Elliot Servais, Dylan Thibault, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Benjamin Kozower, Elizabeth David, James Donahue, Andrew Vekstein, Lillian Kang, Matthew Hartwig, Leigh Ann Jones, Andrzej Kosinski, Robert Habib, Christopher Towe, Christopher W Seder","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding characteristics associated with survival after esophagectomy for cancer is critical to preoperative risk stratification. This study sought to define predictors for long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in Medicare patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was queried for patients aged ≥65 years who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2020 and linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data using a deterministic matching algorithm. Patient, hospital, and treatment variables were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate characteristics associated with long-term mortality and readmission. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence curves were generated and differences evaluated using the log-rank test and Gray's test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After CMS linkage, 4798 patients were included. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality in the study group was 3.84% and 7.45%, respectively. In the multivariable model, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, body mass index >35, and diabetes were associated with increased mortality <90 days post-surgery, while pN/pT upstaging was associated with increased mortality >90 days post-surgery. Patients upstaged to pN(+) had a 147% increased mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.47; 95% CI, 2.02-3.02) and those that remained pN(+) a 75% increased mortality risk (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.95) compared with downstaged patients. Patients who were pT upstaged had a 109% (aHR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73-2.53) increased mortality risk compared with pT downstaged patients. Risk for readmission was independent of procedure type or approach and was higher in c stage ≥2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥4, and pN+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicare patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer have identifiable patient-specific predictors for short-term mortality and tumor-specific predictors for long-term mortality and readmission. In the absence of pathologic T and N downstaging, risk for long-term mortality and readmission are increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding characteristics associated with survival after esophagectomy for cancer is critical to preoperative risk stratification. This study sought to define predictors for long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in Medicare patients.

Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was queried for patients aged ≥65 years who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2020 and linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data using a deterministic matching algorithm. Patient, hospital, and treatment variables were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate characteristics associated with long-term mortality and readmission. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence curves were generated and differences evaluated using the log-rank test and Gray's test, respectively.

Results: After CMS linkage, 4798 patients were included. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality in the study group was 3.84% and 7.45%, respectively. In the multivariable model, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, body mass index >35, and diabetes were associated with increased mortality <90 days post-surgery, while pN/pT upstaging was associated with increased mortality >90 days post-surgery. Patients upstaged to pN(+) had a 147% increased mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.47; 95% CI, 2.02-3.02) and those that remained pN(+) a 75% increased mortality risk (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.95) compared with downstaged patients. Patients who were pT upstaged had a 109% (aHR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73-2.53) increased mortality risk compared with pT downstaged patients. Risk for readmission was independent of procedure type or approach and was higher in c stage ≥2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥4, and pN+.

Conclusions: Medicare patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer have identifiable patient-specific predictors for short-term mortality and tumor-specific predictors for long-term mortality and readmission. In the absence of pathologic T and N downstaging, risk for long-term mortality and readmission are increased.

STS 数据库中食管癌切除术后医保患者的纵向随访。
背景:了解与癌症食管切除术后生存相关的特征对于术前风险分层至关重要。本研究旨在确定医保患者食管癌切除术后长期生存的预测因素:采用确定性匹配算法查询了 STS GTSD 中 2012-2020 年间年龄大于 65 岁、因癌症接受食管切除术的患者数据,并将其与 CMS 数据相链接。使用多变量 Cox 比例危险模型评估了患者、医院和治疗变量,以评估与长期死亡率和再入院率相关的特征。生成卡普兰-梅耶曲线和累积发病率曲线,并分别使用对数秩检验和格雷氏检验评估差异:结果:经过 CMS 连接,共纳入 4798 名患者。研究组的 30 天和 90 天死亡率分别为 3.84% 和 7.45%。在多变量模型中,ASA>3、BMI>35 和糖尿病与术后 90 天死亡率增加有关。与低分期患者相比,上分期为pN(+)的患者死亡风险增加147%(aHR 2.47;95%CI2.02-3.02),仍为pN(+)的患者死亡风险增加75%(aHR 1.75;95%CI1.57-1.95)。与 pT 下分期患者相比,pT 上分期患者的死亡风险增加了 109% (aHR 2.09;95%CI1.73-2.53)。再入院风险与手术类型或方法无关,c分期>2、ASA>4和pN+的患者再入院风险更高:结论:因癌症接受食管切除术的医保患者有可识别的患者特异性短期死亡率预测因子和肿瘤特异性长期死亡率和再入院预测因子。如果没有病理 T 和 N 降期,长期死亡率和再入院的风险会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信