Men's Experiences With Perinatal Loss: An Integrative Review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Rebecca Burrow
{"title":"Men's Experiences With Perinatal Loss: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Rebecca Burrow","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2023-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Perinatal loss is a tremendous loss for many and can have consequences that affect physical and mental health. This topic has been substantially examined among women; however, men's experiences with perinatal loss have lacked attention. Many men report significant grief, self-blame, stigma, loss of self-identity, lack of recognition of their loss, marginalization, and gendered expectations that negate their grieving process. This places men at risk for complicated or disenfranchised grief. Most studies examining perinatal loss have been conducted in countries outside of the United States and outside of the discipline of nursing. As nurses are concerned about holistic care of men and women, the findings resulting from studies with women and other cultural perspectives may not be generalizable to men in the United States. <b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the current state of science regarding men's experiences with perinatal loss, what is known about this loss within the nursing discipline, to identify gaps in nursing knowledge, and to expose areas for further research. <b>Method:</b> Online databases including CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were used to perform the initial search. The search terms included \"men,\" \"perinatal loss,\" \"miscarriage,\" \"stillbirth,\" and \"grief.\" <b>Results:</b> Themes were identified through a review of the literature that included that men experienced a loss of the role of fatherhood and identity. Additionally, men reported expectations about socially and gender-specific behavior that influenced their expressions of grief and their coping process. Finally, the lack of recognition of their loss as fathers in perinatal loss resulted in the marginalization and the use of avoidance and distraction to cope with the loss, as well as risks to the health of the partnered relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2023-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perinatal loss is a tremendous loss for many and can have consequences that affect physical and mental health. This topic has been substantially examined among women; however, men's experiences with perinatal loss have lacked attention. Many men report significant grief, self-blame, stigma, loss of self-identity, lack of recognition of their loss, marginalization, and gendered expectations that negate their grieving process. This places men at risk for complicated or disenfranchised grief. Most studies examining perinatal loss have been conducted in countries outside of the United States and outside of the discipline of nursing. As nurses are concerned about holistic care of men and women, the findings resulting from studies with women and other cultural perspectives may not be generalizable to men in the United States. Purpose: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine the current state of science regarding men's experiences with perinatal loss, what is known about this loss within the nursing discipline, to identify gaps in nursing knowledge, and to expose areas for further research. Method: Online databases including CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were used to perform the initial search. The search terms included "men," "perinatal loss," "miscarriage," "stillbirth," and "grief." Results: Themes were identified through a review of the literature that included that men experienced a loss of the role of fatherhood and identity. Additionally, men reported expectations about socially and gender-specific behavior that influenced their expressions of grief and their coping process. Finally, the lack of recognition of their loss as fathers in perinatal loss resulted in the marginalization and the use of avoidance and distraction to cope with the loss, as well as risks to the health of the partnered relationship.

男性围产期丧子的经历:综合评论》(Men's Experiences With Perinatal Loss: An Integrative Review.
引言围产期丧子对许多人来说都是巨大的损失,其后果可能会影响身心健康。这一话题已在女性中进行了大量研究,但男性的围产期丧子经历却缺乏关注。许多男性表示,他们经历了巨大的悲痛、自责、耻辱、自我认同的丧失、对自己的损失缺乏认识、边缘化以及否定其悲伤过程的性别期望。这使男性面临悲伤复杂化或被剥夺权利的风险。大多数有关围产期丧亲的研究都是在美国以外的国家和护理学科以外进行的。由于护士关注的是男性和女性的整体护理,因此针对女性和其他文化视角的研究结果可能无法推广到美国的男性身上。目的:本综合综述旨在研究有关男性围产期丧偶经历的科学现状、护理学科对这种丧偶经历的了解程度、找出护理知识中的差距并揭示有待进一步研究的领域。研究方法:使用在线数据库(包括 CINAHL、PubMed 和 Scopus)进行初步检索。检索词包括 "男性"、"围产期损失"、"流产"、"死产 "和 "悲伤"。结果通过对文献的回顾发现了一些主题,其中包括男性经历了父亲角色和身份的丧失。此外,男性对社会和性别行为的期望影响了他们对悲伤的表达和应对过程。最后,在围产期丧子事件中,他们作为父亲的损失没有得到承认,这导致了他们被边缘化,并使用逃避和分散注意力的方法来应对丧子事件,同时也给伴侣关系的健康带来了风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信