Measurement of transcranial Doppler insonation angles from three-dimensional reconstructions of CT angiography scans.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Daniel F Leotta, Mark Anderson, Angela Straccia, R Eugene Zierler, Alberto Aliseda, Florence H Sheehan, Deepak Sharma
{"title":"Measurement of transcranial Doppler insonation angles from three-dimensional reconstructions of CT angiography scans.","authors":"Daniel F Leotta, Mark Anderson, Angela Straccia, R Eugene Zierler, Alberto Aliseda, Florence H Sheehan, Deepak Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01187-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood velocities measured by Transcranial Doppler (TCD) are dependent on the angle between the incident ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow (known as the Doppler angle). However, when TCD examinations are performed without imaging the Doppler angle for each vessel segment is not known. We have measured Doppler angles in the basal cerebral arteries examined with TCD using three-dimensional (3D) vessel models generated from computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans. This approach produces angle statistics that are not accessible during non-imaging TCD studies. We created 3D models of the basal cerebral arteries for 24 vasospasm patients. Standard acoustic windows were mapped to the specific anatomy of each patient. Virtual ultrasound transmit beams were generated that originated from the acoustic window and intersected the centerline of each arterial segment. Doppler angle measurements were calculated and compiled for each vessel segment. Doppler angles were smallest for the middle cerebral artery M1 segment (median 24.6°) and ophthalmic artery (median 25.0°), and largest for the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment (median 76.4°) and posterior cerebral artery P2 segment (median 75.8°). The ophthalmic artery had the highest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (99%) while the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment had the lowest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (10%). These angle measurements indicate the expected deviation between measured and true velocities in the cerebral arteries, highlighting specific segments that may be prone to underestimation of velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01187-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood velocities measured by Transcranial Doppler (TCD) are dependent on the angle between the incident ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow (known as the Doppler angle). However, when TCD examinations are performed without imaging the Doppler angle for each vessel segment is not known. We have measured Doppler angles in the basal cerebral arteries examined with TCD using three-dimensional (3D) vessel models generated from computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans. This approach produces angle statistics that are not accessible during non-imaging TCD studies. We created 3D models of the basal cerebral arteries for 24 vasospasm patients. Standard acoustic windows were mapped to the specific anatomy of each patient. Virtual ultrasound transmit beams were generated that originated from the acoustic window and intersected the centerline of each arterial segment. Doppler angle measurements were calculated and compiled for each vessel segment. Doppler angles were smallest for the middle cerebral artery M1 segment (median 24.6°) and ophthalmic artery (median 25.0°), and largest for the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment (median 76.4°) and posterior cerebral artery P2 segment (median 75.8°). The ophthalmic artery had the highest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (99%) while the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment had the lowest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (10%). These angle measurements indicate the expected deviation between measured and true velocities in the cerebral arteries, highlighting specific segments that may be prone to underestimation of velocity.

Abstract Image

从 CT 血管造影扫描的三维重建中测量经颅多普勒感应角。
经颅多普勒(TCD)测量的血流速度取决于入射超声束与血流方向之间的角度(称为多普勒角)。然而,在不进行成像的情况下进行 TCD 检查时,每个血管段的多普勒角度都是未知的。我们使用计算机断层扫描(CTA)扫描生成的三维(3D)血管模型测量了用 TCD 检查的大脑基底动脉的多普勒角度。这种方法产生的角度统计数据是非成像 TCD 研究无法获得的。我们为 24 名血管痉挛患者创建了大脑基底动脉三维模型。根据每位患者的具体解剖结构映射了标准声窗。生成的虚拟超声波发射束从声窗出发,与每个动脉段的中心线相交。计算并汇总每个血管段的多普勒角度测量值。多普勒角度最小的是大脑中动脉 M1 段(中位数为 24.6°)和眼动脉(中位数为 25.0°),最大的是大脑前动脉 A2 段(中位数为 76.4°)和大脑后动脉 P2 段(中位数为 75.8°)。眼动脉多普勒角度小于 60° 的比例最高(99%),而大脑前动脉 A2 段多普勒角度小于 60° 的比例最低(10%)。这些角度测量结果表明了大脑动脉测量速度与真实速度之间的预期偏差,突出显示了可能容易低估速度的特定节段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信