Efficacy and Safety of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Aleena Kashif, Manzar Abbas, Akbar K Waljee, Jeffrey A Berinstein
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Aleena Kashif, Manzar Abbas, Akbar K Waljee, Jeffrey A Berinstein","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":"58 8","pages":"753-763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy.

Methods: Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo.

Conclusion: Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.

1 磷酸腺苷受体调节剂治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景和目的:1- 磷酸腺苷受体调节剂(S1PRMs)是治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的有效药物。本综述总结了有关S1PRM疗法疗效和安全性的所有可用随机试验数据:方法:我们在多个出版物数据库中系统地搜索了中度至重度 UC 患者接受 S1PRMs 治疗的随机对照试验 (RCT)。进行了随机效应荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 工具评估了偏倚风险,并使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对证据的总体质量进行了评级:我们确定了 7 项涉及使用 S1PRMs 治疗中度至重度 UC 的 RCT(1737 例患者)。在诱导期间,与安慰剂相比,S1PRM疗法在临床缓解[RR:2.65 (95% CI:2.00, 3.53)]、临床反应[RR:1.68 (95% CI:1.48, 1.91)]、内镜改善[RR:2.17(95% CI:1.76,2.68)]、内镜正常化[RR:2.56(95% CI:1.58,3.83)]、粘膜愈合[RR:2.88(95% CI:1.94,4.26)]和组织学缓解[RR:2.42(95% CI:1.60,3.66)]。类似的结果也出现在整个维持治疗期间,尽管可供汇总的数据较少;值得注意的是,S1PRM 可显著提高持续缓解率[RR:3.57 (95% CI:1.23, 10.35)]和无类固醇缓解率[RR:2.92 (95% CI:1.35, 6.33)]。S1PRM与安慰剂在不良事件[RR:1.02(95% CI:0.90,1.15)]和感染[RR:1.15(95% CI:0.82,1.60)]方面无明显差异:汇总研究数据证实,S1PRM疗法对中重度UC患者既有效又安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信