Using nominal group technique with people who are incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons to identify barriers and solutions to improving Prison Needle Exchange Program uptake

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Lise Lafferty , Frederick L Altice , Frederic Leone , Mark Stoové , Andrew R Lloyd , Behzad Hajarizadeh , Nadine Kronfli
{"title":"Using nominal group technique with people who are incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons to identify barriers and solutions to improving Prison Needle Exchange Program uptake","authors":"Lise Lafferty ,&nbsp;Frederick L Altice ,&nbsp;Frederic Leone ,&nbsp;Mark Stoové ,&nbsp;Andrew R Lloyd ,&nbsp;Behzad Hajarizadeh ,&nbsp;Nadine Kronfli","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prison needle exchange programs (PNEPs) are a critical component for harm reduction in prisons. Little is known about the PNEP access barriers for people who are incarcerated, but the low uptake in the Canadian program highlights these constraints. We aimed to identify the barriers and potential solutions for increasing PNEP coverage in the nine Canadian federal prisons where they operate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighteen focus groups were conducted in nine prisons using nominal group technique (NGT) with two stakeholders: peer advocates and people who use or identified as potential users of the PNEP. NGT uses a round-robin technique followed by generating a list of barriers to PNEP enrolment within their prison. Participants then allocated votes to rank the highest priority barriers, followed by an identical process to generate solutions to address the top three barriers. Interview transcripts describing participant narratives during this process were de-identified and coded to generated themes. Barriers and solutions receiving &gt;10 % of votes within respective participant groups, alongside associated narratives, are discussed more fully.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fear of repercussions due to drug use, lack of confidentiality, and fear of being targeted and sanctioned by correctional authorities were perceived by both stakeholder groups as the top barriers inhibiting PNEP enrolment. Stigma (peer advocates) and the application process for the program (PNEP users) were also ranked as a priority. Proposed solutions included education and external oversight of PNEP (i.e., not via correctional officers) by both groups. Peer advocates regarded improving participant confidentiality and a supervised/safe injection site as potential enablers for program participation, while PNEP users identified wrap-around services as likely to improve access.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Barriers to increasing PNEP coverage in Canadian federal prisons proposed by participants highlight the importance of trust and perceived repercussions surrounding program participation. These barriers and proposed solutions highlight a need for changes in implementation to PNEP delivery if the potential health benefits of PNEPs are to be realised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002330/pdfft?md5=47dc72f1765bab8b3d221ae86f20316f&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002330-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prison needle exchange programs (PNEPs) are a critical component for harm reduction in prisons. Little is known about the PNEP access barriers for people who are incarcerated, but the low uptake in the Canadian program highlights these constraints. We aimed to identify the barriers and potential solutions for increasing PNEP coverage in the nine Canadian federal prisons where they operate.

Methods

Eighteen focus groups were conducted in nine prisons using nominal group technique (NGT) with two stakeholders: peer advocates and people who use or identified as potential users of the PNEP. NGT uses a round-robin technique followed by generating a list of barriers to PNEP enrolment within their prison. Participants then allocated votes to rank the highest priority barriers, followed by an identical process to generate solutions to address the top three barriers. Interview transcripts describing participant narratives during this process were de-identified and coded to generated themes. Barriers and solutions receiving >10 % of votes within respective participant groups, alongside associated narratives, are discussed more fully.

Results

Fear of repercussions due to drug use, lack of confidentiality, and fear of being targeted and sanctioned by correctional authorities were perceived by both stakeholder groups as the top barriers inhibiting PNEP enrolment. Stigma (peer advocates) and the application process for the program (PNEP users) were also ranked as a priority. Proposed solutions included education and external oversight of PNEP (i.e., not via correctional officers) by both groups. Peer advocates regarded improving participant confidentiality and a supervised/safe injection site as potential enablers for program participation, while PNEP users identified wrap-around services as likely to improve access.

Conclusion

Barriers to increasing PNEP coverage in Canadian federal prisons proposed by participants highlight the importance of trust and perceived repercussions surrounding program participation. These barriers and proposed solutions highlight a need for changes in implementation to PNEP delivery if the potential health benefits of PNEPs are to be realised.

利用名义小组技术,与加拿大联邦监狱中的被监禁者一起,找出提高监狱针头交换计划使用率的障碍和解决方案
背景监狱针具交换项目(PNEPs)是监狱中减少伤害的重要组成部分。人们对被监禁者获得 PNEP 的障碍知之甚少,但加拿大计划的低吸收率凸显了这些限制因素。我们的目标是在加拿大的九所联邦监狱中,找出提高 PNEP 覆盖率的障碍和潜在解决方案。方法在九所监狱中,采用名义小组技术(NGT)与两个利益相关者开展了 18 次焦点小组讨论,这两个利益相关者分别是同伴倡导者和 PNEP 的使用者或潜在使用者。NGT 采用循环技术,然后列出监狱中阻碍加入 PNEP 的障碍。然后,参与者投票选出优先级最高的障碍,再通过相同的程序提出解决前三名障碍的方案。在此过程中,对描述参与者叙述的访谈记录进行了去身份化处理,并根据生成的主题进行了编码。结果两个利益相关者群体都认为,害怕因吸毒而受到影响、缺乏保密性以及害怕成为管教当局的目标和制裁对象是阻碍参加 PNEP 的首要障碍。耻辱感(同伴倡导者)和该计划的申请程序(PNEP 用户)也被列为优先事项。建议的解决方案包括由这两个群体对 PNEP 进行教育和外部监督(即不通过管教人员)。同行倡导者认为,提高参与者的保密性和提供受监督/安全的注射场所是参与该计划的潜在推动因素,而 PNEP 使用者则认为配套服务有可能提高参与该计划的机会。这些障碍和建议的解决方案强调,如果要实现 PNEPs 潜在的健康益处,就必须改变 PNEP 的实施方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信