Patients' Preference on Advanced Therapy and Follow-Up Procedure for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan: A Web-Based 3A Survey.

Q2 Medicine
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000539738
Toshifumi Morishita, Shunichi Yanai, Yosuke Toya, Takayuki Matsumoto
{"title":"Patients' Preference on Advanced Therapy and Follow-Up Procedure for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan: A Web-Based 3A Survey.","authors":"Toshifumi Morishita, Shunichi Yanai, Yosuke Toya, Takayuki Matsumoto","doi":"10.1159/000539738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the recent increase in number of drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has become important to select treatments acceptable to patients. Endoscopy and biomarkers from blood and stool samples are used to evaluate IBD disease activity. This study aimed to clarify the acceptability of usage of advanced therapy and examination methods in patients through an internet-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were asked via the internet to participate in a survey on the acceptability of nine therapies and three examination methods. The respondents rated acceptability on a scale of 1-10 and specified the most preferred option.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 388 patients with ulcerative colitis and 82 with Crohn's disease; 14.5% and 11.5% of the patients underwent intravenous infusions and subcutaneous injections, respectively. Once-daily oral administration had the highest acceptability score, which was significantly different from other administration usages (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), regardless of prior treatment history. Oral administration was preferred by 88.9% of patients. The ranking of examination methods from most to least acceptable was blood tests > endoscopy > stool tests, with significant differences among all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Blood testing (76%) and stool testing (4.5%) were the most and least preferred methods, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most acceptable usage of advanced therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was once-daily oral administration. Treatments that are effective, safe, and acceptable to patients should be selected, and examination methods acceptable to patients should be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the recent increase in number of drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has become important to select treatments acceptable to patients. Endoscopy and biomarkers from blood and stool samples are used to evaluate IBD disease activity. This study aimed to clarify the acceptability of usage of advanced therapy and examination methods in patients through an internet-based survey.

Methods: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were asked via the internet to participate in a survey on the acceptability of nine therapies and three examination methods. The respondents rated acceptability on a scale of 1-10 and specified the most preferred option.

Results: Responses were obtained from 388 patients with ulcerative colitis and 82 with Crohn's disease; 14.5% and 11.5% of the patients underwent intravenous infusions and subcutaneous injections, respectively. Once-daily oral administration had the highest acceptability score, which was significantly different from other administration usages (p < 0.0001), regardless of prior treatment history. Oral administration was preferred by 88.9% of patients. The ranking of examination methods from most to least acceptable was blood tests > endoscopy > stool tests, with significant differences among all groups (p < 0.0001). Blood testing (76%) and stool testing (4.5%) were the most and least preferred methods, respectively.

Conclusions: The most acceptable usage of advanced therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was once-daily oral administration. Treatments that are effective, safe, and acceptable to patients should be selected, and examination methods acceptable to patients should be used.

日本患者对炎症性肠病晚期治疗和随访程序的偏好:基于网络的 3A 调查。
简介近年来,治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的药物越来越多,选择患者可以接受的治疗方法变得非常重要。内窥镜检查和从血液和粪便样本中提取的生物标记物被用于评估 IBD 疾病的活动性。本研究旨在通过互联网调查,明确患者对先进疗法和检查方法的接受程度:方法:通过互联网要求炎症性肠病患者参与一项关于九种疗法和三种检查方法可接受性的调查。受访者以 1-10 分对可接受性进行评分,并指定最喜欢的选项:388名溃疡性结肠炎患者和82名克罗恩病患者做出了回答;分别有14.5%和11.5%的患者接受了静脉注射和皮下注射。每日一次口服给药的可接受性得分最高,与其他给药方式有显著差异(p < 0.0001),与之前的治疗史无关。88.9%的患者首选口服给药。检查方法从最容易接受到最不容易接受的排序是血液检查 > 内窥镜检查 > 粪便检查,各组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.0001)。血液检查(76%)和粪便检查(4.5%)分别是最受欢迎和最不受欢迎的检查方法:结论:炎症性肠病患者最容易接受的晚期治疗方法是每日口服一次。结论:炎症性肠病患者最容易接受的先进疗法是每日一次口服给药。应选择有效、安全且患者可接受的疗法,并使用患者可接受的检查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信