Development and Validation of a Mobile Phone Application for Measuring Knee Range of Motion.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Matthew F Gong, Logan E Finger, Christina Letter, Soheyla Amirian, Bambang Parmanto, Michael O'Malley, Brian A Klatt, Ahmad P Tafti, Johannes F Plate
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Mobile Phone Application for Measuring Knee Range of Motion.","authors":"Matthew F Gong, Logan E Finger, Christina Letter, Soheyla Amirian, Bambang Parmanto, Michael O'Malley, Brian A Klatt, Ahmad P Tafti, Johannes F Plate","doi":"10.1055/a-2388-0812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee range of motion (ROM) is an important indicator of knee function. Outside the clinical setting, patients may not be able to accurately assess knee ROM, which may impair recovery following trauma or surgery. This study aims to validate a smartphone mobile application developed to measure knee ROM compared to visual and goniometer ROM measurements. A knee ROM Android mobile application was developed to measure knee ROM. Patients ≥ 18 years old presenting to an orthopaedic clinic with native knee complaints were approached to participate. Knee ROM was measured bilaterally by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon using (1) vision, (2) goniometer, and (3) the mobile application. Measurements were compared in flexion and extension using a one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Eighty-four knee ROM measurements (40 left, 44 right) were obtained in 47 patients. Median Kellgren-Lawrence grade from available radiographs was grade 3. In flexion, mobile application (117.6 ± 14.7 degrees) measurements were not significantly different from visual (116.1 ± 13.6 degrees) or goniometer (116.2 ± 13.6 degrees) measurements. In extension, mobile application (4.8 ± 7.3 degrees) measurements were significantly different from visual (1.9 ± 4.1 degrees) measurements on post hoc analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while no differences were present compared to goniometer (3.1 ± 5.8 degrees) measurements. Our study found that a mobile application for evaluating knee ROM was noninferior to goniometer-based measurements performed by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon. Future studies will investigate this application's utility in (1) remote patient care, (2) accelerating recovery during rehabilitation, (3) detecting early postoperative complications including arthrofibrosis, and (4) adding additional functionalities to the application to provide more detail-oriented descriptive analyses of patient knee function.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2388-0812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee range of motion (ROM) is an important indicator of knee function. Outside the clinical setting, patients may not be able to accurately assess knee ROM, which may impair recovery following trauma or surgery. This study aims to validate a smartphone mobile application developed to measure knee ROM compared to visual and goniometer ROM measurements. A knee ROM Android mobile application was developed to measure knee ROM. Patients ≥ 18 years old presenting to an orthopaedic clinic with native knee complaints were approached to participate. Knee ROM was measured bilaterally by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon using (1) vision, (2) goniometer, and (3) the mobile application. Measurements were compared in flexion and extension using a one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Eighty-four knee ROM measurements (40 left, 44 right) were obtained in 47 patients. Median Kellgren-Lawrence grade from available radiographs was grade 3. In flexion, mobile application (117.6 ± 14.7 degrees) measurements were not significantly different from visual (116.1 ± 13.6 degrees) or goniometer (116.2 ± 13.6 degrees) measurements. In extension, mobile application (4.8 ± 7.3 degrees) measurements were significantly different from visual (1.9 ± 4.1 degrees) measurements on post hoc analysis (p < 0.01), while no differences were present compared to goniometer (3.1 ± 5.8 degrees) measurements. Our study found that a mobile application for evaluating knee ROM was noninferior to goniometer-based measurements performed by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon. Future studies will investigate this application's utility in (1) remote patient care, (2) accelerating recovery during rehabilitation, (3) detecting early postoperative complications including arthrofibrosis, and (4) adding additional functionalities to the application to provide more detail-oriented descriptive analyses of patient knee function.

开发并验证用于测量膝关节活动范围的手机应用程序
背景:膝关节活动范围(ROM)是膝关节功能的重要指标。在临床环境之外,患者可能无法准确评估膝关节活动度,这可能会影响创伤或手术后的恢复。本研究旨在验证开发的智能手机移动应用程序与目测和动态关节角度计膝关节ROM测量结果的比较:方法:开发了一款用于测量膝关节ROM的安卓手机应用程序。方法:开发了一款膝关节ROM安卓手机应用软件,用于测量膝关节ROM。由受过关节成形术培训的外科医生使用 1) 视觉、2) 角度计和 3) 移动应用程序测量双侧膝关节 ROM。通过单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验(α=0.05)对屈伸测量结果进行比较:结果:47 名患者共进行了 84 次膝关节 ROM 测量(左侧 40 次,右侧 44 次)。根据现有X光片得出的Kellgren-Lawrence分级中位数为3级。屈曲时,移动应用(117.6 ± 14.7°)的测量结果与目测(116.1 ± 13.6°)或动态关节角度计(116.2 ± 13.6°)的测量结果差异不大。在扩展方面,经事后分析,移动应用程序(4.8 ± 7.3°)的测量结果与目测(1.9 ± 4.1°)的测量结果有显著差异(p < 0.01),而与动态关节角度计(3.1 ± 5.8°)的测量结果相比则无差异:我们的研究发现,用于评估膝关节ROM的移动应用程序并不比由受过关节成形术培训的外科医生进行的基于角度计的测量结果差。未来的研究将探讨该应用在以下方面的实用性:1)远程患者护理;2)加速康复过程中的恢复;3)检测术后早期并发症(包括关节纤维化);4)为该应用添加其他功能,以便对患者膝关节功能进行更详细的描述性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信