Cranial nerve injuries post carotid endarterectomy: A 15-year prospective study with routine otolaryngologist and neurological evaluation.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.102
Walter Dorigo, Sara Speziali, Elena Giacomelli, Marco Campolmi, Lapo Dolfi, Aaron Thomas Fargion, Rossella Di Domenico, Salvatore Coscarelli, Mascia Nesi, Carlo Pratesi, Raffaele Pulli
{"title":"Cranial nerve injuries post carotid endarterectomy: A 15-year prospective study with routine otolaryngologist and neurological evaluation.","authors":"Walter Dorigo, Sara Speziali, Elena Giacomelli, Marco Campolmi, Lapo Dolfi, Aaron Thomas Fargion, Rossella Di Domenico, Salvatore Coscarelli, Mascia Nesi, Carlo Pratesi, Raffaele Pulli","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this prospective monocentric cohort study was to analyze the risk of otolaryngologist-assessed cranial nerve injuries (CNIs) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in our academic center during a 15-year period, and to identify possible risk factors for CNI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2007 to December 2022, 3749 consecutive CEAs were performed and their data prospectively recorded in a dedicated database. CNIs were assessed and defined according to a standardized protocol. Instrumental ear, nose, and throat (ENT) evaluations were conducted within 30 days before intervention and before discharge. Preoperative neurological assessments were carried out in all patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, whereas postoperative neurological evaluations were performed in all patients. Patients with newly onset CNIs underwent follow-up assessments at 30 days and, if necessary, at 6, 12, and 24 months. Perioperative results, including mortality, major central neurological events, and postoperative CNIs, were analyzed. Regression or persistence of lesions during follow-up visits was assessed, and multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression) was conducted to evaluate clinical, anatomical, and surgical technique factors influencing the occurrence of CNIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEAs were performed more frequently in male patients (2453 interventions; 65.5%) than in females (1296 interventions; 34.5%). The interventions were performed in asymptomatic patients in 3078 cases (82%). In 66 cases, the interventions followed a previous ipsilateral CEA. At preoperative ENT evaluation, no cases of ipsilateral pre-existent CNI were recorded. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 1%. In 113 patients (3%), a postoperative neck bleeding requiring surgical revision and drainage was noted. Pre-discharge ENT evaluations identified 259 motor CNIs, accounting for 6.9% of the entire study group. Eighteen patients had lesions in more than one cranial nerve. ENT and neurological evaluations at 30 days showed the complete resolution of 161 lesions, whereas in 98 cases (2.6%), the CNI persisted. At 1 year, the rate of persistent CNI was 0.4% (10 patients), whereas at 2 years, it was 0.25% (6 cases), in all but one asymptomatic. At multivariate analysis, urgent intervention in unstable patients, secondary intervention, a clamping time >40 minutes, a hematoma requiring revision, and a postoperative stroke were independent predictors of CNIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data from this prospective monocentric cohort study showed that the occurrence of CNI following CEA was low, even when an independent multi-specialist evaluation was performed. The percentage of persistent lesions at 2 years was negligible and, in most cases, asymptomatic.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective monocentric cohort study was to analyze the risk of otolaryngologist-assessed cranial nerve injuries (CNIs) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in our academic center during a 15-year period, and to identify possible risk factors for CNI development.

Methods: From January 2007 to December 2022, 3749 consecutive CEAs were performed and their data prospectively recorded in a dedicated database. CNIs were assessed and defined according to a standardized protocol. Instrumental ear, nose, and throat (ENT) evaluations were conducted within 30 days before intervention and before discharge. Preoperative neurological assessments were carried out in all patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, whereas postoperative neurological evaluations were performed in all patients. Patients with newly onset CNIs underwent follow-up assessments at 30 days and, if necessary, at 6, 12, and 24 months. Perioperative results, including mortality, major central neurological events, and postoperative CNIs, were analyzed. Regression or persistence of lesions during follow-up visits was assessed, and multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression) was conducted to evaluate clinical, anatomical, and surgical technique factors influencing the occurrence of CNIs.

Results: CEAs were performed more frequently in male patients (2453 interventions; 65.5%) than in females (1296 interventions; 34.5%). The interventions were performed in asymptomatic patients in 3078 cases (82%). In 66 cases, the interventions followed a previous ipsilateral CEA. At preoperative ENT evaluation, no cases of ipsilateral pre-existent CNI were recorded. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 1%. In 113 patients (3%), a postoperative neck bleeding requiring surgical revision and drainage was noted. Pre-discharge ENT evaluations identified 259 motor CNIs, accounting for 6.9% of the entire study group. Eighteen patients had lesions in more than one cranial nerve. ENT and neurological evaluations at 30 days showed the complete resolution of 161 lesions, whereas in 98 cases (2.6%), the CNI persisted. At 1 year, the rate of persistent CNI was 0.4% (10 patients), whereas at 2 years, it was 0.25% (6 cases), in all but one asymptomatic. At multivariate analysis, urgent intervention in unstable patients, secondary intervention, a clamping time >40 minutes, a hematoma requiring revision, and a postoperative stroke were independent predictors of CNIs.

Conclusions: Data from this prospective monocentric cohort study showed that the occurrence of CNI following CEA was low, even when an independent multi-specialist evaluation was performed. The percentage of persistent lesions at 2 years was negligible and, in most cases, asymptomatic.

颈动脉内膜切除术后的颅神经损伤:一项为期 15 年的前瞻性研究:耳鼻喉科医师和神经科医师的常规评估。
研究目的这项前瞻性单中心队列研究旨在分析本学术中心15年间颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)后耳鼻喉科医生评估的颅神经损伤(CNI)风险,并确定CNI发生的可能风险因素:方法:2007年1月至2022年12月期间,我们连续进行了3749例颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA),并将其数据记录在专用数据库中。颅神经损伤根据标准化方案进行评估和定义。干预前30天内和出院前进行耳鼻喉(ENT)器械评估。对所有有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者进行术前神经评估,对所有患者进行术后神经评估。新出现颅神经损伤的患者在术后30天接受随访评估,必要时在术后6个月、12个月和24个月接受随访评估。分析了围手术期的结果,包括死亡率、主要中枢神经事件和术后 CNIs。评估随访期间病变的消退或持续情况,并进行多变量分析(二元逻辑回归)以评估影响CNIs发生的临床、解剖和手术技术因素:男性患者(2453例介入治疗,65.5%)比女性患者(1296例介入治疗,34.5%)更常进行CEA手术。3078例(82%)无症状患者接受了介入治疗。66例患者是在同侧CEA术后进行介入治疗的。在术前耳鼻喉科评估中,没有同侧先心病患者的记录。30 天的中风和死亡率为 1%。113例患者(3%)术后颈部出血,需要手术修整和引流。出院前的耳鼻喉科评估发现了259处运动性颅神经损伤,占整个研究组的6.9%。18名患者的颅神经损伤不止一处。30 天后的耳鼻喉科和神经系统评估显示,161 例病变已完全治愈,而 98 例(2.6%)患者的颅神经损伤仍然存在。一年后,持续性 CNI 的发生率为 0.4%(10 例患者),两年后为 0.25%(6 例患者),除一例无症状外,其余均无症状。在多变量分析中,不稳定患者的紧急介入治疗、二次介入治疗、夹闭时间大于40分钟、血肿需要修补以及术后中风是CNI的独立预测因素:这项前瞻性单中心队列研究的数据显示,即使进行了独立的多专家评估,CEA术后CNI的发生率也很低。两年后持续性病变的比例微乎其微,而且大多数情况下无症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信