Predicting the Timing and Cause of Microvascular Free Flap Failure: An Australian Study of 1569 Free Flaps.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yash Gupta, Elias Moisidis, Fred Clarke, Roger Haddad, Vlad Illie, James Southwell-Keely
{"title":"Predicting the Timing and Cause of Microvascular Free Flap Failure: An Australian Study of 1569 Free Flaps.","authors":"Yash Gupta, Elias Moisidis, Fred Clarke, Roger Haddad, Vlad Illie, James Southwell-Keely","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to assess the possible predictors of microvascular free flap failure and determine the critical postoperative timing of flap failure, thereby minimizing this adverse outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single-institutional review of 1569 free flap operations. All free flaps with outcome status recorded were analyzed for possible predictors in the development of microvascular compromise. Compromised cases were then analyzed for differences in time to compromise and time to theater takeback between salvaged versus failed free flaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the assessable 1569 free flaps, 31 developed microvascular compromise (2.0%); the salvage rate was 20.0%, and overall failure rate was 1.5%. Osteocutaneous free flaps in head and neck had increased risk of developing free flap failure compared to other flaps (odds ratio = 3.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-12.7). Among breast patients, previous radiotherapy had a significant association with flap failure (P < 0.001). Free flap salvage rates dropped from 38.5% to 7.7% for compromises detected after 24 hours (P = 0.160), and from 57.1% to 11.1% for free flaps taken back to theater greater than 3 hours after compromise detection (P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delays in compromise detection and flap takeback to theater resulted in reduced salvage rates, with the critical timing of takeback being under 3 hours. Standardized flap monitoring protocols and incorporation of newer technologies could see faster detection and improved salvage rates. Additional care is required when reconstructing: osteocutaneous head and neck free flaps and previously irradiated breast patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to assess the possible predictors of microvascular free flap failure and determine the critical postoperative timing of flap failure, thereby minimizing this adverse outcome.

Methods: This is a retrospective single-institutional review of 1569 free flap operations. All free flaps with outcome status recorded were analyzed for possible predictors in the development of microvascular compromise. Compromised cases were then analyzed for differences in time to compromise and time to theater takeback between salvaged versus failed free flaps.

Results: Of the assessable 1569 free flaps, 31 developed microvascular compromise (2.0%); the salvage rate was 20.0%, and overall failure rate was 1.5%. Osteocutaneous free flaps in head and neck had increased risk of developing free flap failure compared to other flaps (odds ratio = 3.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-12.7). Among breast patients, previous radiotherapy had a significant association with flap failure (P < 0.001). Free flap salvage rates dropped from 38.5% to 7.7% for compromises detected after 24 hours (P = 0.160), and from 57.1% to 11.1% for free flaps taken back to theater greater than 3 hours after compromise detection (P = 0.032).

Conclusions: Delays in compromise detection and flap takeback to theater resulted in reduced salvage rates, with the critical timing of takeback being under 3 hours. Standardized flap monitoring protocols and incorporation of newer technologies could see faster detection and improved salvage rates. Additional care is required when reconstructing: osteocutaneous head and neck free flaps and previously irradiated breast patients.

预测微血管游离皮瓣失败的时间和原因:澳大利亚对1569个游离皮瓣的研究。
背景:该研究旨在评估微血管游离皮瓣失败的可能预测因素,并确定术后皮瓣失败的关键时机,从而将这一不良后果降至最低:本研究旨在评估微血管游离皮瓣失败的可能预测因素,并确定皮瓣失败的术后关键时机,从而最大限度地减少这一不良后果:这是一项对 1569 例游离皮瓣手术进行的单机构回顾性研究。对所有有结果记录的游离皮瓣进行了分析,以找出微血管受损的可能预测因素。然后,对受损病例进行分析,以确定挽救的游离皮瓣与失败的游离皮瓣在受损时间和术后恢复时间上的差异:结果:在可评估的 1569 个游离皮瓣中,31 个出现微血管损伤(2.0%);挽救率为 20.0%,总体失败率为 1.5%。与其他皮瓣相比,头颈部的骨皮游离皮瓣发生游离皮瓣失败的风险更高(几率比=3.8,95%置信区间:1.2-12.7)。在乳腺患者中,既往接受过放疗与皮瓣失败有显著关联(P < 0.001)。在24小时后发现皮瓣受损的患者中,游离皮瓣的挽救率从38.5%降至7.7%(P = 0.160),在发现皮瓣受损超过3小时后将游离皮瓣带回手术室的患者中,游离皮瓣的挽救率从57.1%降至11.1%(P = 0.032):结论:皮瓣受损检测和皮瓣送回手术室的延迟会降低抢救率,而送回的关键时间应在3小时以内。标准化的皮瓣监测方案和新技术的应用可以加快检测速度,提高抢救率。在重建骨皮头颈部游离皮瓣和曾接受过放射治疗的乳房患者时需要格外小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信