Can cereal-based oral contrast agents-assisted ultrasound become an alternative to non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiological follow-up for pancreatic cystic lesions?

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are recommended to be examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), yet MRI still has limitations, such as high costs, the risk of triggering claustrophobia, and relatively low availability compared with ultrasound. Oral contrast agents-assisted ultrasound has been used to examine the gallbladder and stomach, but whether oral contrast agents could improve the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) for PCLs and could be a potential alternative to non-contrast MRI for PCL follow-up has not been studied. This study aimed to explore the value of cereal-based oral contrast agents in improving the accuracy of PCLs during TAUS.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Patients with PCL who were admitted to our center between January 2023 and January 2024 were enrolled, and TAUS was performed before and after taking cereal-based oral contrast agents. The imaging quality of the PCL was measured by structural visualization scores. The structural visualization scores of oral contrast agent-assisted ultrasound and non-contrast MRI were also compared.

Results: A total of 27 patients with PCLs were enrolled, and 30 PCLs were detected. The sonolucency of the PCL improved after oral contrast agent administration. Before taking the agent, only 30% of patients had satisfactory sonolucency; after taking the oral contrast agent, the corresponding proportion reached 80% (P=0.002). The structural visualization score of the PCL determined by oral contrast agent-assisted TAUS was higher than that determined without the aid of an agent [1 (0-6) vs. 1 (0-3), P=0.001], which was mainly reflected in the increase in the number of visible septa after taking the agent. No significant difference was detected between the structural visualization score of the PCL examined by oral contrast agent-assisted TAUS and that examined by non-contrast MRI and the correlation between the 2 types of scores were satisfactory [1 (0-6) vs. 2 (0-7), P=0.070, Spearman correlation factor r=0.880].

Conclusions: This study used a structured scoring system to confirm that cereal-based oral contrast agents could improve the ultrasound quality of PCLs, and the correlation between the quality of oral contrast agent-assisted ultrasound and non-contrast MRI findings on PCLs was satisfactory. Further research to improve visualization of PCLs on TAUS using oral contrast agents could result in TAUS being a potential alternative to MRI in the follow-up of PCLs in resource-limited situations.