Health policy and systems research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia: a collaborative approach.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Getasew Amare, Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu, Asmamaw Atnafu, Lemma Derseh, Kassu Ketema Gurmu, Theodros Getachew, Binyam Tilahun
{"title":"Health policy and systems research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia: a collaborative approach.","authors":"Getasew Amare, Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu, Asmamaw Atnafu, Lemma Derseh, Kassu Ketema Gurmu, Theodros Getachew, Binyam Tilahun","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01198-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a multi-disciplinary approach of generating health system and policy-level evidence. Setting HPSR agendas is considered as an efficient strategy to map and identify policy and cost-effective research topics, but its practice in developing countries is limited. This paper aimed to conduct a collaborative health policy and system research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The WHO's plan, implement, publish, and evaluate (PIPE) framework and the Delphi technique were used to conduct the priority-setting exercise. The PIPE model was used to lead the priority-setting process from planning to evaluation, while the Delphi technique was used to run the rating and ranking exercise with the aim of reaching a consensus. Two rounds of expert panel workshops supplemented with an online survey were used for the HPSR agenda setting, rating and ranking purposes. Groups were formed using the WHO health system building blocks as a base framework to identify and prioritize the HPSR topics.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Under 8 themes, 32 sub-themes and 182 HPSR topics were identified. The identified research themes include leadership management and governance, health policy, health information system, healthcare financing, human resource for health, medical products and supply, service delivery and cross-cutting issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Priority HPSR topics focussing on national health priority issues were identified. The identified topics were shared with policymakers and academic and research institutions. Evidence generation on the identified priority topics will guide future research endeavours and improve evidence-informed decision-making practice, health system performance and national health goals and targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01198-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a multi-disciplinary approach of generating health system and policy-level evidence. Setting HPSR agendas is considered as an efficient strategy to map and identify policy and cost-effective research topics, but its practice in developing countries is limited. This paper aimed to conduct a collaborative health policy and system research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia.

Method: The WHO's plan, implement, publish, and evaluate (PIPE) framework and the Delphi technique were used to conduct the priority-setting exercise. The PIPE model was used to lead the priority-setting process from planning to evaluation, while the Delphi technique was used to run the rating and ranking exercise with the aim of reaching a consensus. Two rounds of expert panel workshops supplemented with an online survey were used for the HPSR agenda setting, rating and ranking purposes. Groups were formed using the WHO health system building blocks as a base framework to identify and prioritize the HPSR topics.

Result: Under 8 themes, 32 sub-themes and 182 HPSR topics were identified. The identified research themes include leadership management and governance, health policy, health information system, healthcare financing, human resource for health, medical products and supply, service delivery and cross-cutting issues.

Conclusions: Priority HPSR topics focussing on national health priority issues were identified. The identified topics were shared with policymakers and academic and research institutions. Evidence generation on the identified priority topics will guide future research endeavours and improve evidence-informed decision-making practice, health system performance and national health goals and targets.

埃塞俄比亚卫生政策和系统研究优先事项确定工作:一种合作方法。
导言:卫生政策与系统研究(HPSR)是一种生成卫生系统和政策层面证据的多学科方法。制定卫生政策与系统研究议程被认为是规划和确定政策及成本效益研究课题的有效策略,但在发展中国家的实践却很有限。本文旨在埃塞俄比亚开展一项合作性卫生政策和系统研究优先事项制定工作:方法:采用世界卫生组织的计划、实施、发布和评估(PIPE)框架和德尔菲技术开展优先事项确定工作。PIPE 模式用于引导从规划到评估的优先事项确定过程,而德尔菲技术则用于开展评级和排序工作,目的是达成共识。在制定 HPSR 议程、评级和排序时,使用了两轮专家小组研讨会,并辅以在线调查。各小组以世界卫生组织卫生系统构建模块为基础框架,确定 HPSR 议题并排定优先次序:结果:确定了 8 个主题、32 个子主题和 182 个 HPSR 议题。确定的研究主题包括领导管理和治理、卫生政策、卫生信息系统、医疗筹资、卫生人力资源、医疗产品和供应、服务提供和横向问题:确定了重点关注国家卫生优先问题的优先 HPSR 专题。与政策制定者和学术研究机构分享了所确定的主题。就所确定的优先主题生成的证据将指导未来的研究工作,并改进以证据为依据的决策实践、卫生系统绩效以及国家卫生目标和指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信