Adult perceptions of mental health access barriers facing youth in rural Washington State: A group concept mapping study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Janessa M Graves, Demetrius A Abshire, Jessica L Mackelprang, Tracy A Klein, Carmen Gonzalez, Kailee Parrott, Deborah U Eti, Jordan G Ferris, Christina M Chacon, Ashley D Beck
{"title":"Adult perceptions of mental health access barriers facing youth in rural Washington State: A group concept mapping study.","authors":"Janessa M Graves, Demetrius A Abshire, Jessica L Mackelprang, Tracy A Klein, Carmen Gonzalez, Kailee Parrott, Deborah U Eti, Jordan G Ferris, Christina M Chacon, Ashley D Beck","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore adult community members' perspectives concerning barriers to mental health care that confront rural-dwelling youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group concept mapping, a participatory community-engaged research method, was used. Adult community members brainstormed and sorted statements describing barriers rural youth encounter in accessing mental health services. Point and cluster maps were created to visualize conceptual similarities between statements. Statements were rated according to their commonness and importance (1: low commonness/importance, 5: high commonness/importance).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Thirty-five adults sorted and/or rated 71 barriers facing rural youth in accessing mental health services. Seven conceptual clusters were identified: system-level barriers, knowledge and communication, youth concerns, parent/guardian concerns, parent/guardian barriers, costs and convenience, and school-level barriers. Within youth concerns, community members also identified a subcluster focused on stigma. Common and important statements related to limited after-school programs and community mental health support initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Group concept mapping methodology provides structure for conceptualizing challenges facing rural youth in accessing mental health services. Policies should be informed by rural community concerns and priorities. After-school and support programs may align with mental health needs identified by rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore adult community members' perspectives concerning barriers to mental health care that confront rural-dwelling youth.

Methods: Group concept mapping, a participatory community-engaged research method, was used. Adult community members brainstormed and sorted statements describing barriers rural youth encounter in accessing mental health services. Point and cluster maps were created to visualize conceptual similarities between statements. Statements were rated according to their commonness and importance (1: low commonness/importance, 5: high commonness/importance).

Findings: Thirty-five adults sorted and/or rated 71 barriers facing rural youth in accessing mental health services. Seven conceptual clusters were identified: system-level barriers, knowledge and communication, youth concerns, parent/guardian concerns, parent/guardian barriers, costs and convenience, and school-level barriers. Within youth concerns, community members also identified a subcluster focused on stigma. Common and important statements related to limited after-school programs and community mental health support initiatives.

Conclusions: Group concept mapping methodology provides structure for conceptualizing challenges facing rural youth in accessing mental health services. Policies should be informed by rural community concerns and priorities. After-school and support programs may align with mental health needs identified by rural communities.

成年人对华盛顿州农村地区青少年所面临的心理健康障碍的看法:小组概念绘图研究。
目的:探讨成年社区成员对农村青年面临的心理保健障碍的看法:方法:采用参与式社区参与研究方法--小组概念绘图法。成年社区成员集思广益,对描述农村青少年在获得心理健康服务时遇到的障碍的陈述进行分类。绘制了点图和聚类图,以直观显示陈述之间的概念相似性。根据陈述的普遍性和重要性对陈述进行评分(1:低普遍性/重要性,5:高普遍性/重要性):35 位成年人对农村青少年在获得心理健康服务时面临的 71 个障碍进行了分类和/或评分。研究确定了七个概念组群:系统层面的障碍、知识和沟通、青少年关注的问题、家长/监护人关注的问题、家长/监护人的障碍、费用和便利性以及学校层面的障碍。在青少年关注的问题中,社区成员还确定了一个以污名化为重点的子群组。共同的重要声明涉及有限的课后项目和社区心理健康支持计划:小组概念绘图法为农村青少年在获得心理健康服务方面所面临的挑战提供了概念化的结构。相关政策应考虑到农村社区的关注点和优先事项。课后项目和支持项目可以与农村社区确定的心理健康需求相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信