The role of parents’ ability mindsets in parent–child interactions during math and reading activities

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Gillian E. Grose , Katherine Muenks , Sarah H. Eason , David B. Miele , Meredith L. Rowe , Geetha B. Ramani
{"title":"The role of parents’ ability mindsets in parent–child interactions during math and reading activities","authors":"Gillian E. Grose ,&nbsp;Katherine Muenks ,&nbsp;Sarah H. Eason ,&nbsp;David B. Miele ,&nbsp;Meredith L. Rowe ,&nbsp;Geetha B. Ramani","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parents can be instrumental in promoting young children’s early mathematics and literacy skills. However, differences in parents’ beliefs can influence their behavior during parent–child interactions. We examined how parental beliefs about the fixedness of children’s math and reading abilities shape their interactions with their 4- and 5-year-old children during an educational activity. Parental beliefs about children’s abilities were manipulated using “articles” indicating that academic ability is fixed in one domain (e.g., math) but malleable in another (e.g., reading). We then investigated differences in parental unconstructive (performance-oriented and controlling) and constructive (mastery-oriented and autonomy-supportive) involvement across conditions. We also examined whether parent behavior differed depending on the type of educational material parents were told the activity tapped into. The results showed that parents who were induced to have a fixed mindset about reading took full control of the reading activity more often than those who were induced to have a growth mindset about reading, but not math. Parents did not differ in constructive involvement between mindset induction conditions in either domain. We also found that parent autonomy behavior in math differed depending on parents’ general theory of intelligence beliefs. Overall, we found some evidence that parents’ beliefs about the malleability of their children’s ability in a specific domain affected their behaviors in that domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parents can be instrumental in promoting young children’s early mathematics and literacy skills. However, differences in parents’ beliefs can influence their behavior during parent–child interactions. We examined how parental beliefs about the fixedness of children’s math and reading abilities shape their interactions with their 4- and 5-year-old children during an educational activity. Parental beliefs about children’s abilities were manipulated using “articles” indicating that academic ability is fixed in one domain (e.g., math) but malleable in another (e.g., reading). We then investigated differences in parental unconstructive (performance-oriented and controlling) and constructive (mastery-oriented and autonomy-supportive) involvement across conditions. We also examined whether parent behavior differed depending on the type of educational material parents were told the activity tapped into. The results showed that parents who were induced to have a fixed mindset about reading took full control of the reading activity more often than those who were induced to have a growth mindset about reading, but not math. Parents did not differ in constructive involvement between mindset induction conditions in either domain. We also found that parent autonomy behavior in math differed depending on parents’ general theory of intelligence beliefs. Overall, we found some evidence that parents’ beliefs about the malleability of their children’s ability in a specific domain affected their behaviors in that domain.

在数学和阅读活动中,父母的能力心态在亲子互动中的作用。
父母在促进幼儿早期数学和读写能力方面可以发挥重要作用。然而,父母信念的差异会影响他们在亲子互动中的行为。我们研究了家长对儿童数学和阅读能力固定性的信念如何影响他们在教育活动中与 4-5 岁儿童的互动。我们用 "文章 "来操纵家长对儿童能力的信念,"文章 "表明学习能力在一个领域(如数学)是固定的,而在另一个领域(如阅读)则是可塑的。然后,我们研究了不同条件下家长非建设性(以成绩为导向和控制)和建设性(以掌握为导向和自主支持)参与的差异。我们还研究了家长的行为是否因家长被告知活动所涉及的教材类型而有所不同。结果表明,与那些被诱导对阅读抱有成长心态的家长相比,那些被诱导对阅读抱有固定心态的家长更经常地完全控制阅读活动,而那些被诱导对数学抱有成长心态的家长则不然。在这两个领域,不同思维模式诱导条件下的家长在建设性参与方面没有差异。我们还发现,家长在数学方面的自主行为因家长的一般智力理论信念而异。总之,我们发现一些证据表明,家长对孩子在特定领域能力的可塑性的信念会影响他们在该领域的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信