Deep learning reconstruction for optimized bone assessment in zero echo time MR imaging of the knee

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction for optimized bone assessment in zero echo time MR imaging of the knee","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLRecon) on bone assessment in zero echo-time (ZTE) MRI of the knee at 1.5 Tesla.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 48 consecutive exams of 46 patients (23 females) who underwent clinically indicated knee MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Standard imaging protocol comprised a sagittal prescribed, isotropic ZTE sequence. ZTE image reconstruction was performed with a standard-of-care (non-DL) and prototype DLRecon method. Exams were divided into subsets with and without osseous pathology based on the radiology report. Using a 4-point scale, two blinded readers qualitatively graded features of bone depiction including artifacts and conspicuity of pathology including diagnostic certainty in the respective subsets. Quantitatively, one reader measured signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of bone. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between the reconstruction methods. In addition, interreader agreement was calculated for the qualitative gradings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DLRecon significantly improved gradings for bone depiction relative to non-DL reconstruction (all, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), while there was no significant difference with regards to artifacts (both, median score of 0; <em>p</em> = 0.058). In the subset with pathologies, conspicuity of pathology and diagnostic confidence were also scored significantly higher in DLRecon compared to non-DL (median 3 vs 2; <em>p</em> ≤ 0.03). Interreader agreement ranged from moderate to almost-perfect (<em>κ</em> = 0.54–0.88). Quantitatively, DLRecon demonstrated significantly enhanced CNR and SNR of bone compared to non-DL (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ZTE MRI with DLRecon improved bone depiction in the knee, compared to non-DL. Additionally, DLRecon increased conspicuity of osseous findings together with diagnostic certainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24003796/pdfft?md5=14ac87eff2eb5fea7c385ca0bf67a454&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24003796-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24003796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLRecon) on bone assessment in zero echo-time (ZTE) MRI of the knee at 1.5 Tesla.

Methods

This retrospective study included 48 consecutive exams of 46 patients (23 females) who underwent clinically indicated knee MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Standard imaging protocol comprised a sagittal prescribed, isotropic ZTE sequence. ZTE image reconstruction was performed with a standard-of-care (non-DL) and prototype DLRecon method. Exams were divided into subsets with and without osseous pathology based on the radiology report. Using a 4-point scale, two blinded readers qualitatively graded features of bone depiction including artifacts and conspicuity of pathology including diagnostic certainty in the respective subsets. Quantitatively, one reader measured signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of bone. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between the reconstruction methods. In addition, interreader agreement was calculated for the qualitative gradings.

Results

DLRecon significantly improved gradings for bone depiction relative to non-DL reconstruction (all, p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference with regards to artifacts (both, median score of 0; p = 0.058). In the subset with pathologies, conspicuity of pathology and diagnostic confidence were also scored significantly higher in DLRecon compared to non-DL (median 3 vs 2; p ≤ 0.03). Interreader agreement ranged from moderate to almost-perfect (κ = 0.54–0.88). Quantitatively, DLRecon demonstrated significantly enhanced CNR and SNR of bone compared to non-DL (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

ZTE MRI with DLRecon improved bone depiction in the knee, compared to non-DL. Additionally, DLRecon increased conspicuity of osseous findings together with diagnostic certainty.

在膝关节零回波时间磁共振成像中进行深度学习重建以优化骨质评估
目的评估基于深度学习的重建(DLRecon)对 1.5 特斯拉膝关节零回波时间(ZTE)核磁共振成像中骨评估的影响。方法这项回顾性研究包括对 46 名患者(23 名女性)进行的 48 次连续检查,这些患者均在 1.5 特斯拉下接受了有临床指征的膝关节核磁共振成像。标准成像方案包括矢状面规定的各向同性 ZTE 序列。ZTE 图像重建采用标准护理(非 DL)和原型 DLRecon 方法。根据放射学报告,将检查分为有骨质病变和无骨质病变两个子集。两名双盲读者使用 4 点评分法对骨描述特征(包括伪影)和病理学的明显性(包括各自子集中的诊断确定性)进行定性评分。在定量方面,一位读者测量了骨的信噪比(SNR)和对比信噪比(CNR)。进行比较分析以评估重建方法之间的差异。结果相对于非 DL 重建,DLRecon 能显著提高骨质描绘的评分(所有评分,p <0.05),而在伪影方面没有显著差异(两者的中位数均为 0 分;p = 0.058)。在有病变的子集中,与非 DL 相比,DLRecon 的病变明显度和诊断信心得分也明显更高(中位数为 3 vs 2;p ≤ 0.03)。读片者之间的一致性从中等到几乎完美不等(κ = 0.54-0.88)。结论与非 DL 相比,使用 DLRecon 的 ZTE MRI 改善了膝关节的骨骼描绘。此外,DLRecon 提高了骨质发现的清晰度和诊断的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信