Feasibility of Laboratory Equipment-Based Simulation Methods to Assess the Impact of Vehicle Transportation on Product Quality of mAb Dosing Solutions.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Molecular Pharmaceutics Pub Date : 2024-09-02 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00681
Kashappa Goud Desai, Cait Sofa, Ning Wang, Bivash Mandal, Brendan Blockus, Nathan Heacock, James D Colandene
{"title":"Feasibility of Laboratory Equipment-Based Simulation Methods to Assess the Impact of Vehicle Transportation on Product Quality of mAb Dosing Solutions.","authors":"Kashappa Goud Desai, Cait Sofa, Ning Wang, Bivash Mandal, Brendan Blockus, Nathan Heacock, James D Colandene","doi":"10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) products for intravenous (IV) administration generally require aseptic compounding with a commercially available diluent. When the administration site is located away from the preparation site, the prepared dosing solution may need to be transported in a vehicle. The impact of vehicle transportation on the product quality of mAbs needs to be evaluated to define safe handling and transportation conditions for dosing solutions. The design and execution of actual vehicle transportation studies require considerable resources and time. In this study, we systematically developed three different laboratory equipment-based methods that simulate vehicle transportation stresses: orbital shaker (OS), reciprocating shaker (RS), and vibration test system (VTS)-based simulation methods. We assessed their feasibility by comparing the impact on product quality caused by each simulated method with that caused by actual vehicle transportation. Without residual polysorbate 80 (PS80) in the mAb dosing solution, transportation via a cargo van led to a considerable increase in the subvisible particle counts and did not meet the compendial specifications for the light obscuration method. However, the presence of as low as 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution stabilized the mAb against vehicle transportation stresses and met the compendial specifications. Vehicle transportation of an IV bag with headspace resulted in negligible micro air bubbles and foaming in both PS80-free and PS80-containing mAb dosing solutions. These phenomena were found to be comparable to the VTS-based simulated method. However, the OS- and RS-based simulated methods formed significantly more micro air bubbles and foaming in an IV bag with headspace than either actual vehicle transportation or the VTS-based simulated method. Despite the higher interfacial stress (micro air bubbles and foaming) in the dosing solution created by the OS- and RS-based simulated methods, 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution was found to be sufficient to stabilize the mAb. The study shows that under appropriate simulated conditions, the OS-, RS-, and VTS-based simulated methods can be used as practical and meaningful models to assess the impact and risk of vehicle transportation on the quality of mAb dosing solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) products for intravenous (IV) administration generally require aseptic compounding with a commercially available diluent. When the administration site is located away from the preparation site, the prepared dosing solution may need to be transported in a vehicle. The impact of vehicle transportation on the product quality of mAbs needs to be evaluated to define safe handling and transportation conditions for dosing solutions. The design and execution of actual vehicle transportation studies require considerable resources and time. In this study, we systematically developed three different laboratory equipment-based methods that simulate vehicle transportation stresses: orbital shaker (OS), reciprocating shaker (RS), and vibration test system (VTS)-based simulation methods. We assessed their feasibility by comparing the impact on product quality caused by each simulated method with that caused by actual vehicle transportation. Without residual polysorbate 80 (PS80) in the mAb dosing solution, transportation via a cargo van led to a considerable increase in the subvisible particle counts and did not meet the compendial specifications for the light obscuration method. However, the presence of as low as 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution stabilized the mAb against vehicle transportation stresses and met the compendial specifications. Vehicle transportation of an IV bag with headspace resulted in negligible micro air bubbles and foaming in both PS80-free and PS80-containing mAb dosing solutions. These phenomena were found to be comparable to the VTS-based simulated method. However, the OS- and RS-based simulated methods formed significantly more micro air bubbles and foaming in an IV bag with headspace than either actual vehicle transportation or the VTS-based simulated method. Despite the higher interfacial stress (micro air bubbles and foaming) in the dosing solution created by the OS- and RS-based simulated methods, 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution was found to be sufficient to stabilize the mAb. The study shows that under appropriate simulated conditions, the OS-, RS-, and VTS-based simulated methods can be used as practical and meaningful models to assess the impact and risk of vehicle transportation on the quality of mAb dosing solutions.

Abstract Image

基于实验室设备的模拟方法评估车辆运输对 mAb 配料溶液产品质量影响的可行性。
用于静脉注射(IV)的治疗性单克隆抗体(mAb)产品通常需要使用市售稀释剂进行无菌配制。如果给药地点远离配制地点,配制好的给药溶液可能需要用车辆运输。需要评估车辆运输对 mAbs 产品质量的影响,以确定配料溶液的安全处理和运输条件。设计和执行实际的车辆运输研究需要大量的资源和时间。在本研究中,我们系统地开发了三种不同的基于实验室设备的方法来模拟车辆运输应力:轨道振动器 (OS)、往复振动器 (RS) 和基于振动测试系统 (VTS) 的模拟方法。通过比较每种模拟方法和实际车辆运输对产品质量的影响,我们评估了这些方法的可行性。如果 mAb 配料溶液中没有残留的聚山梨醇酯 80 (PS80),通过货车运输会导致亚可见粒子数大幅增加,并且不符合光遮蔽法的药典规范。然而,配料溶液中低至 0.0004%w/v(4 ppm)的 PS80 能使 mAb 在车辆运输应力下保持稳定,并符合药典规范。车辆运输带有顶空的静脉注射袋时,不含 PS80 和含 PS80 的 mAb 配料溶液中的微气泡和泡沫都可以忽略不计。这些现象与基于 VTS 的模拟方法相当。然而,与实际的车辆运输或基于 VTS 的模拟方法相比,基于 OS 和 RS 的模拟方法在有顶空的静脉注射袋中形成的微气泡和泡沫要多得多。尽管基于操作系统和 RS 的模拟方法在配料溶液中产生了较高的界面应力(微气泡和泡沫),但研究发现配料溶液中 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm)的 PS80 足以稳定 mAb。这项研究表明,在适当的模拟条件下,基于 OS、RS 和 VTS 的模拟方法可作为实用而有意义的模型,用于评估车辆运输对 mAb 配料溶液质量的影响和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Molecular Pharmaceutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
391
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Pharmaceutics publishes the results of original research that contributes significantly to the molecular mechanistic understanding of drug delivery and drug delivery systems. The journal encourages contributions describing research at the interface of drug discovery and drug development. Scientific areas within the scope of the journal include physical and pharmaceutical chemistry, biochemistry and biophysics, molecular and cellular biology, and polymer and materials science as they relate to drug and drug delivery system efficacy. Mechanistic Drug Delivery and Drug Targeting research on modulating activity and efficacy of a drug or drug product is within the scope of Molecular Pharmaceutics. Theoretical and experimental peer-reviewed research articles, communications, reviews, and perspectives are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信