Adverse events and perceived abandonment: learning from patients' accounts of medical mishaps.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mark Schlesinger, Isha Dhingra, Barbara A Fain, Julia C Prentice, Vinita Parkash
{"title":"Adverse events and perceived abandonment: learning from patients' accounts of medical mishaps.","authors":"Mark Schlesinger, Isha Dhingra, Barbara A Fain, Julia C Prentice, Vinita Parkash","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse medical events affect 10% of American households annually, inducing a variety of harms and attitudinal changes. The impact of adverse events on perceived abandonment by patients and their care partners has not been methodically assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify ways in which providers, patients and families responded to medical mishaps, linking these qualitatively and statistically to reported feelings of abandonment and sequelae induced by perceived abandonment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods analysis of responses to the Massachusetts Medical Errors Recontact survey with participants reporting a medical error within the past 5 years. The survey consisted of forty closed and open-ended questions examining adverse medical events and their consequences. Respondents were asked whether they felt 'that the doctors abandoned or betrayed you or your family'. Open-ended responses were analysed with a coding schema by two clinician coders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 253 respondents, 34.5% initially and 20% persistently experienced abandonment. Perceived abandonment could be traced to interactions before (18%), during (34%) and after (45%) the medical mishap. Comprehensive post-incident communication reduced abandonment for patients staying with the provider associated with the mishap. However, 68.4% of patients perceiving abandonment left their original provider; for them, post-error communication did not increase the probability of resolution. Abandonment accounted for half the post-event loss of trust in clinicians.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Survey-based data may under-report the impact of perceived errors on vulnerable populations. Moreover, patients may not be cognizant of all forms of adverse events or all sequelae to those events. Our data were drawn from a single state and time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing the deleterious impact of persisting abandonment merits attention in programmes responding to patient safety concerns. Enhancing patient engagement in the aftermath of an adverse medical event has the potential to reinforce therapeutic alliances between patients and their subsequent clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse medical events affect 10% of American households annually, inducing a variety of harms and attitudinal changes. The impact of adverse events on perceived abandonment by patients and their care partners has not been methodically assessed.

Objective: To identify ways in which providers, patients and families responded to medical mishaps, linking these qualitatively and statistically to reported feelings of abandonment and sequelae induced by perceived abandonment.

Methods: Mixed-methods analysis of responses to the Massachusetts Medical Errors Recontact survey with participants reporting a medical error within the past 5 years. The survey consisted of forty closed and open-ended questions examining adverse medical events and their consequences. Respondents were asked whether they felt 'that the doctors abandoned or betrayed you or your family'. Open-ended responses were analysed with a coding schema by two clinician coders.

Results: Of the 253 respondents, 34.5% initially and 20% persistently experienced abandonment. Perceived abandonment could be traced to interactions before (18%), during (34%) and after (45%) the medical mishap. Comprehensive post-incident communication reduced abandonment for patients staying with the provider associated with the mishap. However, 68.4% of patients perceiving abandonment left their original provider; for them, post-error communication did not increase the probability of resolution. Abandonment accounted for half the post-event loss of trust in clinicians.

Limitations: Survey-based data may under-report the impact of perceived errors on vulnerable populations. Moreover, patients may not be cognizant of all forms of adverse events or all sequelae to those events. Our data were drawn from a single state and time period.

Conclusion: Addressing the deleterious impact of persisting abandonment merits attention in programmes responding to patient safety concerns. Enhancing patient engagement in the aftermath of an adverse medical event has the potential to reinforce therapeutic alliances between patients and their subsequent clinicians.

不良事件与被遗弃感:从患者对医疗事故的描述中学习。
背景:每年有 10% 的美国家庭受到不良医疗事件的影响,这些事件会造成各种伤害和态度上的改变。目前还没有方法评估不良事件对患者及其护理伙伴所认为的放弃的影响:目的:确定医疗服务提供者、患者和家属对医疗事故的反应方式,并将这些反应方式与报告的被遗弃感和由被遗弃感引起的后遗症进行定性和统计分析:对马萨诸塞州医疗事故再接触调查(Massachusetts Medical Errors Recontact survey)中报告过去 5 年内发生过医疗事故的参与者的回复进行混合方法分析。调查包括 40 个封闭式和开放式问题,涉及不良医疗事件及其后果。受访者被问及是否觉得 "医生抛弃或背叛了你或你的家人"。两位临床编码员使用编码模式对开放式回答进行了分析:结果:在 253 位受访者中,34.5% 的受访者最初和 20% 的受访者持续感受到被抛弃。医疗事故发生前(18%)、医疗事故发生中(34%)和医疗事故发生后(45%)的互动可追溯到被遗弃的感受。事故发生后的全面沟通减少了与医疗事故相关的医疗服务提供者保持联系的患者的放弃感。然而,68.4%认为被放弃的患者离开了原来的医疗服务提供者;对他们来说,事故后的沟通并没有增加解决问题的可能性。在事件发生后失去对临床医生信任的患者中,有一半是被抛弃的:局限性:基于调查的数据可能会低估感知错误对弱势群体的影响。此外,患者可能并不了解所有形式的不良事件或这些事件的所有后遗症。我们的数据来自单一州和单一时间段:在应对患者安全问题的计划中,解决持续遗弃的有害影响值得关注。在不良医疗事件发生后,加强患者的参与有可能加强患者与后续临床医生之间的治疗联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信