Exact treatment of volume constraint for RDE-based topology optimization of elastoplastic structures

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Exact treatment of volume constraint for RDE-based topology optimization of elastoplastic structures","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the reaction–diffusion equation (RDE) based topology optimization of elastoplastic structure, exactness in volume constraint can be crucial. As a non-traditional numerical method, the recently proposed exact volume constraint requires iterations to determine the precise Lagrangian multiplier. Conversely, conventional inexact volume constraint methods resemble a time-forward scheme, potentially leading to convergence issues. An approximate topological derivative for the 2D elastoplastic problem is derived and utilized to investigate the difference between employing exact and inexact volume constraint methods. A comprehensive examination is conducted by varying parameters such as mesh density, design domain aspect ratio, applied load, constrained volume ratio, and the diffusion coefficient <span><math><mi>τ</mi></math></span>. Results indicate that the inexactness of volume constraint can lead to more severe issues in elastoplasticity compared to elasticity. The exact volume constraint method not only yields significantly improved convergence in structural optimization but also reduces structural compliance and computational runtime. There might be speculation that the fluctuation caused by the traditional inexact treatment of volume constraints could prevent the optimization process from being trapped in a local minimum. However, contrary to this assumption, in elastoplastic cases, it often has the opposite effect, frequently driving the structure away from a global optimum. Particularly noteworthy is the observation that inexact volume constraint quite often results in very poor structures with exceedingly high compliance. On the other hand, increasing the normalization parameter can lead to substantial improvements in results. These findings underscore the necessity of exact volume constraint for nonlinear topology optimization problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51039,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095579972400362X/pdfft?md5=97fb0a818116331a606a1a7da64cb5bd&pid=1-s2.0-S095579972400362X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095579972400362X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the reaction–diffusion equation (RDE) based topology optimization of elastoplastic structure, exactness in volume constraint can be crucial. As a non-traditional numerical method, the recently proposed exact volume constraint requires iterations to determine the precise Lagrangian multiplier. Conversely, conventional inexact volume constraint methods resemble a time-forward scheme, potentially leading to convergence issues. An approximate topological derivative for the 2D elastoplastic problem is derived and utilized to investigate the difference between employing exact and inexact volume constraint methods. A comprehensive examination is conducted by varying parameters such as mesh density, design domain aspect ratio, applied load, constrained volume ratio, and the diffusion coefficient τ. Results indicate that the inexactness of volume constraint can lead to more severe issues in elastoplasticity compared to elasticity. The exact volume constraint method not only yields significantly improved convergence in structural optimization but also reduces structural compliance and computational runtime. There might be speculation that the fluctuation caused by the traditional inexact treatment of volume constraints could prevent the optimization process from being trapped in a local minimum. However, contrary to this assumption, in elastoplastic cases, it often has the opposite effect, frequently driving the structure away from a global optimum. Particularly noteworthy is the observation that inexact volume constraint quite often results in very poor structures with exceedingly high compliance. On the other hand, increasing the normalization parameter can lead to substantial improvements in results. These findings underscore the necessity of exact volume constraint for nonlinear topology optimization problems.

基于 RDE 的弹塑性结构拓扑优化的体积约束精确处理
对于基于反应扩散方程(RDE)的弹塑性结构拓扑优化而言,体积约束的精确性至关重要。作为一种非传统的数值方法,最近提出的精确体积约束需要迭代来确定精确的拉格朗日乘数。相反,传统的非精确体积约束方法类似于时间前馈方案,可能会导致收敛问题。本文导出了二维弹塑性问题的近似拓扑导数,并利用该导数研究了采用精确和非精确体积约束方法之间的差异。通过改变网格密度、设计域纵横比、外加载荷、约束体积比和扩散系数 τ 等参数进行了全面研究。 结果表明,与弹性问题相比,不精确的体积约束在弹塑性问题中会导致更严重的问题。精确体积约束法不仅能显著提高结构优化的收敛性,还能减少结构顺应性和计算运行时间。可能有人会猜测,传统的非精确体积约束处理方法所引起的波动可以防止优化过程陷入局部最小值。然而,与这一假设相反的是,在弹塑性情况下,它往往会产生相反的效果,经常会使结构偏离全局最优。尤其值得注意的是,不精确的体积约束往往会导致结构非常糟糕,顺应性极高。另一方面,增加归一化参数可以显著改善结果。这些发现强调了精确体积约束对非线性拓扑优化问题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
368
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: This journal is specifically dedicated to the dissemination of the latest developments of new engineering analysis techniques using boundary elements and other mesh reduction methods. Boundary element (BEM) and mesh reduction methods (MRM) are very active areas of research with the techniques being applied to solve increasingly complex problems. The journal stresses the importance of these applications as well as their computational aspects, reliability and robustness. The main criteria for publication will be the originality of the work being reported, its potential usefulness and applications of the methods to new fields. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes a series of special issues dealing with specific areas of current research. The journal has, for many years, provided a channel of communication between academics and industrial researchers working in mesh reduction methods Fields Covered: • Boundary Element Methods (BEM) • Mesh Reduction Methods (MRM) • Meshless Methods • Integral Equations • Applications of BEM/MRM in Engineering • Numerical Methods related to BEM/MRM • Computational Techniques • Combination of Different Methods • Advanced Formulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信