Health Care Leaders' Experience with a Multi-Level Intervention to Reduce Hypertension Disparities: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Razeen Karim, Paula Darby Lipman, Kristina Weeks, Yea-Jen Hsu, Deven Brown, Emily Carletto, Katie Dietz, Lisa A Cooper, Jill Marsteller
{"title":"Health Care Leaders' Experience with a Multi-Level Intervention to Reduce Hypertension Disparities: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Razeen Karim, Paula Darby Lipman, Kristina Weeks, Yea-Jen Hsu, Deven Brown, Emily Carletto, Katie Dietz, Lisa A Cooper, Jill Marsteller","doi":"10.1177/10901981241268156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With health equity growing as a priority within health care, health systems must transform that calling into action within their social, economic, and political environments. The current literature has not compared how different organizations manage the same health disparities intervention. This qualitative study aims to illustrate how different organizations navigated the implementation and sustainability of a hypertension disparities intervention by comparing experiences across Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), a private health system, and other non-clinical partnering organizations. As a study within a randomized controlled trial designed to reduce disparities in hypertension care, we conducted interviews with health care leaders before and after participation in the trial's multi-level intervention. Before participation, we interviewed five health care leaders representing five health systems. Following the intervention, we interviewed 14 leaders representing the five health systems and two partnering organizations. Discussions focused on intervention implementation and plans for sustainability. The primary considerations in implementation were appropriate staffing and multi-level organizational buy-in. When discussing long-term planning, health systems prioritized the structure of a stepped-care protocol incorporating community health workers (CHWs) and case managers. The sustainability of the CHW intervention at FQHCs was dependent on funding, whereas a private, non-FQHC physician practice network focused on expanding current resources for more patients. These findings serve as anticipatory guidance for organizations aiming to reduce hypertension disparities and provide support for policies that financially assist these interventions. Further investigation is warranted on the organizational factors that may influence the degree of success in eliminating health care disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"10901981241268156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241268156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With health equity growing as a priority within health care, health systems must transform that calling into action within their social, economic, and political environments. The current literature has not compared how different organizations manage the same health disparities intervention. This qualitative study aims to illustrate how different organizations navigated the implementation and sustainability of a hypertension disparities intervention by comparing experiences across Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), a private health system, and other non-clinical partnering organizations. As a study within a randomized controlled trial designed to reduce disparities in hypertension care, we conducted interviews with health care leaders before and after participation in the trial's multi-level intervention. Before participation, we interviewed five health care leaders representing five health systems. Following the intervention, we interviewed 14 leaders representing the five health systems and two partnering organizations. Discussions focused on intervention implementation and plans for sustainability. The primary considerations in implementation were appropriate staffing and multi-level organizational buy-in. When discussing long-term planning, health systems prioritized the structure of a stepped-care protocol incorporating community health workers (CHWs) and case managers. The sustainability of the CHW intervention at FQHCs was dependent on funding, whereas a private, non-FQHC physician practice network focused on expanding current resources for more patients. These findings serve as anticipatory guidance for organizations aiming to reduce hypertension disparities and provide support for policies that financially assist these interventions. Further investigation is warranted on the organizational factors that may influence the degree of success in eliminating health care disparities.

医疗保健领导者在采取多层次干预措施减少高血压差异方面的经验:定性分析。
随着健康公平日益成为医疗保健领域的优先事项,医疗系统必须在其社会、经济和政治环境中将这一呼吁转化为行动。目前的文献尚未对不同机构如何管理相同的健康差异干预措施进行比较。本定性研究旨在通过比较联邦合格医疗中心 (FQHC)、一家私营医疗系统和其他非临床合作机构的经验,说明不同机构是如何引导高血压差异干预措施的实施和可持续发展的。作为旨在减少高血压护理差异的随机对照试验中的一项研究,我们在参与试验的多层次干预措施之前和之后对医疗保健机构的领导进行了访谈。在参与之前,我们采访了代表五个医疗系统的五位医疗领导。干预结束后,我们采访了代表五个医疗系统和两个合作机构的 14 位领导。讨论的重点是干预措施的实施和可持续发展计划。实施过程中的主要考虑因素是适当的人员配备和多层次的组织认同。在讨论长期规划时,医疗系统优先考虑的是包含社区医疗工作者(CHWs)和个案管理者的阶梯式护理方案结构。在联邦定点医疗保健中心,社区保健员干预措施的可持续性取决于资金,而非联邦定点医疗保健中心的私人医生执业网络则侧重于为更多患者扩大现有资源。这些研究结果为旨在减少高血压差异的机构提供了预期指导,并为从资金上支持这些干预措施的政策提供了支持。对于可能影响消除医疗差距成功程度的组织因素,还有待进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信