Two years in a post-Dobbs world: clinical, social and professional consequences.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975

Isabel Beshar, Megan Corn, Paul D Blumenthal

{"title":"Two years in a post-Dobbs world: clinical, social and professional consequences.","authors":"Isabel Beshar, Megan Corn, Paul D Blumenthal","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of review: Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization revoked the decades-old precedent that pregnancy termination is a constitutional right. This review article explores the research landscape describing the consequences of overturning Roe v Wade for patients and providers.Recent findings: To date, fourteen states have enforced total bans on abortion, with seven more restricting abortion access to levels not seen since before Roe. Dobbs has had immediate and swift consequences from clinical, social and professional perspectives, with increases in maternal mortality and demand for long-acting and permanent contraception, matched by declines in both access to methotrexate and applications to Obstetrics & Gynecology training programs.Summary: Eighteen million patients now live in states where abortion access is highly if not completely inaccessible. Abortion restrictions have profound implications beyond those desiring pregnancy termination; future research should continue to explore the ways Dobbs has affected clinical care, public health and social practices.","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization revoked the decades-old precedent that pregnancy termination is a constitutional right. This review article explores the research landscape describing the consequences of overturning Roe v Wade for patients and providers.

Recent findings: To date, fourteen states have enforced total bans on abortion, with seven more restricting abortion access to levels not seen since before Roe. Dobbs has had immediate and swift consequences from clinical, social and professional perspectives, with increases in maternal mortality and demand for long-acting and permanent contraception, matched by declines in both access to methotrexate and applications to Obstetrics & Gynecology training programs.

Summary: Eighteen million patients now live in states where abortion access is highly if not completely inaccessible. Abortion restrictions have profound implications beyond those desiring pregnancy termination; future research should continue to explore the ways Dobbs has affected clinical care, public health and social practices.

查看原文本刊更多论文

后多布斯世界的两年：临床、社会和专业后果。

审查目的：多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案废除了终止妊娠是一项宪法权利这一已有几十年历史的先例。这篇评论文章探讨了推翻 "罗伊诉韦德 "案对患者和医疗服务提供者造成的后果的研究情况：迄今为止，已有 14 个州全面禁止堕胎，另有 7 个州将堕胎限制到了自罗伊案之前从未有过的水平。从临床、社会和专业角度来看，多布斯已经产生了直接而迅速的后果，孕产妇死亡率以及对长效和永久性避孕药具的需求都有所增加，与此同时，甲氨蝶呤的使用和妇产科培训计划的申请人数都有所下降。堕胎限制的深远影响超出了那些希望终止妊娠的人；未来的研究应继续探索多布斯如何影响临床护理、公共卫生和社会实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

104

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.