Association between lymphatic abnormalities in the neck and thorax in primary chylopericardium and surgical outcomes evaluated by non-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-144
Yimeng Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Mengke Liu, Xingpeng Li, Mingxia Zhang, Yongli Duan, Rengui Wang
{"title":"Association between lymphatic abnormalities in the neck and thorax in primary chylopericardium and surgical outcomes evaluated by non-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography.","authors":"Yimeng Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Mengke Liu, Xingpeng Li, Mingxia Zhang, Yongli Duan, Rengui Wang","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chylopericardium refers to the accumulation of chylous fluid in the pericardial cavity. Non-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) can show neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities in the primary chylopericardium. It is not clear whether there is a relationship between neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities in primary chylopericardium and thoracic duct terminal release surgery. This study aimed to explore the correlation between the severity of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities observed in non-enhanced MRL and the surgical outcomes in primary chylopericardium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on fifty-six patients diagnosed with primary chylopericardium between January 2016 and December 2021, all of whom underwent thoracic duct terminal release surgery. Ultrasonography, chest computed tomography (CT) and non-enhanced MRL were performed prior to the surgical intervention. Patients were categorized into four types based on the severity of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities observed in the non-enhanced MRL. Clinical and laboratory examinations and surgical outcomes were compared across different types using <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>-test or Fisher's exact test, <i>t</i>-test, and Kruskal-Wallis H-test. Additionally, independent factors influencing surgical outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among primary chylopericardium cases (n=56), 22 (39.2%) were classified as type I or II, 17 (30.4%) as type III, and 17 (30.4%) as type IV. Surgical outcomes were more favorable for type I or II patients than those with type III or IV, accompanied by a reduction in postoperative primary chylopericardium volume (P=0.002). Postoperative chest CT scans indicated that type I or II patients had fewer instances of large grid shadows, small grid shadows, and bronchovascular bundle thickening compared to preoperative scans (P=0.001, P=0.02, P=0.03). Age and bronchomediastinal trunk dilation emerged as independent factors influencing surgical outcomes [odds ratio (OR) 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.220, P=0.001; OR 11.10, 95% CI: 1.70-72.39, P=0.01, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A more severe degree of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities is associated with worse surgical outcomes. Moreover, age and bronchomediastinal trunk dilatation are independent predictors of surgical outcomes. Preoperative utilization of non-enhanced MRL for severity of lymphatic abnormalities classification in primary chylopericardium patients offers a noninvasive means of assessing surgical risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chylopericardium refers to the accumulation of chylous fluid in the pericardial cavity. Non-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) can show neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities in the primary chylopericardium. It is not clear whether there is a relationship between neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities in primary chylopericardium and thoracic duct terminal release surgery. This study aimed to explore the correlation between the severity of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities observed in non-enhanced MRL and the surgical outcomes in primary chylopericardium.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on fifty-six patients diagnosed with primary chylopericardium between January 2016 and December 2021, all of whom underwent thoracic duct terminal release surgery. Ultrasonography, chest computed tomography (CT) and non-enhanced MRL were performed prior to the surgical intervention. Patients were categorized into four types based on the severity of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities observed in the non-enhanced MRL. Clinical and laboratory examinations and surgical outcomes were compared across different types using χ 2-test or Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Kruskal-Wallis H-test. Additionally, independent factors influencing surgical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Among primary chylopericardium cases (n=56), 22 (39.2%) were classified as type I or II, 17 (30.4%) as type III, and 17 (30.4%) as type IV. Surgical outcomes were more favorable for type I or II patients than those with type III or IV, accompanied by a reduction in postoperative primary chylopericardium volume (P=0.002). Postoperative chest CT scans indicated that type I or II patients had fewer instances of large grid shadows, small grid shadows, and bronchovascular bundle thickening compared to preoperative scans (P=0.001, P=0.02, P=0.03). Age and bronchomediastinal trunk dilation emerged as independent factors influencing surgical outcomes [odds ratio (OR) 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.220, P=0.001; OR 11.10, 95% CI: 1.70-72.39, P=0.01, respectively].

Conclusions: A more severe degree of neck and thoracic lymphatic abnormalities is associated with worse surgical outcomes. Moreover, age and bronchomediastinal trunk dilatation are independent predictors of surgical outcomes. Preoperative utilization of non-enhanced MRL for severity of lymphatic abnormalities classification in primary chylopericardium patients offers a noninvasive means of assessing surgical risk.

通过非增强磁共振(MR)淋巴管造影术评估原发性乳糜胸颈部和胸部淋巴异常与手术效果之间的关系。
背景:乳糜心包指的是心包腔内乳糜液的积聚。非增强磁共振淋巴管造影(MRL)可显示原发性乳糜心包炎的颈部和胸部淋巴异常。目前尚不清楚原发性乳糜胸的颈部和胸部淋巴异常与胸导管末端释放手术之间是否存在关系。本研究旨在探讨非增强型 MRL 观察到的颈部和胸部淋巴异常的严重程度与原发性乳糜胸手术结果之间的相关性:这是一项回顾性队列研究。对2016年1月至2021年12月期间诊断为原发性乳糜尿的56例患者进行了回顾性分析,所有患者均接受了胸导管末端释放手术。手术前进行了超声波检查、胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和非增强型 MRL 检查。根据非增强 MRL 观察到的颈部和胸部淋巴异常的严重程度,将患者分为四种类型。采用χ 2检验或费雪精确检验、t检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较不同类型患者的临床和实验室检查结果以及手术结果。此外,还分析了影响手术结果的独立因素:在原发性乳糜心包积液病例(n=56)中,22 例(39.2%)为 I 型或 II 型,17 例(30.4%)为 III 型,17 例(30.4%)为 IV 型。与 III 型或 IV 型患者相比,I 型或 II 型患者的手术效果更佳,术后原发性乳糜心包体积也有所减少(P=0.002)。术后胸部 CT 扫描显示,与术前扫描相比,I 型或 II 型患者出现大网格阴影、小网格阴影和支气管血管束增厚的情况较少(P=0.001、P=0.02、P=0.03)。年龄和支气管-纵隔干扩张是影响手术结果的独立因素[几率比(OR)分别为0.03,95%置信区间(CI):0.003-0.220,P=0.001;OR 11.10,95% CI:1.70-72.39,P=0.01]:颈部和胸部淋巴异常程度越严重,手术效果越差。此外,年龄和支气管-纵隔干扩张也是手术效果的独立预测因素。术前利用非增强型 MRL 对原发性乳糜胸患者的淋巴异常严重程度进行分类,为评估手术风险提供了一种无创手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信